The science behind LENR looks all firmly established now, a great series reviewing the literature by NASA/SPAWAR scientists. We need to focus down now on using all the data to come up with a fully functional reactor design.
US Navy (SPAWAR)/Global Energy Corporation/LENR
-
-
Lots of interesting info in Forsley's video presentation. Working with the US Naval Surface Warfare Center (Dahlgren) with it's 5700 scientists and engineers. Funded by the DOE. Developing a space reactor based on LENR principles with NASA, at their GRC facility. It was almost a year ago the USN associated "Proceeding Magazine", gave a second place award for an LENR essay. Who says the government is no longer interested in, or funding LENR?
Amazing this stays under the radar so to speak. You would think some journalist could piece it all together, and make a story of it.
-
Quote
We need to focus down now on using all the data to come up with a fully functional reactor design.
You mean one that actually works?
Shane D. Before I spend any time looking at Forsley's video, does it show a real (not a rendering) functioning LENR or hybrid LENR/fission reactor? If so, a time index for that would be helpful or any other time index you think may be helpful to a skeptic. Thanks.
-
Before I spend any time looking at Forsley's video, does it show a real (not a rendering) functioning LENR or hybrid LENR/fission reactor? If so, a time index for that would be helpful or any other time index you think may be helpful to a skeptic. Thanks.
Best you not watch it. We like our skeptics uninformed. They are more fun that way.
-
Best you not watch it
Hear not LENR See no LENR Speak lots of... SOT.
-
Defensive are we? Little or nothing to show, do we? I am sure if there were anything convincing in that video about that program, several of you believers would leap to highlight it. Oh well, maybe I'll listen to the sound on the video next time I need to rearrange my closet.
-
Please correct me if I missed it because, of course, I never read anything, in fact I can't read at all so be sure to include more pictures.
But then, I never read anything, remember?
You're far beyond parody Yugo. Wilfully ignorant, and almost unworthy of any response at all.
I have genuinely been wondering recently whether you are more deserving of pity than mockery. But ultimately - you're such a tool, that it's hard to resist.
Suffice to say we're only two months into the year, and already there's been two 'anti-reading denials'... Boors Bingo 2019 is shaping up to be a good 'un.
Two lines are filled in already, I think the four corners, and maybe even The Big X. Your 'scatalogical issues' are off the charts. Even more so than last time,
unbelivably. -
Good ideas never die
[From left to right: 2009 Larry Forsley hybrid reactor korean review, Wiki page, 1989 Science. 2009 KAIST request for neutron spectrum is obvious - "235U's response to absorbing a neutron is well know. E.Teller". ]
-
Cold fusion in disguise / US Navy in disguise
ELECTROLYSIS REACTORS SYSTEM THAT INCORPORATES THERMAL AND GALVANIC
CONTROLS TO PROVIDE IMPROVED HYDROGEN PRODUCTION, STORAGE, AND
CONTROLLED RELEASE IN SUITABLE CONDUCTIVE INTERSTITIAL METALLIC
HYDRIDE MATERIALS
Frank E. Gordon
Harper J. Whitehouse
Stanislaw Szpak
-
Harper J Whitehouse
The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy:
6466515
5007030
4894795
4792787
4768156
4546249
4334277
4282579
4270025
4267580
4196448
4164023
4100498
4099148
4010360
3940602
-
Stanislaw Szpak died at 95 shortly after the application was published in August,2016
-
“While development of NanoStar and Nanomite is ongoing, GEC initial focus is the product development and commercialization of Small Modular Generators (SMG’s) using Hybrid Fusion technology. GEC is currently negotiating several new SMG construction contracts ranging from 250MWe to 5GWe around the world.”
