ASTOUNDED - Atypical Spheromak Triggering Of Unambiguous Nuclear Derived Energy Discharges (Rossi's Mirror Effect Reactor and more!)

Quote from Alan Smith

I attach a couple of photographs I took in the summer, one of a dental X-Ray plate exposed to a LION tube 'post event' (grey) and another micro photograph of the inside of a fuel-tube fragment.

There are some really small and sharp dots on the X-Ray plate.

Most tubes have cylindrical shape whereas a plate usually is flat and not very flexible.

That would make it difficult to achieve good resolution.

Was the plate flexible or was the tube flattened?

Did you make a duplicate to verify same pattern?

Do you have any idea what caused the dots?

Axil's "strange particle tracks" to me most of all looks like scratches on the photographic emulsion and and some fibers, aka dust.

The x-ray film packages in Axil's LION picture are very similar to this genuine Italian product made in China:

http://stardentequ.com/en/product-detail.php?tnid=891

The big pouch contains the developing fluid that is squeezed over to the film after exposure.

Very handy, no darkroom needed and we cannot blame the artifacts on sloppy darkroom work.

Of course, we can call into doubt the quality of the probably knock off x-ray films.

In ordinary x-ray photography you have a small x-ray source that emits a cone of x-rays.

The object to be examined is positioned at some distance from the source.

The film is positioned as close as possible and behind the object relative to the source.

The closeness is essential for the sharpness of the image.

In this case your presumed source is the object itself, the term for this is autoradiography.

Thus the distance from the source to the object cannot contribute to the sharpness of the image. You will get the sharpest possible picture by pressing the emulsion against the object. Obviously this is not what is happening here. Added to the thickness of the plastic container is the varying distance due to no pressure being applied. This makes it improbable that even a point source could give an exposure corresponding to the smallest dots.

Alan, you did not say if an image could be reproduced, i.e. made two times i a row.

Also, images should also have been done on a leftover piece of the square tube or tea can or whatever it was.

As for the pairs, two dots always make up a pair, don't they?

...

I took the trouble to scan Bob's video:

http://e-catworld.com/2018/01/…with-lion-new-mfmp-video/

At around 40 minutes was the tea tin. What the heck has the tea tin to do with the LION reactor?

Somebody must be stupid here. Is it me perhaps?

Which reminds me, I also saw Bob pointing out various pairs of dots. Yes, it looks quite dotty.

But it has a natural explanation. The eye and brain are hardwired to detect patterns. Once you start to look for pairs you will see lots of them and you will be blind to other patterns, like triplets.

Quote from bocijn

Director

Thanks for the thread.. it seems to intertwine with the lion video

The charge cluster theory has been around for some time

Hal Fox 1997.

HIGH-DENSITY CHARGE CLUSTERS AND ENERGY CONVERSION RESULTS

http://www.padrak.com/ine/FB97_1.html

The idea that 5000v input can give an embedded proton 9 Mevs is astounding.

I guess this means 5V would only give 9 keV..?

but 9 keV can do something in a brittle hydrided lattice structure.

This cluster idea can explsin why Dash et al got accelerated nuclear decay not only below the electrolyte

but also above the electrolyte with electrolysed uranium

I can't see any paired holes in their uranium but I guess the charge cluster migrated above the waterline.

Changes In The Radioactivity, Topography, And Surface Composition

lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DashJchangesint.pdf

Display More

Somehow, the ultra energy and matter dense charged clusters of Kenneth Shoulders were capable of inducing a warp drive like effect that could accelerate entrained positive ions to ultra high speeds. This imparted to them tremendous kinetic energies for zero or minimal additional input cost. When such protons or positive ions smash into matter, nuclear reactions can occur. However, there are MULTIPLE other mechanisms that can induce nuclear reactons. An EVO strike on an embrittled target is like filling a shotgun cartrige with a slug, buck shot, small pellets, and custom projectiles just put holes in a paper target - overkill. But you can be sure a whole range of effects will happen.

EVOs, at least grey or black ones, can fly right through a reactor wall. They are the perfect explanation for emissions from a source outside of the reactor.

For starters, why should there be any Electrum Validum in an arbitrary tea tin?

Just checked in mine. Nope, just the usual black tea.

"Kenneth R. Shoulders has received five US Patents for his discovery and development High Density Charge Cluster (HDCC) technology. Shoulders describes the HDCC entity as "a relatively discrete, self-contained, negatively charged, high density state of matter... [a bundle of electrons that] appears to be produced by the application of a high electrical field between a cathode and an anode." He has given it the name "Electrum Validum" (EV), meaning "strong electron", from the Greek "elektron" (electronic charge) and the Latin "valere" (to be strong, having power to unite)."

No anodes or cathodes in my tea tin either.

"However my tea tin does does not have a high voltage source with two electrodes nearby or deuterium-loaded palladium"

Here is the LION reactor:

No tea tin in sight.

And just out of the blue, here a China tourist has returned with a souvenir tea tin: