Rossi has no problem to run experiments in his garage lab that other hightech labs around the globe with the best scientists and billions of dollars of support are incapable of doing...
Rossi is like the good mechanic who can’t afford the high tech shop but will after hours to get your car repaired for morning.
Display MoreHere is a little information about transfer resonant plasma. Basically, if you combine atomic hydrogen with "catalyst" elements that can induce the hydrogen to change into an altered form, energy is released along with electrons that produces a plasma. I have read in BLPs patent literature that a hydrogen-lithium-argon plasma can form at a voltage of around 1 volt.
My guess is that this plasma is how Rossi can pulse the QX/SK using very low voltage and current after an initial higher voltage impulse. Altered forms of hydrogen are formed that then slam themselves into other atoms in the mix (such as lithium). The result are nuclear reactions. I think that the reason the QX could potentially be superior to a BLP plasma Suncell is the lack of a need to supply a constant flow of hydrogen. Since nuclear reactions produce millions of eV instead of hydrino reactions that produce only hundreds of eV, the hydrogen and lithium in a QX could last a very long time.
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/4/1/370
Bright hydrogen-light source due to a resonant energy transfer with strontium and argon ions
Randell L Mills, Mark Nansteel and Paresh C Ray
Abstract
A plasma called a resonant transfer (rt) plasma formed with a low field (1 V cm-1), at low temperatures (e.g. ≈103 K), from atomic hydrogen generated at a tungsten filament and strontium which was vapourized by heating the metal. Strong vacuum ultraviolet emission was observed that increased with the addition of argon, but not when sodium, magnesium or barium replaced strontium or with hydrogen, argon or strontium alone. Characteristic strontium and argon emission was observed which supported a resonant-energy-transfer mechanism. Significant Balmer α line broadening corresponding to an average hydrogen atom temperature of 14, 24, and 23-45 eV was observed for strontium and argon-strontium rt plasmas and discharges of strontium-hydrogen, helium-hydrogen, argon-hydrogen, strontium-helium-hydrogen and strontium-argon-hydrogen, respectively, compared to ≈3 eV for pure hydrogen, krypton-hydrogen, xenon-hydrogen and magnesium-hydrogen. To achieve that same optically measured light output power, hydrogen-sodium, hydrogen-magnesium and hydrogen-barium mixtures required 4000, 7000 and 6500 times the power of the hydrogen-strontium mixture, respectively, and the addition of argon increased these ratios by a factor of about two. A glow discharge plasma formed for hydrogen-strontium mixtures at an extremely low voltage of about 2 V compared to 250 V for hydrogen alone and sodium-hydrogen mixtures, and 140-150 V for hydrogen-magnesium and hydrogen-barium mixtures.
If I would be in the position of BLP, I would try to figure out the tech of Rossi and replicate. Know your competition!
If I would be in the position of BLP, I would try to figure out the tech of Rossi and replicate. Know your competition!
If he does that, do not expect him to ever admit it! He does not like to be associated with LENR, much less Rossi. Odd, because it appears his early work was LENR based, but nowadays we are told he claims to have never done LENR.
If you ask me, I think LENR/Hydrino's are different sides of the same coin. I believe Wyttenbach thinks the same? If I am wrong about that, I will believe whatever he believes. 
this thread is a Rossi free zone or is it?
No, this thread is a Rossi zone. You wrote that wrong I know, and just giving you a hard time. You meant "is this a Rossi free *of criticism* zone". No it is not, and if you read the threads title, you will see that.
If he does that, do not expect him to ever admit it! He does not like to be associated with LENR, much less Rossi. Odd, because it appears his early work was LENR based, but nowadays we are told he claims to have never done LENR.
If you ask me, I think LENR/Hydrino's are different sides of the same coin. I believe Wyttenbach thinks the same? If I am wrong about that, I will believe whatever he believes.
i follow LENR since a little more than one year and I have personally experienced that Mainstream physists don't deal with LENR. This is like a no go area for the majority. Only a few brave dare to look under the carpet, like Dr. Egely (interesting presentation on ICCF21). And it is the same for a businesses.
Is this post on topic?