I was (perhaps erroneously) under the impression that the GeNie reactor was on ice, but apparently not. -
This was flagged by Curbina in the NASA thread, but just to make it explicit, there are a couple of really interesting GEC presentations linked here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse…ose-any-other-name-goble/
They’re Google Drive links, so they might not stick around. -
GEC suggesting that they’ll manufacture entire vehicles is a little odd. Automotive manufacturing is a terribly capital intensive and punishing business with a ton of operating leverage and potentially large period on period volume fluctuations due to the high elasticity of intertemporal substitution of automotive vehicles. PACCAR, for example, is best in class, but still gets whacked every cycle. Why wouldn’t you just partner with the best manufacturers?
edit: Unless, of course, I’ve misunderstood what they mean by ‘make’. -
-
NASA updated [2016] Prof. Forsley
-
Further developments continues [... 2016]
-
THE undischargeable battery -- SPAWAR and US submarines/AUVs very happy - from 2016 no more nuke impellers ...
-
Dahlgren, 2018
-
The JWK, SPAWAR, Navy. GEC, Univ. of Maryland, PineScie, Vantage Partners, DTRA, ONR, DoE and NNSA, NSWC Dahlgren, China Lake, COLD FUSION research group has released an executive summary disclosing a research partner timeline.
I'm trying to find a few items:
“Metal Interactions with Low Z Gasses” (2010-2012)
“Study of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions I & II” (2008-2012)
“LENR Materials Design and Characterization” (Dahlgren 2015- )
IBA Industrial (2017-2018)
“Advanced Energy and Propulsion Research and Development” (NSWC Indian Head 2020- )
GEC Research Partners
Past and Present Partners
NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) Pre-AEC: (1989-2014)
– “Advanced Energy Conversion (AEC) Project” AEC: (2014 - )• Develop a non-actinide space power system
• Understand Condensed Matter Nuclear Reactions
• US Navy (SPAWAR) (1989-2012)
– NASA GRC and SPAWAR different processes, similar nuclear results
– Additional funding provided by DTRA, ONR, DoE and NNSA
• JWK/NAVY NCRADA (SPAWAR) (2008-2012)
– “Study of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions I & II”
• JWK/NAVY NCRADA (China Lake)
– “Metal Interactions with Low Z Gasses” (2010-2012)
• JWK/NAVY NCRADA (NSWC Dahlgren) (2015- )
– “LENR Materials Design and Characterization”
• DFT Model of LENR Active Materials
• Correlate Co-deposition and B Field effects
• Univ of Maryland (Tim Koeth, PhD) (2015-2016)
– < 3 MeV LINAC unstable for our needs
• DoE Jefferson National Lab (2016-2017)
– AEC Project schedule and JLAB schedule did not match up
• DoE Argonne National Lab (2017)
– Van de Graaff generator unstable and did not meet our needs.
• IBA Industrial (2017-2018)
– Hosted most recent AEC experimental activity with 3 MeV Dynamitron
• JWK/NAVY NCRADA (NSWC Indian Head) (2020- )
– “Advanced Energy and Propulsion Research and Development”
ALSO
What do you think of the recent BOLD market entry claims made by Global Energy Corporation GEC?
The Global Energy Corporation (GEC) Larry Forsley CTO
https://drive.google.com/file/…anKzF-8jCflYBiRLpE-y/view
(LENR) "trickle charger" gives the car a "10,000 mile range" without fueling or charging. Patented nanogenerator simply "attaches to battery pack of existing EVs... "
ALSO
Jed Rothwell, David Grimshaw and LENRgy helped review Stan's book before it was made available to the public. Written many years ago, it's fresh off the 'press' and a must read. (at LENR-CANR) It documents some of the early works by these groups.
The Global Energy Corporation (GEC) Larry Forsley CTO
https://drive.google.com/file/…anKzF-8jCflYBiRLpE-y/view
(LENR) "trickle charger" gives the car a "10,000 mile range" without fueling or charging. Patented nanogenerator simply "attaches to battery pack of existing EVs... "
Lattice Confinement Fusion, LENR, Cold Fusion: A Rose by any other name is still a Rose
Published on August 15, 2020 https://www.linkedin.com/pulse…ose-any-other-name-goble/
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.