Caveat Emptor (investors beware)


  • The patent says that water is converted into water vapour before it is even injected into the plasma through the electrode channel:

    "A water supply is connected to a water vaporizer (12) which injects water vapor through line (15) to the second flow path (11) contained in the collar body surrounding cathode electrode (3). The second flow path (11) directs the water vapor directly into the plasma reaction zone (5)."


    The hydrogen that is formed and that is not converted to hydrino, is either burned or is collected and used later for fuel:

    "The hydrogen may be used to produce power, or it may be collected and stored for use as a fuel"


    From the website at http://www.enapcoenergy.com/ionizedgasreactor.htm

    it says the exhaust is 'simply' moist air:

    "its exhaust is non-polluting since it is simply moist air"


    But the patent says there would be hydrino in there, hmmm.


    Anyway, when I checked the website some days ago I was disappointed there wasn't any novel

    information beyond the 2008 patent. However there is a small pic of the plasma. What may be the electrodes look

    large and bowl shaped. If so it seems they are diverging from their patent design and perhaps taking a lead from David Lapointe's setup (as seen on Gootube).

  • If all goes wellI further work on the Ionized Gas Reactor will be funded in the near future. The timing is slowed by Covid-19.


    The extensive program will include R&D on several other Green Swans - highly improbable inventions with huge potential impact.


    They include our polymer room temperature superconductors, in spite of the fact all the worldwide Patents have expired. Also, another room temperature superconductor, which was denied patents.


    Those interested in room temperature superconductivity might enjoy U.S Patent 10,211,292 - which, although not involved in our program, finally issued to Johan Prins last year, after a mighty struggle with the USPTO. Prins continues to be a leading light in the fight to open the world of science to new ideas. His book The Physics Delusion: The Urgent Need to Reinterpret Modern Physics - is still in print.


    Our website may be of interest: aesopinstitute.org

  • Some of you will remember synthesit.
    I have been taking there product for

    about 2 weeks to try it and do feel a difference.

    To early talk about benefits but so far no bad side effects.It is on the

    pricey side but I would take it if

    I came down with CV.


    https://synthesit.ru/synthesit-and-treatment-for-coronavirus


    Posting this also to be on the safe

    side so not to lead anyone astray.


    https://medicalxpress.com/news…unlicensed-stem-cell.html

  • Shane
    I did not know there was a buyer

    beware thread.

    I debated posting but since there

    is no cure for CV I thought I should

    post it.Just in case someone with CV

    wanted to give it a shot.

    BTW some of there claims about

    Product are laughable.

    But I still think there could be something to there product.


  • I know you mean well, and want to get the word out to help others...but they are claiming their LENR Iron pill cured COVID. Hopefully you understand why we can not allow their being promoted here?


    In a little while, I will move these posts to where they belong. Will see what my colleagues think, but we may have to trash your posts on Synthesit. If so, nothing personal.

  • I know you mean well, and want to get the word out to help others...but they are claiming their LENR Iron pill cured COVID. Hopefully you understand why we can not allow their being promoted here?

    Maybe that example I posted makes

    it look like they are calling it a cure.

    But on one of there Q and A promotion Videos they made a point

    of stating it is not a cure for CV.

    But stated that it could help in combating C.V.

  • Well at least you pointed out the

    the thread.Did a search but nothing

    came up.I wondered where my

    previous posts went .Thought I had

    posted wrong so why I reposted.

    Anyway I think Synthesit makes

    me calmer like they claim so not

    upset.Maybe all in my head.

  • Le Bob, I just noticed your comment in another thread about Stirling engines.


    You may be interested to know that a Super Stirling engine has been invented by Ken Rauen, AESOP Energy CTO. This engine has not yet been prototyped and details are Confidential. However, it is designed to run on a heat source of perhaps 300 degrees C. Thus, it could prove of interest for LENR. The engine is expected to exceed Carnot. If that proves to be the case it is obvious it will attract a fair amount of interest.


    The original inspiration for a family of engines Rauen has invented is what he calls The Proell Effect. Ken published an article about it some years ago that I have attached.


    Most of his engine designs are intended to run on ambient heat. More than a decade ago he was issued a Patent on the first prototype design. It could not overcome friction but proved the science. He has presented at three AAAS Meetings on the Second Law without refutation. If there is interest - I can attach his Presentation to the Society for Scientific Exploration in a future post.


    A potential licensee is interested in his Super Stirling engine in connection with a heat source unrelated to LENR. A small Proof of Concept prototype is planned and is expected to be constructed later this year.

  • Shane, As I stated earlier I have no objection to being on this thread.


    Ken Rauen, who has invented several engines, ran the lab for Gene Mallove. The Infinite Energy article I posted will give anyone who takes the time to read it an insight into possibilities for new engines that is based on little recognized but very solid new science.


    His Super Stirling design has a major customer waiting for the prototype which is in the works. As you know, all combustion engines have efficiencies rated by a percentage of Carnot. If his Super Stirling exceeds Carnot that is important new science. It may prove of great importance to future commercialization efforts involving LENR.


    I have been evaluating claims of breakthrough energy technologies for more than 40 years. Most are inventor's delusions. A fair number are scams. A very small number are what we call Green Swans - highly improbable innovations with huge potential. Ken's engines may prove to be on of them. Time will tell the tale.


    We are not here seeking investors. However, we are open to eventually having able people join our team - and perhaps assist with rapid replacement of fossil fuels.


    Anyone interested can read more about Ken's Fuel Free Piston Engines and Turbines on our website: aesopinstitute.org

  • I attempted to upload Rauen's Presentation to the Society for Scientific Exploration which is similar to his Presentations at 3 AAAS Meetings on the Second Law of Thermodynamics. However, the file is too big. Anyone who would like a copy, drop me an email: [email protected]


    The Super Stirling is a more recent development than the engines in the Presentation which discusses designs intended to run on ambient heat.


    The latest Super Stirling design requires a heat source. As mentioned earlier, it may prove of interest for converting the heat developed by LENR into electricity.


    An initial potential customer has developed a heat source that supplies about 300 degrees C. They are currently using a Stirling engine and are unhappy with the complexity and efficiency. The Super Stirling is simpler and is expected to exceed Carnot. The prototype will tell the story.

  • Sorry to have missed seeing several posts about the Waters turbine on the earlier thread. I was under the impression the conversation would continue on this thread. The discussion on that thread about food was all I noticed earlier. An automatic email notification a short while ago filled me in.


    The turbine has been dormant for some years, as Waters has been preoccupied with even more promising 24/7 generation technologies. We recently decided to revive it. Once the project begins all the previous data will be reviewed. It seems like a promising project. The prospect of a Biden victory is expected to open the possibility of building 10,000 new wind generators. I appreciate the comments and questions, but do not see further discussion as fruitful as this time as other technologies of greater urgency demand our attention. Before the project is launched. the questions regarding viability will, of course, be addressed.

  • Additional treatment options. S hou ld be uniquely custom tailored for every patient. I . Ivermectin 6mg twice a day for l day 4

    2. Budesonide 1mg/2cc solution v ia nebulizer twice a day for 7 days 5 3. Dexamethasone 6mg once a day for 5 to 7 days6

    4. Blood thinners (i.e. Eliquis or Xarelto) 7

    5.Home O2

    6.. Home IV fluids

    IF POSSIBle

    DR Zelenko mentions blood thinners.

    After taking one bottle of Synthesit at

    one pill a day my blood pressure went from moderately high to

    low medium with no side effects.