NASA: New Paper about Experimental Progress

Quote from LeBob

Ok so according to your theory the proton charge wave decays into stable electrons?

Charge is a topological effect of magnetism. The prime muon that is formed from protons is the u+ and has the same charge as the proton. The u- contains two negative charge masses one that compensates the electron charge and the other is the one you see after the decay.

The particle classification of SM is bare nonsense if you once understand how mass and charge is formed. The miss understanding of this idea that the muon is a heavy electron did lead to a wrong 4-He charge radius and to a very good proton charge radius. Because the muon is a three rotation particle it can ideally match the proton but 4-He is a 4 rotation only mass and the waves are not conform. The electron is far better coupling as it does 2 rotations.

Quote from Curbina

Its really sad to see that a LENR paper needs to employ classic hot fusion terms and theories just to be accepted and published in a Physics Journal, and by doing that loses most of the meaning and practical implicances.

I often wonder about to what extent this is true however. If a research group is thinking and/or observing something but writes something else in the papers, that's just dishonest reporting in my opinion.

Still dishonest.

Full collection from the same author.

A work in relation with Rossi too.

New USPTO Patent Application, based on the Physical Review C paper ---

"Nuclear fusion reactions in deuterated metals"

https://journals.aps.org/prc/a…15597a86203c464d727b8de5b

United States Patent Application 20200051701 February 13, 2020

"METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING LOCALIZED NUCLEAR FUSION REACTIONS ENHANCED BY ELECTRON SCREENING"

Abstract

Methods and apparatuses for facilitating localized nuclear fusion reactions in a globally cold deeply screened fuel source are disclosed, where the volume of cold fuel is much larger than that of hot fuel participating in fission reactions, maintaining structural integrity. Such a deeply screened environment may facilitate the combination of shell and conduction electrons and plasma channels created from external x-ray and/or gamma irradiation. Deeply screened fuel nuclei can tunnel at lower energies, and can much more effectively scatter at high angles, leading to increased tunneling probabilities. Local "hot" fusion conditions may be created by providing neutral hot particles (e.g., hot neutrons) that are substantially more effective at high angle scattering off charged fuel nuclei and can deliver around a half of their kinetic energy in one collision to result in a hot fuel nucleus. Such methods and apparatuses may have various applications, such as heat or medical isotope production.

http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi…0051701&RS=DN/20200051701

Described as "locally hot but globally cold nuclear fusion"

There is a lot of talk about electron screening to increase Lenr. In this patent, it's used to increase hot fusion.

In a crystal lattice, we always imagine electrons speed as harmonious without too much speed variation.

However, this is not the case, it varies greatly but locally.

This happens in voids, cracks, and especially amorphous metal.

This explains well Japanese powder's results which has an amorphous core.

So in very specific locations some electrons slow down and just near others accelerate, we can imagine the local impact on magnetism.

It's not enough, both it's also necessary that H/D reach these locations.

We understand better P&F experiments high loading need because a maximum of H/D must reach these locations.

It should be understood that not all locations have sufficient amplitude.

This is related, how to say ? with presence or absence of local superconducting behavior from some electrons.

Classical electrons having a trajectory like an "8" while those superconductive move like a coil.

Strong electronic speed fluctuations meet at interface between these 2 states, these 2 types of trajectories.

Or in other words we need to include a lump of plutonium in our cold fusion reactors to generate sufficient neutrons and gamma radiation to enable a significantly high rate of reaction? Electron screening alone simply doesn't overcome the C-barrier we have to beam in high energy electrons, neutrons, gamma or deuterons to do what, generate a few watts of excess heat? That will still consume more power than it produces. Another solution would be to build another ITER out of palladium or titanium maybe around a fission reactor to provide extra neutrons?