The New Plasmoid Paradigm

Quote from Shane D.

There are many reasons people post anonymously. Your name Ed Lewis for instance, is one example. It is short. Many have longer names they shorten for posting purposes and appear anonymous because of. Also, your first and last name are common English language names derived from equally common names, or vice versa, in/from other countries. And some are embarrassed by their real names because they are not like yours. Then we have those that initially went by their real name, but after they were tracked by trolls and threatened, switched user names.

Lots of other reasons I could get into, but the point being...get over it Ed. Same goes for anyone else hung up on this anonymity thing. Judge posters here by the content of their post, and not what they go by. No way to hide being ignorant, or a troll..neither of which will be tolerated here for long.

That said, thank you for contributing. BTW, is there any difference between what you and Bob Greenyer are proposing?

What is your name? Anybody who reads my articles knows my name. I am not posting anonymously here.

Display More

Who is LION. Are you posting anonymously?

I kind of decided if people comment on my posts anonymously, I probably won`t read it.

Over the decades I`ve been studying plasmoids, I`ve found that there are people who are anonymously or sort of anonymously filling up the available sites, news groups, or mediums such as this blog with stuff that doesn`t make much sense, is often misleading, and is often wrong.

For people reading this blog because you want to actually find good information and news, try to stick to reading information from people with

solid track records, who show that they are trying to be honest by giving enough information so that people can understand and replicate what they do, and

who can prove what they are saying by producing experimental evidence that can be verified. Why listen to people if you don`t even know who they are and can`t verify what they say?

After this field of transmutation or anomalous energy effects started after P and F, group after group and individual after individual keep popping up, asserting claims, refusing to provide evidence or enough information to replicate, stay around for years saying the same thing year after year without producing anything verifiable, and give the field a bad reputation. They take most of the attention and don`t produce anything. At the beginning, people who led the field such as Matsumoto and Shoulders were generally ignored although they did good experiments that could be replicated. They tried to explain to people who would listen how to replicate their experiments.

That they were doing good research is apparent in that people could independently replicate and verify their claims: for example Matsumoto replicated

some of Ken Shoulder`s discharge experimental results. In the following 20 years, group after group keep finding the same BL-like plasmoids markings and effects they discovered. Some of them cited Matsumoto and/or Shoulders, some didn`t. As I explained in the last long post, some of Priem et al`s markings look amazingly like some of the more unusual ones of Matsumoto that were published in Fusion Technology.

I hope this helps people: In general:

1) Listen to the people who reveal who they are and have solid track records including verifiable results. If they have published and can show experimental

evidence for their claims, this helps you to know that maybe what they say is worth considering.

2) Even better, listen to those people who have their experiments and results replicated.

3) If people are presenting theories or models, these have to have testable predictions. If they can show that their predictions were verified, this is better. For example, in early 1992, I came up with the theory that microscopic BL produced the tracks that Matsumoto said he found and caused the transmutation effects he described. This was before I saw a picture of any of his traces or any of Shoulders` traces. I told him and started to publish this theory. I predicted that these microscopic objects would behave in the anomalous ways that natural BL do such as passing through materials without damaging

the materials and also boring tunnels and making pits. I wrote they`d emit beams, convert to electricity, and tend to form typical BL configurations such as

strings of BL. Those predictions were verified by Matsumoto and then later by Urutskoev and others showing these plasmoids are micro BL.

4) Finally, remember that any general theory of transmutation effects has to explain the behavior of anomalous plasmoids and how anomalous plasmoids cause transmutation since these plasmoids

are observed in all the kinds of transmutation experiments I am aware of (including Iwamura`s). I studied pictures that Iwamura published and could see typical plasmoid marks in them.

If you are really interested in the subject of plasmoids, can show me that you`ve actually read some of my articles and studied what I am trying to explain, and don`t keep your identity secret, I`ll probably take your posts more seriously. Will

more people take up experimental study of plasmoids and post your results here for discussion?