LENR is occurring in SAFIRE

Quote from Max Nozin

Wyttenbach and the next step after that should be explaining what magnetism actually is, beyond calling it a 'force'.

That's a good argument: We know everything about magnetism in 3D,t, but there is just one PHD thesis for S³! (4D) But we need S⁵ , (SO(4)) too. Currently I work in highly symmetric projective spaces where it works fine too, but only for problems with a small perturbation.

The strong nuclear force equation for the proton works because we can show that based on the Biot Savard law the magnetic and electric force for the relativistic flux are interchangeable because all flux stays inside the current loop!! The equation shows the exact strong force behavior we see in experiments!

Its is much easier to give a proof that QM/QED for dense matter is absolute nonsense, than to work on the complicated 6D SO(4) dynamic Maxwell equations...

Quote from Max Nozin

do you have your favorite perhaps speculative explanation to why two 'opposite' magnet poles are attracted and and two 'same' poles are repelled?

Fact: Biot Savart! Every magnet is equivalent to a ring current!

Quote from axil

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction

Axils Nonsensipedia once more: Nobody ever measured a strong force. But B. Schaeffer measured that the strong interaction is in fact magnetism:

http://bernardschaeffer.canalblog.com

https://www.researchgate.net/s…4624883_Bernard_Schaeffer

Quote from Wyttenbach

But B. Schaeffer measured that the strong interaction is in fact magnetism:

The mysterious strong force is a bastion of the Standard Model.

Bernard Schaeffer's magnetic force is actively suppressed heresy in Western Europe

http://bernardschaeffer.canalblog.com

refused by rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org

not published in French because of the refusal of the French Academy of Sciences

also rejected by

Nuclear Physics A:

..European Physical Journal A

..European Physical Journal P

..Few-Body Systems Review

..Physics Letters B

..Physical Review C

Zakopane Conference on Nuclear Physics

..Europhysics Letters
..

" Your theory is on the level of knowledge of hundred years ago."

"It is absolutely wrong and has nothing to do with the current level of nuclear science."

"We would like to advise you to study one of the textbooks on nuclear physics. "

Accepted

"World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,2016

WJNSP has a more varied editorial board.

Quote from RobertBryant

also rejected by

Nuclear Physics A:

..European Physical Journal A

..European Physical Journal P

..Few-Body Systems Review

..Physics Letters B

..Physical Review C

Zakopane Conference on Nuclear Physics

..Europhysics Letters

Display More

Physics today is a religious circle: To much nonsense has been invented to many prizes have been devoted to fake claims like quarks being particles, or the fake Higgs particles (one mass is now under the carpet already..) super gravity. It took them only 90 years to surpass the inventions (e.g. around Mary) of the catholic church...

B. Schaeffer does simple scattering experiments: He correctly paints the results in a graph and where (1..3 fm) the physics church believes a strong force should work there is simply nothing else than magnetic force.

But CERN, ITER and thousand of prof's (QED, String theory, super gravity...) on world wide top universities need food (money) to continues their easy live.

But their live is now on stake. We can first time give proof that most things they (physics church) claim is nonsense.

Quote from Curbina

As the anisotropy of the emission has a slight relationship with the Earth’s magnetic field I wonder if this could be more related to the magnetic nature of the forces than the assumed distortion of space time that these researcher propose as the source of the anisotropy.

I made one trial only with magnetic modeling of neutrons and neutron spectra. It seems to work fine. I just do not have the time to do all the work that is interesting. All neutron interaction is purely magnetic. But the free neutron structure is pretty complex and all interaction is given by the orbits and their masses and coupling strength(s). Such a detailed work will be a deep dive!

So how much of Quantum Mechanics the Standard Model, QED and QCD can be thrown out? Schaeffer's interpretation of magnetic forces holding nucleons together seems far more sensible than inventing an unknown 'strong force' to do the job. So the academic cabal is treating him a bit like the way they have treated Holmlid since they have to protect their academic investment at all costs - just think what real advances in nuclear physics could have been made without their ramshackle theories - do they all have to pass away before any real understanding of controlled mass to energy conversion (via LENR or any other method) can be achieved?

