pheraps it can be interesting to check this out. it is an article where an italian phisicist that does some hypotesis on qx working and give some suggestion for low results consistency
https://gradientitemporali.wor…t-qx-cambio-di-paradigma/
english translation
the heat generated by the control system and dissipated by the cooling system is warmth that from the thermal balance point of view theoretically is perfectly recoverable with COP 1 because if I have, if I dissipate 60W consumed 60W, then the same 60W I go to recover with a heat exchanger and is out of It does not have to do anything with what is the thermal balance and therefore the COP of the E-Cat, but it is clear that it is a problem to be solved because if one buys an E-Cat to make electricity, retrieve the It does not matter to him and so, so it's not the point. As a result, it is a problem to be solved, in the sense that ... and this is precisely the point where we are focusing; that is to say the maximum because that big white box that you have seen today, which is now the control system, must be reduced to a packet of cigarettes to govern ... anyway keep in mind that this control system here is able to govern a thousand of E-Cat, so the relationship is quite relevant. But the big problem is to reduce the size, because it is not ... we have a huge energy intensity at the reactor level because we produce, today we produced 20W in one, ... pretty much a tenth of a centimeter cubic. Of course, a remarkable density.
This is ridiculous, Master Control System and Main Control Hardware and Software for the energy sector is available in any size, shape, color and, if necessary, in any desired flavor. You do not have to reinvent the wheel to get 20 or 60 watts under control (even if it's 1000 units), just buy them for example here and integrate it:
http://www.ni.com/de-de/shop.html
https://www.slideshare.net/san…risnl-microgrid-symposium
Quotehuge energy intensity at the reactor level because we produce, today we produced 20W i
Yeah, that's of course heavy, 20W 
, you need a master's degree in nuclear physics and Einstein's brain to get a device with such tremendous power under control!
Display Morepheraps it can be interesting to check this out. it is an article where an italian phisicist that does some hypotesis on qx working and give some suggestion for low results consistency
https://gradientitemporali.wor…t-qx-cambio-di-paradigma/
english translation
So the way I read this is that an RF signal (Tesla impulse) and "wavetrains" set the stage for alchemy transformations, and the final piece needed to make it happen is: "In particular, one must realize that there is a very important catalytic wave that is consciously or unconsciously generated by humans through their intentionality and energy. In particular from those beings endowed with energetic surplus and acute sensitivity that can act as voluntary or involuntary “activators”.
The article is about Rossi, his Ecat, and how it really works, so I would assume that Rossi is one of these rare "endowed" people, and his thought energy (catalytic waves) is the final piece needed to make the QX/Ecats work. Do I have this right? If so, I think we will see this on JONP soon, with a patent application soon to follow!
Anyways, the author does himself no good by totally whitewashing Doral. He would have the reader think the 1MW worked great, and IH just did not want to pay him.
[Menichella] Obsolete. And as for the differences with the Hot-Cat: I remember that at the time there were so many discussions on the blogs on the cat-mouse technology. Did you bring it that with you - so to speak - or is that a thing of the past too?
[Rossi] It [could have been] observed today on the oscilloscope. That's because we have an electric field with an electricity with particles that move only on one direction - in other words polarized on one only direction with a pulsing rhythm - and in those pulsations there's the game of the cat and the mouse.
Regarding: The explanation of the Cat and Mouse synchronization.
In this paragraph above Rossi explains how the Cat and Mouse synchronization method works.
This explanation is clear as day.
First, Rossi says that the particles are polarized to move in just one direction.
This is explained here in this post.
The process by which the proton decays in LENR
The initial high tension arc discharge produces a phase transition in the polaritons that allows energy to flow in just one direction.
The subsequent complex sine signal as seen on the oscilloscope ( it could have been observed today on the oscilloscope.) is the method by which the SPPs are synchronized in the three QX reactors. This synchronization signal forces the three QX reactors to share a common state. These three reactors can be thought of as being entangled by that synchronization signal. The initial arc generated polarization of the polaritons insures that the multi-reactor syronication is achieved.
Also see how the arc activates the LENR reaction and how self sustain mode occurs.
Display Morepheraps it can be interesting to check this out. it is an article where an italian phisicist that does some hypotesis on qx working and give some suggestion for low results consistency
https://gradientitemporali.wor…t-qx-cambio-di-paradigma/
english translation
Rossi produces two signals: first, an initial high tension nanoscale arc to initiate the LENR reaction over all three QX reactors, and two, a complex sine signal to synchronize the three quarks into a common reactor output response call the cat and mouse method.
All this complicated technology can be explained by currently understood science,
