I just found out that there is a Norront Fusion Energy website. I don't know since when it has been live.
New Patent Filed by Leif Holmlid
-
-
I don't know since when it has been live.
"Since 2008, Norrønt has been one of the leading companies on hydrogen/deuterium and Condense matter research to produce charged particles through annihilation of hydrogen clusters."
Never heard of them myself.
-
S. Ólafsson and Sindre-Zeiner Gundersen have submitted a number of posters for ICCF=21
-
Never heard of them myself.
There is a Norront website which according to the Wayback Machine has existed for a long time. Perhaps they were locally known in their own field, but I don't think they've been annihilating hydrogen clusters since 2008 (knowingly, at least).
S. Ólafsson and Sindre-Zeiner Gundersen have submitted a number of posters for ICCF=21
Zeiner-Gundersen is from Norront Fusion Energy.
Poster abstracts are here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…uUL0v3NrkY7BPYPKDA_a?dl=0
SZG's:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…ndre-1-Rydberg+Matter.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…r-Distance+dependency.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…-3-Poster-Pulse+shape.pdf
Ólafsson's:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…hat+is+Rydberg+matter.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…ctroweak+interactions.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…nn-3-Poster-Volcanism.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…4-Poster-Conductivity.pdf
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…er+experimental+setup.pdf
June 5 ICCF-21 program:
-
-
-
I seem to remember that Holmlid published some speculations about energy output from his reactor. Does anyone know where to find it?
-
His output energy calculations are usually with laser triggering taking into account only the energy that goes into the apparatus (not the overall efficiency of the system) but in his latest paper on muon-catalyzed D+D fusion (available on Researchgate) he suggests a kaon and muon signal of 1015 / s.
The average laser power is 3W (300 mJ/pulse at 10 Hz). If the particles have an average energy of 10 MeV that would be an average output power of 1600W and a gain of 533 relatively to the laser power.
From this earlier paper (using protium) a gain of 700 relatively to the laser pulse energy is calculated: https://www.worldscientific.co…10.1142/S0218301316500853
In the Swedish patent discussed in this thread he suggests that accumulating larger amounts of ultra-dense hydrogen makes the reaction more efficient.
A different "perturbing field" than the EM field of a Nd:YAG pulsed laser may be used, like a "purely magnetic" or "purely electric" field.
-
-
I just found that a world patent application for the Swedish one granted and discussed in this thread was also filed and recently published:
APPARATUS FOR GENERATING MUONS WITH INTENDED USE IN A FUSION REACTOR
WIPO Patent Application WO/2018/093312
-
I tried to graphically summarize the total process given in the patent application by Leif Holmlid, in this specific case for deuterium.
EDIT 1: I've been made aware that the K0 (neutral kaons) have decay pathways where π0 (neutral pions) are formed, which would each decay into two energetic photons (gamma ray). So the actual meson decay shower should be more complex than actually shown in the diagram. Such very energetic gammas would also cause photoemission.
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2018/listings/rpp2018-list-K-zero-L.pdf
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2018/listings/rpp2018-list-pi-zero.pdf
EDIT 2: following suggestions from others, I've updated the diagram.
-
A few days ago a new paper by Leif Holmlid got published. This one is not open access.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.06.116
Rotational emission spectroscopy in ultra-dense hydrogen p(0) and pxDy(0): groups pN, pD2, p2D and (pD)N
-
... Received March 2017, accepted June 2018.
-
-
Troubles with peer review [eg procedure slowing down due to an author's illness]
-
Please layout (graphically represent) what these molecules look like as follows:
pN, pD (identified previously) , pD2, p2D and (pD)2
What does the p designate in the formulas above? Does this mean that the UDH molecule can be formed from a mixture of deuterium and protum?
-
Holmlid did indeed mention in a paper submitted at a later time but published earlier of his health problems. This was also reported in the previous page in this thread.
Anyway, besides results in optical spectrometry I think the most relevant practical observation in the latest one is that the so-far observed meson-producing nuclear processes apparently take place in the small non-superfluid H(0) clusters. In a previous paper (open access) it was pointed out that a transition temperature exists above which the H(0) is present only in the form of small clusters, which in turn should imply that such reactions would be more easily seen above that temperature. This might be consistent with similar observations in the LENR field.
Please layout (graphically represent) what these molecules look like as follows:
pN, pD (identified previously) , pD2, p2D and (pD)2In the paper he provides this diagram showing pD pairs in the cluster. I could try making a clearer representation in 3D of the other ones, but you'll have to wait.
What does the p designate in the formulas above? Does this mean that the UDH molecule can be formed from a mixture of deuterium and protum?
p is for proton. It indeed means that UDH can be formed from a mixture of deuterium and protium.
He's also explicitly pointed out in his patent (linked in the opening post in this thread) that the gas can be a protium-deuterium mixture.
EDIT: attached some representations both from Holmlid and that I've made.
-
Holmlids crackpottetry is actually very sad.
Holmlids work is a true milestone for theoretical and experimental physics - far more important than the wasted money at CERN.
His spin matter can be perfectly explained by the 4D model and the recently found quantization of the proton magnetic moment. The problem with his former explanation with a string like H/D filament are well known, as it failed (either or cluster or string both at same time is impossible) to explain the planar clusters he measured with TOF:
Holmlid certainly measures interesting new facts, but as long a he tries to fit standard model theory to it will remain shaky.
-
Holmlid certainly measures interesting new facts, but as long a he tries to fit standard model theory to it will remain shaky.
Wyttenbach How do you explain the violation of the conservation of the baryon number in these experiments? Thanks
-
Quote
Holmlids work is a true milestone for theoretical and experimental physics - far more important than the wasted money at CERN.
Oh, OK. Good to know. Homlid's work is a milestone and the Large Hadron Collider is wasted billions. Got it. Like astrology much? If we have that, why bother with the Webb telescope? After the Hubble was such a waste, right? And given homeopathy, do we really need western medical research what with its microbes, chemicals and other messy stuff?
Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.