Quote from RobertBryant

The mysterious strong force is a bastion of the Standard Model.

Bernard Schaeffer's magnetic force is actively suppressed heresy in Western Europe

http://bernardschaeffer.canalblog.com

refused by rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org

not published in French because of the refusal of the French Academy of Sciences

also rejected by

Nuclear Physics A:

..European Physical Journal A

..European Physical Journal P

..Few-Body Systems Review

..Physics Letters B

..Physical Review C

Zakopane Conference on Nuclear Physics

..Europhysics Letters
..

" Your theory is on the level of knowledge of hundred years ago."

"It is absolutely wrong and has nothing to do with the current level of nuclear science."

"We would like to advise you to study one of the textbooks on nuclear physics. "

Accepted

"World Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology,2016

WJNSP has a more varied editorial board.

Display More

WJNST is not a well known science journal.

https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php (which lists 31971 journals)

Nuclear Physics A - no 14 out of 102 in nuclear physics subject area list: H = 150

Europhysics Letters H = 144

WJNSP not on list

Looking at the comments from reviewers, could "more varied" be a synonym for "lower standards"?

THH

As Wyttenbach has said at ICCF22;

The first step in a Hydrogen fusion reaction is the forming of e.g. H*-H*/D*-D* pairs (Hydrino,dense Hydrogen ..) as shown by Mills/Holmlid. This process can be explained by the weak force equivalent constant 1FC that forces the two joining perturbative proton masses on one more rotation orbit. The charge corrected calculated net potential of 495.8eV is in perfect agreement with 496eV measured by R.Mills in the H*-H* case.

So Mills' hydrinos are equivalent to Holmlid's (ultra) dense hydrogen state - so both release mesons spontaneously (triggered by background radiation and/or chiral anomalies) which is rapidly increased by infra-red radiation delivered either by 1064 laser, electrical discharge or by an internal heating element. While its completely unknown how quark-antiquark mesons are formed from p-p p-n or n-n interactions, some scattering evidence suggests that pions are involved in magnetic binding together of nucleons using quark-antiquark pairs in the form of pions as exchange particles between nucleons. So this could be the basis of why kaons and subsequent pions are ejected in this nuclear form from proton collisions or closely apposed nuclei (2.3 pm) either in UDH or hydrinos. Subsequent decay to negative muons would certainly act to catalyse further p-p fusion reactions liberating 400 keV (Mills), 3 kW (JR & Mizuno) and an unspecified excess heat (Holmlid).

So that makes three outstanding, living on the edge, scientists who each contest the established view of QM. Holmlid, Mills & Schaeffer - pity they don't try working together. Hopefully Wyttenbach will make some sense of it all in a predictive way.

Quote from Dr Richard

So that makes three outstanding, living on the edge, scientists ... Holmlid, Mills & Schaeffer

Beg to disagree.

Mills is not a scientist

Schaefer has done some material science far from theoretical physics - not sure to what standard

Holmlid is an interesting, maverick, but not obviously outstanding, scientist.

(Schaeffer from his blog)

At first I was a stone breaker when I put a few on the railroad tracks to see what it would look like. The risk was still minimal and indeed there was only a small cloud of dust. Ten years later, after my first baccalaureate, my father sent me to do an internship at Pont-à-Mousson where I broke ductile iron pipes with a sheep.

My thesis focused on the deformation and breaking of salt crystals from my manufacturing and lithium fluoride irradiated with gamma rays. By irradiation with gamma rays they were colored, in blue the crystals of NaCl and in orange those of LiF. It was first necessary to build a guillotine to cleave the crystals. Their plastic deformation revealed electric charges and luminescence accompanied by a change in color. I showed this phenomenon to the Russians of the Crystallography Institute where Pasternak worked (his father wrote Dr. Jivago). I spent three months of winter in the USSR, a stay organized under the aegis of the Curien brothers, intended to visit laboratories in the framework of Franco-Soviet exchanges, a little in the same style as my uncle, Minister of Health of Chile in the 50s. I gave a talk in German in Kharkov, translated into Ukrainian by the professor who welcomed me. I would have liked to visit a laboratory in Siberia. I met people from this laboratory in Moscow (I was told that it was as if I had been to Tomsk).

