...If you simply remove the electrons (or shrink the orbits) and stick a hell of a lot of neutrons together, you are going to get something that looks a lot like a black hole.
Isn't what you describe a Neutron Star?
...If you simply remove the electrons (or shrink the orbits) and stick a hell of a lot of neutrons together, you are going to get something that looks a lot like a black hole.
Isn't what you describe a Neutron Star?
All we can "see" and detect in different spectra, including jets of radiation and "spewed out" matter doesn't come from inside a black hole (based on currently accepted knowledge(. What's happening exactly at and beyond the event horizon / SR will probably remain just a theory for a long time, if not forever...the only thing what we know better today - again a confirmation of an important topic in Einsteins theory of relativity - is generation (and detection) of gravity waves (LISA and merging BH's). BH's can obviously grow by merging with other BH's (but also losing huge mass via gravity waves), or by swallowing other interstellar matter (e.g. gas, stars)...
Isn't what you describe a Neutron Star?
According to the theory, probably quite similar, except that a black hole is spinning much faster, so is more like a solenoid, whereas a neutron star does not have the same angular momentum, so remains more spherical. Unclear whether the masses are neutrons, nucleons or atoms with highly contracted electrons. Potentially the neutron star is more neutral and the black hole is more charged, with greater separation of positive and negative components.
And anyway, who are You to critizize either Shannon or Hawking ?
You miss the point: Black hole people believe that information must be conserved inside a black hole what is absolute nonsense!
You miss the point: Black hole people believe that information must be conserved inside a black hole what is absolute nonsense!
aha. That was the topic to be argued about.
Basically I favorize Your point of view. Nothing survives in a black hole, so why should information be an exception?
Talking ala Shannon, information is a degree of entropy, right ?
information is a degree of entropy
Entropy is a degree of order...
" aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
is extremely ordered, with low entropy.. but is information poor.
No point to arguie about, to be seen, at least by me.
Entropy is a degree of order...
" aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
is extremely ordered, with low entropy.. but is information poor.
Only information poor in this context, in other context - for an easy example a string of telemetry data - your ''a'' might be very information-rich. It is a mistake to view information as an absolute, like beauty it is in the eye of the beholder.
Equally, Hawkin radiation might contain a great deal of information leaving a black hole, the beauty and complexity of which we have yet to appreciate.
Only information poor in this context, in other context - for an easy example a string of telemetry data - your ''a'' might be very information-rich. It is a mistake to view information as an absolute, like beauty it is in the eye of the beholder.
Equally, Hawkin radiation might contain a great deal of information leaving a black hole, the beauty and complexity of which we have yet to appreciate.
It could be interesting in ..if a DNA type membrane was used as a ...rabbit hole~ ..
for an easy example a string of telemetry data
True.... a string of 158 a"'s has some meaning for a college educated staphylococcus phage
The string of A's carries an infinity of information about what the string of A's is not. That's a lot of information.
live video on a black hole
view from the front.. or back .. side view.. I wish they would have spent a lot more time discussing the image.
A sun with a cold spot from ir res.
true of false?
books will be written.
view from the front.. or back .. side view.. I wish they would have spent a lot more time discussing the image.
A sun with a cold spot from ir res.
true of false?
books will be written.
The view is most likely pole on since the accretion disk disk circles the equator of the black hole.
The view is most likely pole on since the accretion disk disk circles the equator of the black hole.
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
This does not really explain the ligther-darker sections ( which, in contrast, really indicate, that one side is nearer towards us, than the other.
Whichever way the BH is oriented there would be a halo visible, gravity bends light from the accretion disc to make it appear so, whether viewed 'pole' on or towards the equator.
Whichever way the BH is oriented there would be a halo visible, gravity bends light from the accretion disc to make it appear so, whether viewed 'pole' on or towards the equator.
similar to what I wanted to state, but the question is still a valid one: Which perspective are we, the observers, sitting at?
I think you will have to wait for some more info to be released by the astronomy team. I think the fact that one side of the halo is brighter than the other will give clues to those 'skilled in the art'.
It might also depend on how many dimensions are involved 3 or 4 or 5?
" 5 dimensional theory could break the laws of physics"
Very much an armchair science
experimental science is a bit tricky given the time and space separation