Magnetic field diode - researchers defy Maxwell law in 21st-century boost for energy efficiency

  • Circumventing Magnetostatic Reciprocity: A Diode for Magnetic Fields - Researchers defy 19th-century law of physics in 21st-century boost for energy efficiency


    See ArXiv preprint, also Magnetic field diode is a first, say physicists Engineers have long sought a comparable device that would direct magnetic fields in only one direction – something that would be incredibly useful in many technologies. Until now, however, the Lorentz reciprocity principle has been a formidable barrier to creating a practical magnetic field diode.

    The principle states that when a magnetic field source, such as a conducting wire coil, induces a field in a second source, the second will be able to induce a field in the first. Therefore, a magnetic field diode in which the field can only be transferred coil-to-coil in one direction should not be possible.


    rivE6jLl.png


    Illustration of the diode coils set within the U-shaped groove in the wall of the rotating cylinder. The cylinder is rotating to the right, which prevents the magnetic field from being transmitted to the left.

    Prat-Camps and colleagues identified a special situation where the symmetry dictated by the reciprocity principle can be broken. They found that this could be achieved if the two coils were placed within the walls of a hollow, conducting cylinder rotating at a constant velocity. The team then built a cylinder with walls that have a U-shaped groove containing the coils (see figure) and demonstrated its practicality in the lab.


    7TUD6FP.gif
    This device makes possible to transfer the magnetic field from a first magnetic element. When roles are inverted, and one tries to send magnetic field from the second to the first, no magnetic field is transferred. When the conductor is properly placed near to the magnetic elements and is moved at the right speed, the coupling between them becomes unidirectional, and a diode for magnetic fields is realized.


    Many overunity and antigravity devices utilize magnetic monopole compartment - their common idea is, quantum fluctuations of vacuum induce magnetic field which can get rectified into a permanent current by low-dimensional arrangement. The slowing of EM wave is crucial for various antigravity and overunity scenarios: in my theory the overunity is possible, once the energy density of physical system changes faster than the speed of energy propagation within it.


    Under such a situation the EM wave could effectively propagate faster than it should do in material given. This condition is also necessary for entropic time reversal, formation of magnetic monopoles, time crystals, antigravity thrusters violating inertia law etc (due to correspondence principle the violation of one fundamental law violates also many others related ones.) The propagation of electromagnetic waves along bifilar coils or within saturated ferromagnets comes on mind here.

  • In particular, N-Machine of Bruce De Palma can work on the principle of large magnetic diode. It's composed like Faraday's homopolar dynamo from 1831, where rotating conductor (massive rotating cylinder) breaks the symmetry of magnetic field.


    1Zkj3bl.gif HnZVHJR.gif

    .

    The basic concept of the DePalma generator is that a rotating disk magnet produces an electrical voltage and subsequent current between the center of the disk and the outer edge. Mr. DePalma's last experimental generator was designed to produce 12 volts DC at 10,000 amps while operating at 6,000 rpms. The diameter of the rotors was 12 inches and the total length of the test machine was approximately 3 feet.


    In his 1986 report, Kincheloe noted that the drag of the rotating magnetized gyroscope is only 13 to 20 percent of a conventional generator operating at an ideal 100 percent efficiency. The DePalma N-machine therefore could produce electricity at around 500 percent efficiency.


    Replacement of sliding carbon-graphite or copper-graphite brushes with liquid metal contacts reduces mechanical friction losses by 80%. The downside was that mercury from the brushes

    which adversely affected Bruce's health. The last device he built, the Quadropole generator, was reliably tested in New Zealand in 1996, and produced calometrically measured heat in excess of the total electrical energy powering the device.


    "If you can imagine it, it's imaginable - if it's imaginable, it must be real."


    _ Bruce DePalma, 1997

  • An experimental disproof of special relativity theory by unipolar induction


    Breaking Lorentz symmetry is extradimensional approach which opens the way for breaking thermodynamic causality and utilizing quantum mechanic phenomena for macroscopic overunity. The main trick is in propagation of electromagnetic field in environment, where speed of electromagnetic wave gets lower than the speed of spatial distribution of its energy density. We can achieve it by fast relocating of impedance of the environment so that distribution of speed of wave in space will propagate faster than the wave itself *).


