Brillouin is quoted as saying:

Quote

As you were saying in the last segment, some water about the size of a pencil combined with your device would power your home’s energy needs for about 10-15 years, that’s an amazing and transformative technology, but it’s difficult for you to get this out into the market place because Wall Street has some invested interests in the invested energy infrastructure.

This is complete bullsh*t. It is as if nobody would buy airplanes because there were "invested interests in the invested railroad infrastructure". BTW, this sort of nonsense statement and poor grammar, along with obvious typo errors in drawings, is characteristic of Brillouin. They have no class and no "presence" and they just seem like a bunch of goof offs when one reads anything they wrote. Hillbillies maybe.

Quote

Absolutely, when we took it to Wall Street, they looked at the upside potential of this kind of technology and said it’s worth trillions, you’re only trying to raise 15-20 million dollars, it makes no sense, we can’t do that.

More total nonsense. Anyway, what does it mean to "take it to Wallstreet"? Nothing. It's just silly words.

The article goes on to say:

Quote

If according to Anthropocene, LENR makers have been demonstrating net energy for decades now on three continents, we’re going to assume that Brillouin is able to demonstrate net energy in a controlled experiment conducted by a third party of a venture capital investor’s choosing (pretty much a requirement to raise funding guys). This will also serve to validate the SRI findings as well. If they are not willing to do that, then that either means they cannot or they are not serious enough about pursuing commercialization.

Yup! Indeed. The article is excellent and makes sense. Brillouin, as usual, makes claims and nothing else.

Quote

And yet Robert Godes speaks so warmly about you. He even has a signed photograph pinned to his closet wall.

Let's see where they are in two years and five years. How long have they been rattling around now, without any clear cut independent evidence that they have something? (McKubre doesn't count)

BTW, want to bet on them having a marketable product in 2 years? Five years? However long you want? I won't bet as high on them as on Rossi because they have essentially shown no cards yet, but I'd go high enough to make it worth your trouble.

Quote

You are passionate about gambling, as I see ...... Will you keep the same odds even after the October demo?

Whose October demo? Of what? Under whose auspices and supervision?

Quote

When the first purchases will come, we will also have the first opinions from the buyers and we will could have an idea of the reactor's validity. For now, the most clever thing to do, in my opinion, is to wait without giving unfounded judgments.

I agree. I am telling prospective buyers of my patented and powerful pink invisible flying unicorns (PIFU's™)the exact same thing.

I already look forward to you demonstrating them.

Seriously, Barty? You fell for that classical scammer's trickery? So let's see... Tesla would not have sold the Roadster, the model S, or the model X because, hey, they had better models they were testing that would sell more... like the just released model 3. And the Wright Brothers would not have sold any airplanes until the creation of the F18 and the 747. Rossi is simply following the classical script for high tech free energy frauds. Ever decreasing actual performance, ever more vague and convoluted tests with equivocal results, and lots of razzle dazzle promises.

Rossi could have made billions simply selling space heaters based on the original rusty crummy ecats. Any idea how many people in the world are cold in the winters and can't afford fuel? And if you believed that the original ecat performed as described by Rossi and Levi, it could have been ready for real safety testing (not the shlocky crap SELF tests Rossi claimed) and distribution within a few years. And THAT was in January 2011. Not to forget the factory that Rossi heated in 2007!

Quote

You also organize a demo and show off your wonderful invention, then you may be able to seriously talk about prospective buyers. Until then you're just fu**ing about.

Quote

I already look forward to you demonstrating them. [PIFU's]

I will have a demonstration but there is one small problem to surmount and that is the PIFU's invisibility. It makes them hard to herd and extract power from (sort of like Rossi's devices) and that makes prospective buyers reluctant. But when I am ready, I will have the PIFU's tested. By some famous Swedish professors.