Quote from JeanM

Hi all. I propose there a scheme in a way to justify the existence of biological transmutations, and I show how it could work :

ResearchGate - About the existence of nuclear reactions in biological systems

You might want to consider the role of spin chirality and the establishment of a Bose Condensate among the members of a bacterial colony.

All life is left handed chiral. Neutrinos are all left handed chiral particles. The weak force only works on left handed chiral particles, The microbes that are all members of a Bose condensate can share energy among their colony, in effect, acting as one large organism in terms of energy utilization. A Bose condensate can release nuclear energy through particle creation. And since the microbes are all left handed chiral, they will be protected from radioactive isotope production.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com…r-right-handed-180959956/

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.g…/Particles/neutrino3.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superradiance

https://www.nature.com/articles/524008b

https://www.quantumdiaries.org…ality-mass-and-the-higgs/

Quote from axil

The microbes that are all members of a Bose condensate can share energy among their colony,

axil : Can you stop such utmost nonsense writing? Do you really know about what you talk?? Physics is not Harry Potter like...

Quote from Wyttenbach

axil : Can you stop such utmost nonsense writing? Do you really know about what you talk?? Physics is not Harry Potter like...

Every sentence that I wrote was backed up with a reference. Your prejudice show you to be a scientific dinosaur You need to update your skill set.

Quote from Alan Smith

As you say, you posted many links. But none of them appear to claim that left chirality confers protection from radio-isotopes. Since there are no right-chiral organisms, you would have a very hard job proving this hypothesis anyway. Neutrinos AFAIK do'nt interact readily with matter, so have little to do with this anyway.

Thank you for this opportunity to ask you to perform an experiment. You have all the equipment to do this experiment well.

Place a small cylinder or ring rare earth magnet in a high speed rotating device such as a 35,000 rpm dremel tool so that the magnet rotates axially. Position the vortex flux tube created by the rotation on a radioactive source and see if the rate of decay changes. A motor will do if no high speed rotational tool is at hand.

If it does change, see what affect that changing the speed of rotation has on the radioactive source's decay rate.

A cylinder or ring rare earth magnet will produce a magnetic axial vortex. So first visualize that vortex using smoke in calm air of micro water bubbles in water.

Do not rotate the magnet counter to that natural vortex motion. Expose the magnetic pole when mounting the magnet in the tool or motor so that the tools rotation will increase that vortex rotational speed when rotation is applied. Expose the magnetic pole on the tool that will drive a left handed rotation of the magnetic flux tube.

The purpose of the experiment is to verify that a rotating chiral magnetic flux tube will affect the weak force.

You might apply this vortex tube to the radiation coming from your Russ experiment if no radioactive calibration source is at hand, but you have said that you have those sources.

Quote from Alan Smith

As you say, you posted many links. But none of them appear to claim that left chirality confers protection from radio-isotopes. Since there are no right-chiral organisms, you would have a very hard job proving this hypothesis. Neutrinos AFAIK do'nt interact readily with matter, so have little to do with this anyway.

Particle chirality has some complications that result from special relativity. A particles helicity will change if it has mass and is viewed from a frame that modifies its direction of travel.

Quote from Alan Smith

axil. Faraday proved (sometime before even I was born) that you can rotate a magnet all you like but the field doesn't rotate with it. It's called 'Faraday's Paradox'.

Quote

The chirality of a particle is more abstract: It is determined by whether the particle transforms in a right- or left-handed representation of the Poincaré group.

For massless particles – photons, gluons, and (hypothetical) gravitons – chirality is the same as helicity; a given massless particle appears to spin in the same direction along its axis of motion regardless of point of view of the observer.

For massive particles – such as electrons, quarks, and neutrinos – chirality and helicity must be distinguished: In the case of these particles, it is possible for an observer to change to a reference frame moving faster than the spinning particle, in which case the particle will then appear to move backwards, and its helicity (which may be thought of as “apparent chirality”) will be reversed.

A massless particle moves with the speed of light, so no real observer (who must always travel at less than the speed of light) can be in any reference frame where the particle appears to reverse its relative direction of spin, meaning that all real observers see the same helicity. Because of this, the direction of spin of massless particles is not affected by a change of viewpoint (Lorentz boost) in the direction of motion of the particle, and the sign of the projection (helicity) is fixed for all reference frames: The helicity of massless particles is a “relativistic invariant” (a quantity whose value is the same in all inertial reference frames) which always matches the massless particles' chirality.

