Any thought to going here after you have a working formula Alan?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…ty_surface-emitting_laser
High-power VCSELs
The LION experiment
-
-
Alan,
Why is it we have to read ECW to see what you are up to?
-
It is busy times amongst the green fields and rabbit warrens of Essex with all manner of hydrogen experiments taking place in a lab not quite yet all put together in the month of moving in. As it has been rightly said, science is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration. Three experienced dedicagted guys on their feet in the lab day in day out for weeks is a very substantial committment of value to making progress. Each hour on ones feet at a lab bench is worth weeks of armchair time if such efforts are even comparable at all.
-
Wot he says!
-
It is busy times amongst the green fields and rabbit warrens of Essex with all manner of hydrogen experiments taking place in a lab not quite yet all put together in the month of moving in. As it has been rightly said, science is 10% inspiration and 90% perspiration. Three experienced dedicagted guys on their feet in the lab day in day out for weeks is a very substantial committment of value to making progress. Each hour on ones feet at a lab bench is worth weeks of armchair time if such efforts are even comparable at all.
Just imagine how productive Einstein could have been if he had spent more time at a lab bench, and less sitting and thinking...
What makes you think that one has to be at a lab bench to perspire?
Anyway, according to wikiquote, Edison said "Genius: one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration."
-
Wot he says!
Reminds me, that Rossi says for many years that he is working 16 hours every day!
So, if you wanna be same level with Rossi...
-
It takes a lot of work to stay afloat when you don't know how to swim.
-
That is a low blow H-G. Fight fair and keep your punches up.
-
Alan,
Why is it we have to read ECW to see what you are up to?
I understand that there may be a delay between Looking For Heat undertaking a project and reporting the results. My main concern is that negative results may not be communicated at all. This is something that really distorts a field because positive results are guaranteed to be shouted from the rooftops even if they later turn out to be mistaken.
The huge advantage of live science such as we see from the MFMP is that the public gets to share in both the the successes and failures of research. It is educational for most people (if they keep an open mind). One of the reasons that the LENR peanut gallery is so apt to cherry-pick is that they don't have this type of experience.
-
Reporting negative results is not a problem to LFH. While there is always a temptation to do this, don't forget that a negative result may occupy only a few paragraphs, whereas a positive result demands more. So bigger piles of words are more easily tripped over.
As for shouting from the rooftops, I have no head for heights.
-
The advancement of LENR know how has been near impossible in these last decades because of the profit motive that most experimenters operate under. No matter how hard these people work during their lives, their know how is lost to the grave. The open source LENR development method where all research progress is passed on to others to continue the work is the only way that LENR can advance and spead, and where this sucessful LENR research can be protected from loss, openly documented, and passed on to others.
I whole heartedly agree. But then why do you seem to support Rossi, who represents the polar opposite? Can you post this message on JONP and we can see his response?
