nul-points, since you ask, I'll quote the points H-G made that I think are interesting, if you'd like to address them (or perhaps not):
"several pictures of microscopic tracks on various surfaces have been shown in some threads on this forum. For lack of other explanation they have been ascribed to 'strange radiation'. ... Certainly a single Strange Radiation Particle cannot generate tracks like these. It would take a beam of such particles. This beam must be deflected and perhaps also modulated to create the repetitive patterns that distinguish those tracks."
"Finely focused particle beams do not materialize spontaneously, they have to be engineered using a particle already known to science."
Is there anything there you agree with? Is there anything you disagree with? These are statements H-G made, and they can be considered and addressed on their merits.