The discovery of neutrino oscillation implies that neutrinos have mass, so the only observed massless particle is the photon. The gluon is also expected to be massless, although the assumption that it is has not been conclusively tested. Hence, these are the only two particles now known for which helicity could be identical to chirality, and only one of them has been confirmed by measurement. All other observed particles have mass and thus may have different helicities in different reference frames. It is still possible that as-yet unobserved particles, like the graviton, might be massless, and hence have invariant helicity that matches their chirality, like the photon

Display More

Because of this relativistic complication. the people who beleive that particle vortexes (plasmoids) produce LENR are incorrect. Only magnetic vortexes generate the LENR reaction because the frame of reference of a photon is invariant under frame translation.

A rotating magnetic field is demonstrated..

Quote from Alan Smith

Helicity and Chirality are not the same thing - except for massless particles. Also you are evading proving that any of this has anything to do with radiological protection.

Proving that a rotating magnetic field (however it is generated) is the purpose of the experiment that I have requested.

Rapid rotation of a metal produces the LENR reaction

https://translate.google.com/t…231%2F004a%2F02311041.htm

1. Analysis of microscopic traces of MHER(aka strange radiation) from bodies of revolution.

Experiments with bodies of revolution were carried out on a special installation. The installation consisted of a collectorless high-speed motor (up to 50,000 revolutions per minute) mounted on the table top, engine power supply unit and remote control engine. On the axis of the engine were mounted bodies of rotation of various materials, made in the form of cones with a diameter of 20 mm and a height of 20 mm (photo 4).

To ensure the safety of work around the engines with the bodies of rotation, a protective casing is mounted, inside which, along the wall of the casing (perpendicular to the bases of the cones) and above it (perpendicular to the axis of rotation), photodetectors packed in opaque bags were placed.

A series of experiments was carried out for the exposure of photodetectors with the following rotation bodies: graphite, aluminum, titanium, copper, bismuth, zirconium, iron, cadmium, lead. At the same time, light materials (graphite, aluminum, titanium) rotated at speeds of about 40,000 rpm, heavy ones - at least 15,000 rpm.

Exposure time for all bodies of rotation was 360 +/- 20 seconds. Temperature at measurement: 25 0 С +/- 5 0 С. Comparative analysis was performed by comparing microdamages at different areas of photodetectors:

- in the plane of the base of the rotating cones (about 35 mm from the bottom of the photodetector);

- at different heights from the plane of the base of the cones;

- on the upper photodetector located perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the cones.

Spiral traces.

On all photodetectors located perpendicular to the base of cones of bodies of rotation, there are macroobjects in the form of rings, semirings and spirals (hyperbolic and logarithmic spirals), which are located on the entire surface of the negatives. The greatest concentration of objects is observed in the central (vertically) parts of the negatives - about 2.5 - 7.5 cm from the bottom. On photodetectors located perpendicular to the axis of rotation, there were no special differences from the control samples. In Fig. 5, for example, the spirals selected by the operator, recorded by a photo detector near the body of rotation from the iron, are shown.

Spiral-shaped objects on the photodetector, exposed near the body of rotation of iron (about 7 cm from the bottom, an increase of 64x)

A clear pattern of the distribution of spiraling objects, applicable to all bodies of rotation, was not revealed, because the distribution of objects over the surface of negatives is not uniform, and on films with a low emulsion concentration (light films), it is practically impossible to consider objects (for example, films with a copper rotation body - Cu).

To make the quantitative analysis of spiral traces it was not possible for the following reasons:

high labor intensity and subjective dependence of the identification of spiraling traces on the quality of training and health of the operator;

the nature and mechanisms of the appearance of spiral trails are unknown, so we can not yet determine the parameters by which the analysis should be performed;

the quality of photographs strongly depends on the quality of the developer, the film and the modes of manifestation, and therefore varies from batch to batch.