Yes, it is about Rossi‘s incredible and genius engineering skills he must have if you want to take him serious. Maybe he has already found a way to bend space time and create worm holes with his SKat to reach his dramatic Energy out >>> Energy in? F8
Zorud,
Yes. I think he may have done so. And I'm being very serious.
i follow LENR since a little more than one year and I have personally experienced that Mainstream physists don't deal with LENR. This is like a no go area for the majority. Only a few brave dare to look under the carpet, like Dr. Egely (interesting presentation on ICCF21). And it is the same for a businesses.
The only road to LENR credibility is making money at it...money talks. Rossi is the LENR developer that seems like the best bet at the money making game, But in order to make money, it is a very high hurdle to market a sucessful product. In a related note, it is hard to understand why LENR is such a forbidden subject. It not only that, all the related satellite subject areas are also tainted.
The only road to LENR credibility is making money at it...money talks. Rossi is the LENR developer that seems like the best bet at the money making game, But in order to make money, it is a very high hurdle to market a sucessful product. In a related note, it is hard to understand why LENR is such a forbidden subject. It not only that, all the related satellite subject areas are also tainted.
Axil, partially I think you are right. However I think LENR has also a strong strategic military impact. Just imagine what it would mean to combine drones or subs (like these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_212_submarine) with a LENR energy source? You can put your aircraft carriers onto the scrap yard!
I think this is also a very strong reason, why powers like US and Russia cannot be interested to publicly admit LENR.
It could, unfortunately, lead to the next arms race.
Director,
On Saturday you wrote about your concept of the power supply and in the last part of item 2 stated:
and then provide much lower voltage/current pulses at a range of hz up to or beyond 100khz.
Assumedly this is to maintain the plasma after the environment is ionized. Is there a reason that this "much lower voltage/current" is "pulses" rather than steady DC as in SAFIRE?
We can see on the oscilloscope that there are DC pulses after the initial higher voltage pulse.
Is there somewhere I can see some images of this oscilloscope trace?
Is there somewhere I can see some images of this oscilloscope trace?
see
Demonstration of the E-Cat QX - 24 November - Summary thread
See video
Any thoughts on what the scope traces represent?
The one thing I'm pretty certain of is that he is experiencing back spikes that go into the power supply. They cause over heating in the power supply that requires active cooling. This same phenomenon was experienced by Chernetsky and Correa.
Any thoughts on what the scope traces represent?
The one thing I'm pretty certain of is that he is experiencing back spikes that go into the power supply. They cause over heating in the power supply that requires active cooling. This same phenomenon was experienced by Chernetsky and Correa.
Very much like a high intensity discharge lamp, the excitation signal is radio frequency. This excites the production of visible and UV light, This photon energy source pumps the LENR active agent that is contained in the LENR fuel. This is like the Holmlid excitation method used to produce sub atomic particles via the action of hydrogen molecules. The reactor may contain xenon gas as the light producing actor.
It’s an Amplitude Modulated (AM) sinusoidal voltage with a positive bias/offset by the Amplitude (1/2 peak-to-peak). It can be done with relatively simple oscillators and amplifier. Does anyone have any insight as to what the voltage/current levels and frequency might be?
Hello John,
During the presentation in Stockholm it was mentioned that the frequency was around 100 kilohertz.
Check out if this blogpost by Mats Lewan could help you:
I have watched the Stockholm QX demo video and have some observations pertaining to a power supply spec. During the reactor test, the oscilloscope was connected across a 1ohm resistor in series with the power supply and the reactor so its waveform represents the circuit’s current and only gives indirect hints as about what the power supply voltage/waveform might be… While the circuit was being setup for the short circuit test, Rossi can be seen lifting the box up from the power supply and seemingly flipping several switches. Obviously, Rossi doesn’t want us to figure his system out. The waveforms seen during the subsequent short circuit and 800ohm load tests did not have the same AM sinusoidal characteristic as the reactor test and the on/off periods were closer to 2/11 seconds vs. 3/4 seconds.
I’ve just started learning about plasmas but I’d like to float the thought that the 100khz sinusoidal current through the reactor might be due to Langmuir wave oscillations in the plasma.
Interesting thought.
So do you think he is pulsing the reactor and each pulse is creating sinusoidal waves?