On my return I resumed my thesis, completed during my military service at Orsay as a scientist of the contingent. I took advantage of the new computer UNIVAC thanks to a friend who taught me the use. I calculated the constraints of a stack of dislocations in a LiF crystal that I measured by photoelasticity. For that I solved numerically by finite differences the biharmonic equation. A mathematician would have first looked for convergence criteria but I just tried and it worked. It was quite odd, however, because the calculation began by diverging. In any case I obtained a distribution of constraints quite identical to that measured by photoelasticimetry. This calculation is obviously in my thesis but I

Guinier offered to do a post-doc at Syracuse University in the United States, which I gladly accepted. I had two researches to do, one on the plastic deformation around an artificial crack in an aluminum plate using the method of moirés which I multiplied the sensitivity by 10, which makes visible elastic deformations. Only a Chinese has been able to repeat my experience. The second topic was doing something similar in a so-called unbreakable transparent plastic, bisphenol polycarbonate or Lexan. In fact, notched, it breaks like glass.

When I returned, I spent a year in Mulhouse where I broke pipes again, this time in composite material. Then I went to work at the Technical Center of Tiles and Bricks, in Clamart where I broke bricks, the largest of which was two meters high. I showed how to take moisture expansion into account in the brick standard by applying the laws of water diffusion in clay microcrystals.

I then went to the SNPE where I did where I studied the polymerization of composite propellants over a sufficiently long period (6 months) and an extended temperature range showing that the polymerization could be done even at low temperature. It was a perfect fit because propellant charges for the strike force had been poorly cooked and, according to my measurements, it was enough to wait for the polymerization to take place. This allowed to recover five loads of thrusters on the ten having this defect. I never knew if they had been shot. In any case the force of ground strikes has been suppressed. Then I was asked to create a laboratory of mechanical properties of powders for weapons and explosives. I had a machine built rapid mechanical tests by a Swiss firm because the Americans did not want to sell us theirs with the same performance (20 m / s). The CEA hastened to acquire it. I also introduced microinformatics. The head of the computer center, not believing that the Apple II was able to draw a line had to go check it at the show of microinformatics. I knew it because I had bought one. I also knew we could fly a traction machine because I had it with a toy, an electric car. So I had an interface made by the electronic service. So we had a computer-controlled traction machine that delivered the test PV on a word processor, including the traction curve. It was planned to do high speed tests on these active materials. In traction, there is no risk. In compression, it is more delicate, so it was necessary to make a safety test on the gunpowder: it detonated, which, apparently, was never observed. I am sure that, under the same conditions, ammonium nitrate would have detonated in the same way as it happened in Toulouse during the AZF accident.

My success was jealous, I found myself in the documentation, which allowed me to learn, sometimes unrelated to my work, and microinformatique management. I replaced at short notice, the management controller, ill for the computer part: my boss was surprised how I got out.

Finally, I was told that I was too old to do research, except that of a job. I was only a few years old until retirement. That did not bother me because I had my scientific activity in parallel which was to develop a software of numerical simulation whose basic idea was that of the finite differences that I had already implemented with the school of Orsay . So I started by simulating a surf that I developed for solids but nobody was interested so I stopped when Apple abandoned the software I used.

I began to work on more fundamental topics, such as relativity and quantum mechanics, which are much more exciting. I published a book "Relativités et quanta clarifiés". Now I have attacked nuclear physics. I managed to explain why nuclear energy is nearly a million times more concentrated than chemical energy. All the books of nuclear physics say that it is impossible because the electromagnetic interaction would be too weak, but nobody tried to make the calculation since 1924, time one did not know the magnetic moments of the neutron and the proton . The Academy of Sciences and other journals have refused to publish my theory because I break the barrage of nuclear ...