Russia and Eastern European LENR Developments

Quote from Alan Smith

Here's a different look at some tracks...

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/c…CCF11/pres/81-Ivoilov.pdf

In the first time the term 'strange' radiation was used in paper of
L. Uroutzkoev with co-workes, where in electro-explosive experiments
realized on metal wires fixed in a liquid the high-energy radiation has
been detected on nuclei photographic plates, located out of explosion
camera [1]. In sediment formed in the liquid the essential amount of
new chemical elements (up to 1019 new atoms) are detected. In the
paper it has been established experimentally that the radiation detected
is electrically neutral but interacts with magnetic field. The authors of
this paper put forward a prudent supposition that in the condition of
electro-explosion magnetic monopoles can be born or generated. Later
with the usage of the conversion Mossbauer spectroscopy it has been
shown experimentally that accumulation effect (with further effect of
relaxation) of this radiation takes place in ferromagnetic films
imbedded in the external magnetic field [2]. In the experiments
realized [1, 2] the source of radiation was electro-explosion of metal
imbedded into liquid. The discharge parameters of the capacitance
battery were the following: the tension 5 kV and the value of the
current 150 kA.

Display More

Paradigmnoia often has dismissed these kind of marks as a scratch from some solid trapped between two rigid plates. The ones seen in emulsions are hard to dismiss this way, as nothing touched those surfaces. Matsumoto found traces in his much thicker nuclear emulsion plates that were of much more complex shapes and also he was able to determine the traces had a 3D component (the advantage of using a thicker nuclear plate), but more importantly, Matsumoto had controls where no marks were found.

CR-39 is I'm afraid vey difficult to handle - only recently somebody sent me a set of photographs of CR-39 plates which has many marks which might easily be taken for particle tracks, but he assured me they were not. I much prefer the use of photographic paper or x-ray film.

Quote from Alan Smith

CR-39 is I'm afraid vey difficult to handle - only recently somebody sent me a set of photographs of CR-39 plates which has many marks which might easily be taken for particle tracks, but he assured me they were not. I much prefer the use of photographic paper or x-ray film.

Yes, I agree CR-39 is a complex material to handle, and it has been very controversial. A few days ago I found a chapter of book that says that the good old nuclear emulsion plates, even if more than a 100 years old, and after a decline in use due to the time consuming analysis of the images, has experienced a full fledged comeback of the hand of automated high resolution optical scanning and analysis.

https://link.springer.com/chap….1007/978-3-030-35318-6_9

Matsumoto, being old school nuclear physicist, used nuclear emulsion plates in most if not all of his published "cold fusion" papers.

Quote from Max Nozin

Interesting experiment from Russia reported by http://lenr.seplm.ru/articles/…-v-neravnovesnykh-sredakh

PDF: https://ikar.udm.ru/files/pdf/sb75-3.pdf

What makes it interesting is than electrolyte is being stimulated contactless. As in Fig.1. So unless one claims diffusion/fallout of Ca via glass or polypropylene , it will be hard to explain absence of Calcium is samples after treatment see Таблица 1 (1 row before, 2nd and 3rd after experiment) Also subject to errors in ICP-AES analysis,

I attempted a human improved google translation, for solving my own curiosity. One can only wonder where did the elements that dissapeared go (Zn was reduced drastically in the solution contained in glass), is a pitty that they did not attempt to find new elements other than the main one present in the original solutions, one can only wonder what happened to the nucleons of the dissapearing elements.

This brief paper is really interesting, this implies that whatever is happening during the electrolysis can go right through the glass and polipropilene and affect the nucleons of the solutes.

Going back to the emulsion marks, this one (taken from https://link.springer.com/chap….1007/978-3-030-35318-6_9

Fig. 9.25: An antiproton annihilation vertex in an emulsion layer [155]. The view is perpendicular to the antiproton beam direction

can be said to be very similar to this one that Takaaki Matsumoto registered in nuclear emulsion during Fleischmann - Pons analog electrolysis experiments (from Takaaki Matsumoto (1992) Observation of Stars Produced during Cold Fusion, Fusion Technology, 22:4, 518-523, DOI: 10.13182/FST92-A30088) "The nuclear emulsions (100 /xm x 25 mm X

25 mm) were located outside an electrolyzing cell and placed in contact with the thin palladium foil (0.10 mm thick). Hydrogen atoms were charged into the palladium metal by electrolyzing heavy water (mixed with 3% NaCl). The temperature showed an insignificant increase, but it was proven by the successful observations of itonic quad-neutrons and tiny black holes that cold fusion certainly occurred.3'5"

Quote from Wyttenbach

Shall this mean that in solution 1 unknown quantities of some elements just disappear ?..

Without giving intial concentration/mol's or g/l this analysis makes no sense at all!

Wyttenbach , the first row has the initial concentrations of the main elements present in the solution, in micrograms per liter. I already mentioned that Ca, Mg, Na and Zn to some extent, seem to simply dissapear, and that's why I say it's a pitty they did not look for new elements that would have been created with the "missing matter".

Experiments done with Omasa's "transmutation vibrating vanes machine" also show dramatic decreases of some elements in the initial solution, but also the appearance of new elements, that if present in the initial solution, are below their detection limit.

Paradigmnoia , we already agreed that those kind of tracks are controversial, that's why I changed the focus to the ones that leave traces in photosensitive / radiosensitive emulsions.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Shall this mean that in solution 1 unknown quantities of some elements just disappear ?..

Without giving intial concentration/mol's or g/l this analysis makes no sense at all!

True. But the paper comes from the company making water purification systems and components for 30 years. I hope they understand how to analyze. However after Joi scientific fiasco everything is possible

would be nice to see samples of water subjected to the same treatment but modified tuning without clusters produced.

Quote from Max Nozin

would be nice to see samples of water subjected to the same treatment but modified tuning without clusters produced.

I really can’t vouch for the quality of a laboratory from this far, but I do know that if proper care is taken in the discarding any dilution, volatilization or precipitation, the measurement of dissolved solids is perhaps the more precise way to find true elemental transmutations. If they had performed a mass balance, it would have been great, but I see no other objection to the data other than “it’s imposible”. And they do report initial and final concentrations, it’s only the implications of it what are hard to digest, if one does not want to accept that Electrolysis does indeed produce “strange radiation”.

Matsumoto found stuff even more impressive, but no one seems to debate his astonishing results. IMHO he is the first one to have reported “strange radiation” he just called “itonic” radiation and he also saw and reported “clustered hydrogen” and took pictures of its deposits.

Quote from Shane D.

Alex Parkomov ICCF23 video narrated by Ekaterina Belousova:

She's his granddaughter.