    Of course instead of doing it by mechanical moving of conductor inside magnetic field it may get more effective to propagate magnetic field along stationary conductor in traveling wave of high frequency field. Most of motionless generators already utilize this principle, for example the classical D.M. Cook's or Tariel Kapanadze's generator (so-called Kapagen) can be examples of it.

    In particular Kapagen consist of pair of long concentric coils, one of which utilizes high number of windings and high voltage (for decreasing the loses being powered as a Tesla coil) which generates traveling magnetic field along massive grounded conductor or coil made by thick wire and second coil, which provides feedback for oscillator and it collects surplus of power from circuit by induction.


    I suspect that Cook's generator works in similar way, except that both coils are arranged in parallel and coupled by ferrite cores and one of them (made of thicker wire) remains shorted for to achieve the phase shift (traveling wave) along the coil.


    ) *In particular, electromagnetic wave within boson condensates, ferromagnets or along highly conductive materials (ideally superconductors) propagates so slowly, that we could relocate its energy density forcefully, thus separating its electric and magnetic components into an anapole field. This Lorentz symmetry breaking comes as a consequence of mass energy equivalence in Schrodinger equation of quantum mechanics, according to which the energy density always remains proportional the probability density in each time and space interval. Literally speaking, quantum fluctuations of vacuum will "try to catch up", while providing the energy for it from vacuum via thermal fluctuations of material, which should cool itself accordingly. The whole process would thus violate second law of thermodynamics macroscopically.

  • So that once again, brief executive summary:


    Magnetic monopole is critical part of overunity and antigravity systems as it violates Lorentz symmetry and potentially also thermodynamics.

    "Magnetic field diode" is actually magnetic monopole of sort and it can be created by propagating magnetic field along (super)conductor, which makes it asymmetric.


    JYheezx.gif

  • See for example Podkletnov antigravity device. Electric coils aren't there just for "levitation of superconductor disk". They're fundamental part of the device principle.

    For example, on the right is the scheme of device, on which Britons tested the Podkletnov effect. "Why the hell we should levitate superconductor by some magnets?",

    they probably did say for yourself. "It looks so impractical - it even cannot be cooled well". So that they went, made experiment - and they indeed didn't find any effect.


    ASe2ZHM.jpg  FGOD05K.gif

    • Official Post

    I have made a simpler version of a magnetic diode than this- simply a toroidal coil inside another toroidal coil. Since the field around a toroidal magnet tends to stick close to its outer surface although it fills the central space (the hole in the doughnut) induced currents are transferred much more efficiently from the outside of the system to the inside than the other way around. More than two nested toroids improves this effect even more, though overall system efficiency is low in that case.

  • Quote

    the field around a toroidal magnet tends to stick close to its outer surface although it fills the central space (the hole in the doughnut)

    Magnetic field of toroidal magnet is supposed to follow the interior of torus. Do You have picture of Your arrangement, plz?


    45dpAl0.gif

    • Official Post

    Photos? not any more I'm afraid, I did this over 10 years ago and they are possibly on a preserved hard drive, but then again maybe not- the curse of digital storage. The trick is to construct the inner toroid so it is a close fit into the outer. You can also see from your picture above that because the coil turns are always closer together inside the ring than the outside of it simple geometry makes for more efficient transfer going inwards than outwards. Not having access to a FEMM simulator at the time I depended on measurements to see what was happening. Also in your drawing of a single toroid the field lines have nothing to couple to inside the ring, but if you put another core inside they will do so and under the right conditions will saturate it. Especially if it a high-permeability core like amorphous iron.


    I also experimented with using a solenoid coil on a ferrite rod passed at 90 degrees through the hole- but can't remember how that worked out. The thing always is to be able to differentiate between weak coupling because of poor flux transfer both ways, and weak coupling due a directional effect, which is not always easy- there are frequency-related effects that can be exploited too, because of differing hysteresis between core materials. The nice thing is that these are cheap clean experiments you can do on the kitchen table using a scope or even a multimeter, not nearly so messy and equipment-hungry as LENR.

