This is an effort that would be worthwhile. I do not trust Steven Krivit or Ed Storms to approach the task with enough detachment from their own views of what is going on or with an adequate knowledge of the physics to bring to bear on the challenge of explaining the different LENR theories in straightforward terms. Perhaps someone like David Nagel could pull it off.
The hope would be that someone with a good knowledge of physics would be able to explain each theory in a way that would ideally meet with the agreement of the theory's author but also be boiled down, with any blanks filled in that are needed to understand what the author is getting at. If this was done, I think many theories would become less mysterious, and, as a consequence, they would be readily identified as being unphysical or unlikely.