Table 1 describes the qualitative characteristics of the detected objects on photodetectors located near different rotation bodies:

See the reference for more

The SmCo7 magnet is lenr active based on the Craven;s Golden Ball experiment were SmCo7 magnetic dust supplies the magntic flux lines. Sm is a chiral catalyst used in drug production chemistry to convert the drug molecule to left handed active. So the photons that are produced by the SmCo7 magnet must be left handed photons. The other rare earth magnets might also be formed from a rare earth chiral catalyst.

In both cases in which I beleive that LENR is activated: the Petal condensate and the solar flux rope, these cases produce magnetic rotation. So magnetic flux line rotation could be required to meet the quark magnetic interface confinement field which is also a rotating magnetic flux tube. Quark confinement disruption might occur through magnetic flux tube re-connection if the disparate flux tube characterizations of the LENR active agent and quark confinement are close enough to approximately match.

If photons can disrupt quark confinement then the concept of gluons might well be consigned to the trash heap.

The weak force only acts upon left handed particles.

Quote

Chiral theories

Only left-handed fermions and right-handed antifermions interact with the weak interaction. In most circumstances, two left-handed fermions interact more strongly than right-handed or opposite-handed fermions, implying that the universe has a preference for left-handed chirality, which violates a symmetry of the other forces of nature.

Chirality for a Dirac fermion ψ is defined through the operator γ⁵, which has eigenvalues±1. Any Dirac field can thus be projected into its left- or right-handed component by acting with the projection operators ½(1−γ⁵) or ½(1+γ⁵) on ψ.

The coupling of the charged weak interaction to fermions is proportional to the first projection operator, which is responsible for this interaction's parity symmetry violation.

A common source of confusion is due to conflating this operator with the helicity operator. Since the helicity of massive particles is frame-dependent, it might seem that the same particle would interact with the weak force according to one frame of reference, but not another. The resolution to this false paradox is that the chirality operator is equivalent to helicity for massless fields only, for which helicity is not frame-dependent. By contrast, for massive particles, chirality is not the same as helicity, so there is no frame dependence of the weak interaction: a particle that couples the weak force in one frame, does so in every frame.

A theory that is asymmetric with respect to chiralities is called a chiral theory, while a non-chiral (i.e., parity-symmetric) theory is sometimes called a vector theory. Many pieces of the Standard Model of physics are non-chiral, which is traceable to anomaly cancellation in chiral theories. Quantum chromodynamics is an example of a vector theory, since both chiralities of all quarks appear in the theory, and couple to gluons in the same way.

The electroweak theory, developed in the mid 20th century, is an example of a chiral theory. Originally, it assumed that neutrinos were massless, and only assumed the existence of left-handed neutrinos (along with their complementary right-handed antineutrinos). After the observation of neutrino oscillations, which imply that neutrinos are massive like all other fermions, the revised theories of the electroweak interaction now include both right- and left-handed neutrinos. However, it is still a chiral theory, as it does not respect parity symmetry.

The exact nature of the neutrino is still unsettled and so the electroweak theories that have been proposed are somewhat different, but most accommodate the chirality of neutrinos in the same way as was already done for all other fermions.

Display More

I point out that solar neutrno flux has been observed to modifiy the decay rates of radioactive isotopes, so the neutrino may still be chiral active.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.3754

The Case for a Solar Influence on Certain Nuclear Decay Rates

Quote from axil

Particle chirality has some complications that result from special relativity.

Special and general relativity break down in dense matter as already Mills did prove.

Quote from axil

Only magnetic vortexes generate the LENR reaction because the frame of reference of a photon is invariant under frame translation.

The first part is true as we now know that most particle mass is EM-mass and the EM mass is "proportional" to the involved magnetic moments. The second part is again wrong reasoning as there is no time parameter on curved photon orbits = magnetic flux = standing wave = rotating mass.

In dense space there is only a relation between speed of light and the wave number given by the possible/allowed wavelengths.

The fact is: Magnetic flux is always traveling at light speed. Thus is never subject to classic relativity in the dimensions it flows.

Quote from axil

If photons can disrupt quark confinement then the concept of gluons might well be consigned to the trash heap.

One more step towards the truth: Most "particles" of the so called standard model are just superposition of allowed photon energies. Unluckily this cannot be seen if you use standard model physics...

Quarks are not particles: they (u,d) are formed by the proton 4D base waves.