New Patent Filed by Leif Holmlid

  • Wyttenbach may I ask... have you looked at the scalar meson resonances such as the f0(500), f0(980) resonance with regard your SO(4) theory approach or are these kinds of resonances currently out side the scope of that approach for now?


    When I consider these things this way I realize how big the job can be. But if it’s relevant to the processes associated with LENR it could be interesting.

  • Wyttenbachmay I ask... have you looked at the scalar meson resonances such as the f0(500), f0(980) resonance with regard your SO(4) theory approach or are these kinds of resonances currently out side the scope of that approach for now?


    I did only model kaon, pion,muon so far. But now we understand the SO(4) orbit model and it should be easy to identify the measured energies.

    The main problem is that nuclear charge does not couple the way SM believes. Thus we always first must check how the values where measured! E.g. the Z bosons is a resonance of the proton 3D/4D mass that couples with double the charge radius what gives 8 times the coupling mass.

    Thus it is impossible to draw any conclusion from measurements only if you have no clue (as SM has) about the real structure of matter.

  • A new preprint paper has been submitted on ResearchGate:


    Detection of muons and neutral kaons from ultra-dense hydrogen H(0) by lepton pair-production

    Leif Holmlid and Sveinn Olafsson

    https://www.researchgate.net/p…by_lepton_pair-production


    Quote

    Muons from spontaneous and laser-induced nuclear processes in ultra-dense hydrogen H(0) have previously been studied by energy spectroscopy of the beta-like signal in solid and multilayered converters. Laser-induced muons from H(0) were recently shown to have >100 MeV energy in separate studies. The high-energy cut-off of the beta-like energy distribution is constant independent of the material used as converter. The signal is thus not caused by atomic or nuclear effects like muon capture. This result also proves a strict limit in the energy available, as in a beta-emission process or in a decay process of a nuclear particle. The zero signal high-energy cut-off is close to the electron mass of 511 keV, using beta-decay electrons for the calibration. The signal has a strongly varying gain in the converter depending on the converter material and its history, which indicates particle creation by lepton pair-production. The signal in the photomultiplier is due to leptons (electrons and positrons) penetrating through the glass. The particle energy distributions observed are characterized by their cut-off energy due to pair-production and an almost statistical form, which indicates step-wise pair production. The energy for the pair-production is derived from the kinetic energy of the muons of 10-100 MeV and from the decay of the muons at 105 MeV. The particles moving to the photomultiplier detector and giving the beta-like muon signal may be both muons and long lived neutral kaons K0L , depending on the distance and the experiment. Kaons K0L give shortlived neutral kaons K0S in metal parts and finally muons.

  • If I understand correctly from a very preliminary read, what is mainly observed in the experiments is not the result of beta decay reactions from muon capture as previously suggested, but actually the production of up to 50 electron-positron pairs per muon through an apparently seldom studied decay mechanism, which gives an energy distribution similar to (but not quite exactly like) standard beta decay reactions.


    From this it sounds like harnessing electricity directly could be more efficient than previously expected. In the experiments up to 1015 mesons per laser pulse are observed (source); at 10 Hz and at 1 to a few muons per meson that's potentially a large number of electrons to be harvested.

  • If I understand correctly from a very preliminary read, what is mainly observed in the experiments is not the result of beta decay reactions from muon capture as previously suggested, but actually the production of up to 50 electron-positron pairs per muon through an apparently seldom studied decay mechanism, which gives an energy distribution similar to (but not quite exactly like) standard beta decay reactions.


    From this it sounds like harnessing electricity directly could be more efficient than previously expected. In the experiments up to 1015 mesons per laser pulse are observed (source); at 10 Hz and at 1 to a few muons per meson that's potentially a large number of electrons to be harvested.


    That would be coherent with what we have already known, that the interest and support behind Norront Fusion is mainly due to the possibility of harvesting electricity directly from the reaction.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Was wondering how this would apply to Holmid's/Wyttenback's/Mills' work or if it discredits it.


    The azimuthal 5th force is speculative since 2001..

    There may be other valid but speculative explanations related to the Meissner effect..

    Mills has some explanation..in GUTCP

    Holmlid quotes Hirsch 2010, quotes Nikulov 2001,


    https://link.springer.com/cont…7%2Fs10948-009-0531-4.pdf


    Nikulov [9] correctly recognized that this is a fundamental unanswered question in the conventional theory of superconductivity.

    He postulates the existence of an azimuthal ‘quantum force’ Fq that acts on the superfluid electrons
    when the system is cooled below Tc, that forces the canonical momentum to change to satisfy the quantum condition equation (38)

    (or equivalently, that forces the macroscopic wave function to be single-valued)

    , given by Fq = pω (39)
    with ω−1 the time scale over which the canonical momentum change..

  • Slightly over my head lol, but I'm seeing Holmid is pretty much QM and you merge the phenomina as part of another force. At the moment glad to see where all this goes. In the case these other theories don't pan out, Holmid's approach releases the potential for a hydrino like energy flow up to a more dense source. Without completely overturning current physics models?