​New E-Cat QX Picture and New Rossi-Gullstrom Paper (Very high COP reported with Calorimetry)​

Quote from SSC

Bob, Darden argued during the trial of never having considered Doral's test as the GPT. Despite this, he let the test run for the entire duration (which was scheduled for the GPT). Do you think that this attitude could be a proof that he was inclined to pay? Why Darden did not stop the test at the beginning knowing that he would have to pay at the end of it and considering that he did not agree with his performance? It is clear that the intention to pay has never existed.

SSC,

It is true that Darden stated the Doral event was not the GPT. This is because ROSSI provided AND SIGNED a legal agreement that the event was for a sale of heat to a REAL customer making REAL production! That the Sale of Heat was for $1000 per day. The legal document had no clause nor mention of the GPT. The GPT was already void at the time and the legal documents showed that Rossi was well aware of that. Also, Ampergo refused to sign the GPT agreement. There was NO doubt that the GPT was NOT being conducted. Rossi himself, provided the sale of heat contract.

And then it was fraudulently presented by him as being a separate, independent company which it most certainly was not.

So, IH DID pay Rossi $11.5 MILLION DOLLARS and for what? Rossi himself is not pursuing the 1MW plant any longer as he himself does not think it worth pursuing! Is this worth $11.5 MILLIONS dollars ?

Quote from Henry

Yes, it was a big problem to be fixed... but now the electric bill has been paid.

The problem was first reported the day before.

Writing what you do is why I suggested there should be a separate thread for people like you called "Shut Rossi Down"

If used, it would remove half the junk from the other threads.

Quote from ele

Henry when you will stop trolling around ?

I think that nobody founds funny or interesting your writings.

LOL, funny coincidence ele, I think exactly the same about your comments.

Quote from Adrian Ashfield

The problem was first reported the day before.

This is the ritual theater play.

Quote from Adrian Ashfield

Writing what you do is why I suggested there should be a separate thread for people like you called "Shut Rossi Down"

If used, it would remove half the junk from the other threads.

I suggested there should be a separate place for people like you called "Rossi's hoax supporters". If used, it would remove 100% of the junk from Lenr-forum.

Quote

Do you have any accomplishments yourself, apart from a few very basic papers on gunsmoke published 30 years ago?

"Gunsmoke" -- that's funny Allan. Sounds terribly wispy. In fact, so far, I have a dozen or so papers I actually did the original research work for and wrote and for which I am principal author or one of less than four. I also authored several dozen technical reports (some with other authors, others alone) and some of my working life consisted of writing summaries and reviews of other records and reports for a concern which does not publish them but uses these internally. There are more than a hundred of those. I also wrote three book chapters in two different books and gave many talks at meetings. And I was on a university faculty and taught a course for a while.

I could send that information to you, Allan but what good would it do? What in the world does it have to with the fact that Levi is an academic nonentity and is not deserving of the slightest prestige. I have no idea why UniBo keeps him on. I doubt he would have lasted five years in a US college or university of any repute.

Suppose, for the sake of argument, that I had written ZERO papers and had NO academic accomplishments at all and not even an association with research or academia, then that would somehow make Levi more respectable or accomplished in your very strange view?

Edited to add: Of course, Levi's lack of distinction in science does not make it impossible for him to make great discoveries. It makes it a great deal less likely. And it means that one can't rely on Levi's accomplishments to establish his credibility.

No no. Mary is obviously one of the persons with the clearest views in here.

She is still not compromised by "believing in something, just because it would save the world altough most of the proofs/evidences are simply fraud ).

This means, that infinite repetition of a statement ( like used in Nazi germany and now in the anti islam campaign ) still did not affect her common sense of objective perspective on that statement, the pro's and con's and the general development at all.

A lot of people in here should pay attention to this asdvanced, objective and critical perspective of how to evaluate some statements, that are presented like LENR is, especially by such fraudsters like Rossi.

Quote

Levi has participated in so many researches, as evidenced by articles bearing his name.

A dozen or so is not many for decades of scientific work. It's trivial. And be careful. At least one listing of papers offered earlier was by a different G. Levi. Levi is a common name.

Quote

IH initially succeeded to create functioning reactors, as it is testified in some of the emails you can find in the trial documents,

Which document is that? I would love to see it. Link pls?

Quote

Yet the reactor tested in Lugano was built by IH, and that reactor worked well, as the Lugano report shows and as is clear by the fact that the Swedish professors are replicating that reactor.

No. The evidence is of a bad experiment using horribly deficient methods and Rossi's hands constantly in the pie so it is not independent. How do we know what the Swedish professors are doing? Do you have a private channel? Where is it published?

Quote

Moreover the QuarkX demo is approaching: it is normal for him to dedicate more time to the new product during this time.

Simply hilarious! On all fronts.

Quote

So how long does it take to replicate?

Let's go back to basics. As I have often said (sorry for repeating it but believer people tend to forget) Rossi could prove that the ecat works in something around a month or less and with the expenditure of a few thousand dollars and maybe a hundred or two hundred man-hours. All he'd have to do is to crank up Levi's famous experiment reported in NyTeknik which made steady state power for 18 hours at around 20kW and peak power of 135kW from a tennis ball sized device! That, of course, would assume he wasn't lying and cheating with the measurements at that time. And if he was, why wasn't he always doing that? See the simple and to quote Jed, "irrefutable" logic?

Forgot? Here is a refresher: https://www.nyteknik.se/energi…cludes-combustion-6421304

Oh yeah... Rossi would have to have the test done independently and of course, the power in and power out measurement methods would have to be CALIBRATED.