Quark Fusion and LENR

  • Observations from a MFMP video of processes that have occurred inside the diamonds that comprise the LION reactor fuel suggests that magnetic flux tubes dissolve both protons and neutrons, absorb their energy content, and store their valance quarks until the flux tubes dissipate.


    The chiral magnetic flux tube will hold onto these quarks while the chiral magnetic flux tube survives. When this tube ceases to exist, the quarks recombine into protons, neutrons, and mesons just like a quark gluon plasma will reform back into matter when that quark soup cools.


    As the flux tube terminates, the quarks held in suspension by the flux tube recombine and reform protons and neutrons which then aggregate again into atoms. These atoms show transmutations into both differing isotope and completely new elements that are totally different from the original material feedstock.


    This same matter disassociation mechanism may also be occurring in the Corona of the Sun. When solar flux tubes disaggregate through magnetic reconnection, a quark fusion process transmits the sequestered quarks back into He3, iron, titanium, nickel, oxygen, silicon, magnesium, calcium, aluminum among other elements. These transmuted elements are propelled into space and subsequently deposited by the solar wind into the lunar soil.


    Composition_of_lunar_soil.svg?


    In more detail, Mass Coronal ejections seed He3 and iron into the interstellar medium.

    Besides He3, the solar wind contains iron and these nano-iron particles make lunar soil magnetic.


    https://science.nasa.gov/scien…06/04apr_magneticmoondust


    Iron is produced by coronal mass ejections


    https://www.everythingselectric.com/eie-4/


    http://www.mps.mpg.de/Magnetic…rate-particles-on-the-Sun


    Quote

    “Sudden particle emissions, in which our star repeatedly hurls large amounts of charged and uncharged particles into space, are still a mystery. Some of these particle flows are accompanied by violent solar flares, a sudden and local increase of the Sun’s brightness, and contain up to 10,000 times more helium-3 and up to 10 times more iron than the Sun's atmosphere. Why is this extremely rare helium isotope accelerated into space so efficiently? And why iron? How does the Sun supply these particles with the necessary energy to catapult them into space?”

    Logic forces us to accept the reality that element transmutation is occurring within the solar flux tubes since the elements expelled from them are so much more abundant than the solar ambient.


    Furthermore, as Holmlid has pointed out, fusion does not produce enough energy to accelerate these particles to the ultra-high speeds needed to reach the escape velocity of the Sun. There needs to be an energy accumulation mechanism to amplify and concentrate solar energy. It takes hundreds of millions of electrons volts for the Sun to eject matter into the solar wind. That energy comes from the binding energy derived from the dissolution of protons and neutrons that have been stored in the solar magnetic flux tubes which also support the transmutation of iron and He3 among many other elements generated by quark fusion.

  • https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Stars/Sun/Neutrinos


    Stars/Sun/Neutrinos


    There is a direct correlation between the Coronal mass ejection intently and solar neutrino production. This connection indicates that there are nuclear processes occurring within the magnetic flux tubes.


    Quote

    Main sources: Stars/Chromospheres and Chromospheres


    "The correlation between a great solar flare and Homestake neutrino enhancement was tested in 1991. Six major flares occurred from May 25 to June 15 including the great June 4 flare associated with a coronal mass ejection and production of the strongest interplanetary shock wave ever recorded (later detected from spacecraft at 34, 35, 48, and 53 AU) [15]. It also caused the largest and most persistent (several months) signal ever detected by terrestrial cosmic ray neutron monitors in 30 years of operation [16]. The Homestake exposure (June 1–7) measured a mean 37Ar production rate of 3.2 ± 1.5 atoms/day (≈19 37Ar atoms produced in 6 days) [13]; about 5 times the rate of ≈ 0.65 day −1 for the preceding and following runs, > 6 times the long term mean of ≈ 0.5 day−1 and > 2 1/2 times the highest rates recorded in ∼ 25 operating years."


