Alan Smith wrote "Bedtime reading"
"Science moves on two legs: experiments and theory"
But Science speaks by the written word
Thanks Jed for the endless hours of your interaction
with the multiple authors and reviewers that
ensures that Science is heard clearly.
pages 159-180 are interesting.
Experiments with Li–Ni–Cu alloy, as a novel energy source, are described. The experiments are performed in the 1200–1300◦C
temperature range, using welded metallic containers and also in open tube under inert gas flow. The measured reaction energy is toohigh to be explained by chemical origin. The initial experiments elucidate the properties of this reaction, while the last experimentdemonstrates its continuous operation.
During the last three hours of the experiment, the mismatch between the heating-on time ratios was 0.25. This
means that the reaction power was equivalent to having electric heating on 25% of the time. Since the electric heating
power was 1.2 kW, the average reaction power was 300 W. This corresponds to 30 W/g average reaction power with
respect to the fuel mass. The cumulative reaction energy over these last three hours was over 3 MJ. This amount of reaction energy is larger than any possible chemical reaction.
The Geiger counter indicated an elevated radiation level for only 4–5 s duration, approximately coinciding with
the largest peak seen in Fig. 23. The counting level was normal before and after this brief event. During this elevated
Geiger counter reading, a buzzing sound was heard from the reactor, similar to the sound of electric arcing.
IIRC, the theory is Ni + 2e (from Li) => Fe
Celani's derivation of the mass of the ZBW electron..9 x 10 (-31) looks good
but the current of 19.79 Amps looks huge to me..is that because the charge is whirling around at light c?
yes : I = q/T = q c / L
q = electron charge
T = Zitterbewegung period
L = Compton wavelength