IH did exactly what I and others wanted them to do, and that was to vet the Ecat. The way they accomplished that was ugly, expensive, and amateurish, but in the end they got it done. Thanks to them we knew for sure the Ecat did not work, and that Rossi was as dishonest as the day is long.
Now NASA is in a similar position to vet the Genie Reactor. They will do a thorough job of it, and in the end we will know if it works.
But at the *beginning* of the IH association, people used the association to give Rossi credibility, just as you did with NASA in the earlier post:
“Now they are working with NASA, and I would think they of all would have a good idea of the integrity of the GEC team they partnered with. … An out and out scammer like Rossi would have been noticed long ago.”
Notice the present tense. Nothing there about “will do a thorough job”. After IH had been with Rossi for 6 months people were saying an out and out scammer would have been noticed long ago. But it took a few more years, at least to convince the likes of you.
So, anyway, we now seem to agree that confidence in GEC should be postponed until evidence is available.
“And yes, I did learn something from Rossi, and no doubt you will keep reminding me of it.”
What are friends for?