  • External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Solar Flare Produces Coronal Rain 2012-07-19 NASA Goddard Solar Dynamics Observatory

    In the first part of the video, the plasma is very bright in the visible temperature range. But as time passes, the plasma heats and becomes invisible.


    In the latter part of the video, notice how plasma seems to appear at the top of the line of magnetic flux tubes. If there is a plasma circulation pattern in place, the upward leg of that circulation is now invisible in visible temperture range. Hot plasma is not usually invisible, as demonstrated by the downward lag of the circulation. That downward rain of matter seems to appear out of no where. This is due to the cooling of the plasma over time as its energy is radiated away.


    Invisible plasma in visible light is iron at a temperature of about 1,000,000C as XUV of black body radiation. As the plasma cools, its temperature drops to 7,000C and glowing with intense visible black body light.


    A quack fusion based reaction must be producing the energy necessary to elevate the plasma temperature of the highly ionized iron to over 1,000,000C. No conventional fusion reaction that I am aware of can transform hydogen directly into iron at the low fusion(hot) temperatures in place within this plasma circulation..

  • https://phys.org/news/2013-04-…-flux-rope-formation.html


    Scientists 'see' flux rope formation for the first time


    Quote

    At the time of the July 18 eruption, NASA's SDO cameras had the perfect angle to look directly down the center of the flux rope, giving scientists a view of what looked exactly like the slinky drawn by theorists for decades. In addition, the AIA cameras captured imagery like no other cameras are able to do with light at the 131 Angstrom wavelength. This view shows the solar material heated to temperatures of 10,000,000 degrees. Surprisingly, the flux rope was invisible in images at other wavelengths, used regularly for Space Weather analysis. Those wavelengths correspond to cooler (below 2 million degrees) temperatures, however.


    What could be heating solar material to 10,000,000 degrees inside the magnetic flux rope?




    Figure (b) is the correct structure for a magnetic flux rope.

  • For sure not Low Energy Nuclear Reactions... the world and the experimenters here would have recognized such energy bursts if they would have happened in their labs. Only Rossi comes close with his temperature of 11.000 degrees or even much higher ... :)

  • For sure not Low Energy Nuclear Reactions... the world and the experimenters here would have recognized such energy bursts if they would have happened in their labs. Only Rossi comes close with his temperature of 11.000 degrees or even much higher ... :)


    The SAFIRE project is seeing this sort of thing. SAFIRE does produce He3 together with power productions in bursts up to 20,000,000 watts.

  • Asthe flux tube terminates, the quarks held in suspension by the flux tuberecombine and reform protons and neutrons which then aggregate again into atoms.These atoms show transmutations into both differing isotope and completely new elementsthat are totally different from the original material feedstock.

    ....

    Please correct me, If I missed the point, where suddenly the topic changed.
    1) We are on a forum which deals with LENR
    2) We are talking about LOW energy nuclear reactions.
    3) You mention the corona of many thousands of degrees ???
    4) You mention subatomic particle physics (e.g. quarks )in correlation to LOW energy nuclear reactions ?

    Conclusions: Are You simply blating us and flooding the entire board ? If so, what Is the reason for this and which purpose does it feed ?



  • There is a common thread that runs through these seemingly unconnected items. That common LENR causation mechanism is rotating magnetic flux tubes produced by a variety of chiral magnetic vortexes.


    1 - all the posts directly cover the LENR process.


    2 - each of these seeming disparate processes are directly and intimately connected.


    3 - the LENR reaction can occur in a variety of situations from inside bacteria to the most energetic regions on the surface of the Sun.


    4 - The LENR reaction is produced by chiral magnetic flux tubes which disrupt the confinement of quarks in protons and neutrons, How these flux tubes are created and subsequently operate is the common thread that connect the posts within this thread.




  • 1) This is unlikely, because LENR is literally LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR reactions. It is totally impossible, that these kinds of LOW ENERGY ( assuming low pressure, low temperature, slow particle motion ) allow any effects on the subatomic structure of particles, e.g. quarks

    2) No, and this is Your problem. Physicy is not a cocktail / salad bar

    3) I cannot imagine any reference to a viable ressource, which can state, that LENR can occurr in bacteria, however, the surface of the sun would contradict the phrase LENR at all.

