Unluckily they stick to standard model math using SU(2)R X SU(2)L X U(1) where the can see symmetry braking but see no need to switch to SO(4)... to resolve the issue. As a consequence they only get some aspects of the solutions - smell/smoke of fire...
4D optics lasers
-
-
Sometimes we spend more time prevent a reaction then to intensify it.
-
Its galvanic corrosion
-
Its galvanic corrosion
OK, then how did it continue far beyond the creation of an open circuit?
-
There is plenty of material on low voltage discharge on the internet. it will give you a good understanding.
To get an understanding the soap I'm describing,we will need to wait.
-
Just look up galvanic corrosion , its unlikely you will see it as I described so we will need to wait for a friendly scientist to have time.
-
liquid aluminum, Seawater iron ect. There are mixes that are so violent you cant get away from them.
Sometimes there's no need to wait,
-
https://www.quantamagazine.org…superconductors-20181119/
Universal Quantum Phenomenon Found in Strange Metals
As they study the behavior of scrambled electrons using the holographic duality and other methods, researchers are gaining a sense of progress and partial insight. Some feel that the field is on a cusp of a conceptual breakthrough. Hartnoll said of the Planckian dissipation phenomenon, “I think it may be understood soon.”
There seems to be another connection between black holes ans superconductivity and it is holographic duality
-
With our luck the first time someone tests a theory that produced a signature of a strong lenr wave todays MSM will tell everyone its an act of war. That would be the luck~Seems like they spin everything
-
Not sure which dimension to post this in
Latest NPP update. from Jurg Wyttenbach.. my first reaction
https://www.researchgate.net/p…ergy_in_SO4_NPP216_update
For decades people have accepted and were taught that electrons do orbit nuclei and may acquire relativistic speed,
Agree..
eg Gold has color due to lightspeed electrons
So Scientists Say….
What is a contradiction with the fact that most electron mass already is at light speed.
News to me..
I need to read a lot ..GUTCP?
Again! OMG another Millsian headache for me
Unluckily nobody tried to understand experimental data, which shows a net excess mass of 4.884eV in the 4-He case.
Who cares about a mere 4.88
I’m not Germanic !
it leaves 4.884eV that cannot be explained by relativistic mass gain and is not measured or seen to be dissipated!
Who cares about a 4.884 ?
Out of 3,727,379,294. 111 ?
5e out of 4 billion euros ?
Maybe God is Germanic??
NIST [3] definitely, after 2010, started to use theory based fudge factors to correct the “wrong” 4-He mass
Politics in Physics.. ??
NISTgate!!
2010 mass 4-He being 4002603.2497 +-0.001 mamu's suddenly changed to 4002603.25413
Aha!! Online converter. (Mamu->eV) I’m so clever!!
3,728,399,369.827
-3.728,399,373,954 = 4.127 eV
So there IS a ~4eV political difference!!!!!
The big surprise is the fact that classic mechanics works fine and explains that the electron sub-orbit of (SU(2) x SU(2)) x SU(2) couples as expected in 2D and takes the exact amount of of the spin-spin pairing potential given by the rigid mass formula of the torus
This is where I stop..
I feel a 4d/6d headache..
Need some timeout…..
BTW... Oded Zilberberg et al have proved 4D exists in early 2018.
Zurich.??. where's that 6D proof ..due sometime 2019.
Note Axil.. there r no Einstein 3D+T dimensions in this.
-
My 4D/5D headache has abated somewhat.
Now I know what neutron excess energy is...
..the mc2 equivalent of the neutron mass excess (NMX)
(neutron mass = electron mass + proton mass + xs energy)
Measured as 782,332.874 eV
With his 4D Swiss knife, Wyttenbach whittled his (NMX) model
down from ~300 ev to 0.4 ev accuracy... now accuracy = 0.047ev .
USING A SPREADSHEET!!
This challenges the accuracy that Prof Andre asserted in Nov,2018
n fact, accurate standard model predictions of the proton
and neutron mass
have existed for a decade."
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v11/118
These accurate standard model predictions 2008?
show proton mass = neutron = 936 ± 25 MEV!!!
Are supercomputers really needed to estimate
neutron subtract proton
(NMX) = zero.... accuracy = ±50 MEV (50,000,000 eV)?
Fyodor et al are using a supercomputer blow drier.. not a Swiss knife!!!