    • Official Post

    Zephir_AWT

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Russian global wave YouTube channel recently covered these guys.

    The inventor claims that he managed to develop a device based on known physical principles to produce new form of ionizing radiation cased by nuclear effects.

    He shows led diods being lit up on the distance,

    Electric motor made without any metal. Few other things.

    There is a video where he shows radiation readings exceeding lethal levels by order of magnitude yet it is harmeless.

    Judging by the theme of the vidoes, we should expect an ICO soon.

  • In his 1986 report, Kincheloe noted that the drag of the rotating magnetized gyroscope is only 13 to 20 percent of a conventional generator operating at an ideal 100 percent efficiency. The DePalma N-machine therefore could produce electricity at around 500 percent efficiency.


    33 years now since the claimed break-through and not a single device on the market... Worse than LENR albeit much simpler to build. It's Christmas time and may be wishes will be heard...

  • Quote

    33 years now since the claimed break-through and not a single device on the market


    Pluralistic ignorance just argues the lack of interest by lack of applications. But does it really imply that these solutions don't work? When scientists ignored Copernicus and Galileo for two hundred years, does it imply that heliocentric model is BS? For example Scientists in the U.S. and Japan Get Serious About Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions - but are they really interested about it?

    IMO people just became ignorant, lethargic and lazy as sh*t - which is exactly where the globalist companies and powerfuls of this world want us to have it.


    Arthur Schopenhauer: "A man can do what he wants, but not want what he wants". We are free to do whatever we desire. But we are not free to choose our desires.

  • What makes dielectric rotor spin?


    Which rotor are you talking about? This video presents rather classical electrostatic motor. Your video presents standard industrial LEDs, the glowing of which is attributed to "ionizing radiation", which is clearly nonsense: for to have them glowing these LEDs must be handled in a way, which allows induced current to pass through them. If "ionizing radiation" would be present, they would glow all the time.

  • Pluralistic ignorance just argues the lack of interest by lack of applications. But does it really imply that these solutions don't work? When scientists ignored Copernicus and Galileo for two hundred years, does it imply that heliocentric model is BS?


    May be your sight on the world is somewhat distorted:

    Regarding Galileo: The Pope and his advisers very well understood what he did. They also supported him until he died. The matter was simply a political one...

    The Egypt's didn't need Coperincus to calculate the radius of the earth. It was just brute force labor - ramming sticks into the soil - over a range, both south - of about 1000 km's! - and measuring the angle of the shadows...


    Now you might understand that Galileo was not prior art it was at least the 10th re-detection of something man new since thousands of years.


    But what you posted about "free energy" machines is silly/simple that everybody could construct it and everybody would do it, if it would work as you claim.


    Why don't you try it and tell us??

  • Quote

    The Pope and his advisers very well understood what he did. They also supported him until he died.


    This is also why I talked about scientists ignoring Galileo - not Holy Church. Maybe your sight of my sight was somewhat distorted.


    Quote

    But what you posted about "free energy" machines is silly/simple that everybody could construct it and everybody would do it, if it would work as you claim.


    So far I'm not aware, that for example DePalma N-machine was attempted to replicate. Why nobody has attempted for it, if it's so simple and it promises profit?
    Why people refused to look through Galielo telescope if they could get immediate evidence for heliocentric system with it?

    • Official Post

    Tewari who worked for the Indian Electricity Board (I think) did replicate the N-Machine, as did a number of others. There was at one time the rotor of a huge faraday-type generator standing outside the gates of a NZ university famous for engineering. The most recent attempt I am aware of was a US company in NY state called - from memory- Archer Energy Systems. AFAIK they are defunct and hard to find on the web these days- but they had some interesting ideas about.

  • Some consequences of DePalma's machine are indeed bizarre. We could for example couple homopolar motor and generator to a single shaft and wire them against each other with sliding contact. The current generated by one half would power another one and alleged surplus of energy would keep whole device in neverending motion. Because such a system is solely symmetrical, it's not even clear, in which direction it should rotate.

    DaukM2Q.gif

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.