Energy 2.0 Webcast with Andrea Rossi
-
I notice comments are disabled.
-
What strikes is Rossi's answer on how 3 quarks were connected. He messed up in series and parallel and after a while you understand that it actually was in parallel. Now think of the quarkx as analogous device. When the control circuit senses feedback how would it know which unit it is coming from? Please don't tell they all behave as perfect twins.
At some point chubby guys on the 2.0 panel asking about feedback and Rossi answers that it is a complex feedback. How this feedback was fed over a single wire during the test from 3 units!?
-
So the truth is a) that Rossi has nothing.
B) feedback is not important which makes quark x as complex as fluorescent lamp.
-
Perhaps I missunderstand but is his reactor a bit like a spark gap? Problem I see is how to ensure all three strike arcs at the same time. Typically as you crank up the voltage wouldn't one arc over first causing the source voltage to drop preventing arcs forming in the others?
-
What strikes is Rossi's answer on how 3 quarks were connected. He messed up in series and parallel and after a while you understand that it actually was in parallel. Now think of the quarkx as analogous device. When the control circuit senses feedback how would it know which unit it is coming from? Please don't tell they all behave as perfect twins.
At some point chubby guys on the 2.0 panel asking about feedback and Rossi answers that it is a complex feedback. How this feedback was fed over a single wire during the test from 3 units!?
No return signal to the controller was shown on the oscilloscope.
The QX is like a piece of firewood, you heat it up and it burns, you cool it off and it cools.
RF simulation on and it produces heat, RF simulation off and it does not produce heat except for a heat after death effect.
The power level is controlled by the voltage supplied in the initial activation pulse.
-
Perhaps I missunderstand but is his reactor a bit like a spark gap? Problem I see is how to ensure all three strike arcs at the same time. Typically as you crank up the voltage wouldn't one arc over first causing the source voltage to drop preventing arcs forming in the others?
IMHO, there is no wires used to interconnect the three QX reactors. All controls are done by wireless RF signals.
See this video for an example
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
-
So the truth is a) that Rossi has nothing.
B) feedback is not important which makes quark x as complex as fluorescent lamp.
Yes, the QX is a HID bulb but it has a LENR runtime fuel source produced by the electrodes that amplifies the heat output of the bulb.
-
Quote
The QX is like a piece of firewood,
Except that firewood doesn't need electricity from the mains to combust to become ash while every one of Rossi's kludges requires connection to the mains and has a heater of some sort.
-
Yes, the QX is a HID bulb but it has a LENR runtime fuel source produced by the electrodes that amplifies the heat output of the bulb.
But 'Rossysays' TM it provides complex feedback that make me worried. Full disclosure: I was a fan of him just prior the demo.
-
Well Max, as a Ducth friend of mine used to say, ""Ve gets too soon auldt undt too late schmart"
-
But 'Rossysays' TM it provides complex feedback that make me worried. Full disclosure: I was a fan of him just prior the demo.
There is much that Rossi says that is unintentionally wrong or intentionally misleading. Is trying to protect his IP fraud?
-
@maryyugo I am always flip when somebody is trying to say one person to another on being smart. To me being smart is to die with a smile in the face That of course takes different things in each individual case while some people are guaranteed that from the beginning but I would not call them lucky.
-
But 'Rossysays' TM it provides complex feedback that make me worried. Full disclosure: I was a fan of him just prior the demo.
Rossisays (TM)
Max, here is a critic website about the Dott. Rossi and his "invention".
It's a good summary. After reading that, you can make you own mind up why Dott. Rossi has done and is doing such demos and giving these fantastic nonsense interviews.
-
Shame they stopped updating it around 2011.
-
Shame they stopped updating it around 2011.
Alan, that's a very intelligent comment and for sure I know why I'm reading almost all of you posts (as a follower), 'cause they often contain a lot of information "between the lines"
Would be interesting, what they would write about the Demonstration-Show-Presentation (DPS) at Stockolm, isn't it?
BTW: (use CTRL-F in the browser, and type in some numbers ...)
- "Early 2012 Australian aerospace engineer Ian Bryce investigated the reports of the conducted tests 2012 and found ..."
- "Specialist literature regarding the "energy-catalyzer" is not available (as of March 2012)."
- "In a business entry from 2012 an address in New Boston is mentioned for Leonardo Corporation."
- "Defkalion intends to begin producing E-cats in 2012, ..."
- "In January 2012 it became known that the University of Bologna cancelled the planned..."
- "A group of researchers (Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Bo Höistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegnér and Hanno Essén) claims to have repeated the experiment successfully in March 2014. Apparently, no ionizing radiation was detected."
- "http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf"
- "This page was last modified on 29 June 2015"
Emphasis added by me
-
It seems that Rossi has done a good enough job protecting his IP that mo one here knows if it works or how it might work.
I can think of a way to measure the feedback and control individual reactors but it is idle speculation and like most of the comments not very entertaining.
It looks like you will have to wait a while for sufficient data to prove anything.
-
“No one here knows if it works or how it might work.”
And yet there is a thread with over 900 posts arguing over the technical details of the taped-up sprinkler fitting and other random apparatus. Pretty typical.