    4) There is not the slightest reference to a viable source, which states this or EVEN assumes this.

  • A very prominent Russian scientist Vladimir Vyssotsky has been studying LENR in algae and bacterial for many years, in recent times concentrating on the denaturing of Cs137. It's interesting stuff.

    ... You mean, LENR occurring in lifeforms ? This must be VERY LOW energy reactions, but is this guy reliable ?

  • 1) This is unlikely, because LENR is literally LOW ENERGY NUCLEAR reactions. It is totally impossible, that these kinds of LOW ENERGY ( assuming low pressure, low temperature, slow particle motion ) allow any effects on the subatomic structure of particles, e.g. quarks


    LENR is based on the coupling of the nuclear magnetic moments. In that sense Axils argument is not wrong. But chirality has no influence. This is just one degree of freedom for a magnetic flux.

    The other problem of Axil is the creative referencing of the standard model. Today we know that the standard model is wrong and Quarks are just known as a structures and not as particles. The true physical dense space is SO(4) more or less "double" of what was assumed in the STM, what explains most errors that have been made.


    These statements are based on theoretical modelling and not on believe or wish...

  • LENR is based on the coupling of the nuclear magnetic moments. In that sense Axils argument is not wrong. But chirality has no influence. This is just one degree of freedom for a magnetic flux.

    The other problem of Axil is the creative referencing of the standard model. Today we know that the standard model is wrong and Quarks are just known as a structures and not as particles. The true physical dense space is SO(4) more or less "double" of what was assumed in the STM, what explains most errors that have been made.


    These statements are based on theoretical modelling and not on believe or wish...

    Dear Jurg,

    could you share your feeling about last news from Parkhomov's team in relation with XH both with titanium, deutérium and MOSTLY Landau damping ?

    David FOJT

  • Quote

    Today we know that the standard model is wrong and Quarks are just known as a structures and not as particles



    ... I assume, You barely speak for any reliable physicist by mentioning this sentence.....

  • ... I assume, You barely speak for any reliable physicist by mentioning this sentence.....


    @lobseRvable : Can you tell us a first class physicists that could calculate a quark mass from first principle?? With at least 4 digits precision...


    Fact: The STM is a collective illusion.


    The precision of the new model is within the measurement(s) and already was able to predict new phenomena! But unluckily this theory is not from a so called first class physicist... But Randall Mills did also never study physics... May be this is the key prerequisite to avoid the pitfalls of conformism.

    • Official Post

    Alan Smith add Kornilova to the list. They have been working together for decades. That invloves collaboration with Proton-21 lab and Adamenko.

    In her recent interview she claims they finally made a breakthrough advances in understanding and reporoducing the mechanism empoyed by bacteria.

    While 1h long interview didn't contain much drtalis and was riddled with partiotic proclamations, I still think there is a value in the discovery of thermal waves. She admits that thermal name is a bit confusing. Maybe that is why therir paper hasn't been met with much attention.

    She says that these waves are the way excess heat can dissipate without being noticed.

    They subjected small deuterated titanium sample to waves meter away from the source of cavitataton and within 5 minutes diffractive properties of the sample changed. That change has been confirmed by the group of researchers who specialized solely in analysis of material properties.

    She also mentions that Haggelstein was able to see similar results but disagree on the mechanism.

    The biggest probelm they have is that they are true scientist which means they can happyly sit on an incremental result producing papers and PhDs without much of practical applications for decades.

  • As long as any attempts to replicate reliable results (e.g. Fleischmann/Pons) fail or any explanation for an not well understood effect, which is NOT artifacts, I stick to the STM. Mills paper was peer reviewed exposing a lot of nonsense and wrong calculations, IIRC.
    So basically, non studied people trying to dig into topics like quantum mechanics are more likely to troll than those people, who studied.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.