We're pulling this 1 Dimensional theory discussion from various areas of LENR-Forum as well as elsewhere on the web.
How do you convince a skeptic?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's the place to start when discussing 1 dimensional amplification effects.
Basically, if a linear "AstroBlaster" tube effect can be in place, then the 1 dimensional collisions are amplified and may be enough to overwhelm the Coulomb barrier and cause Fusion.
How would a linear tube effect happen? By constraining the degrees of motion for Hydrogen trapped in a lattice structure of Nickel, or Deuterium trapped in a lattice structure of Paladium. The atoms will collide on a 1 dimensional path.
That is the commonality between Zephir's 1 Dimensional Theory and my 1 Dimensional Theory.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.4physics.com/catalo…t_info.php/products_id/91
AstroBlaster®
The toy modeled after the dynamics of an exploding Super Nova! The famous astrophysicist, Dr. Stirling Colgate, created the Astro-Blaster® to demonstrate the awesome kinetic power of a super-nova.
Simply hold the Astro-Blaster® in front of you, drop on a flat surface and watch as only the top ball "blasts off" into the air - UP TO 5 TIMES THE HEIGHT DROPPED!
Each Astro-Blaster® comes with a story explaining how this toy and a super-nova are related. Each Astro-Blaster® also comes with two extra balls - because this much fun can't be contained indoors!
Play our virtual try before you buy!
http://www.4physics.com/catalog/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Vortex I proposed a 1dimensional Bose-Einstein-Condensate theory, and the response was that this aligned with the Luttinger Liquid model, which has very recently been supported in experiment.
-———————http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg89493.html————————
So maybe it will be known as the Vibrating 1 Dimensional Luttinger Liquid BEC theory, the V1DLLBEC.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you convince a skeptic?
Zephir_AWT
Member
Likes Received757
Wednesday, 11:26 pm
+2
#373
The key for exploiting and utilizing high-dimensional phenomena which would break the 3D thermodynamics is in utilizing lower-than-three dimensional geometry and arrangement. This aspect is pervading like Ariadne's red silk of destiny all breakthrough findings of the last decades.
At the case of cold fusion the basic exploit of low-dimensional geometry is rather simple and it follows from attenuation of energy during piston collisions. Actually one of mainstream approaches to hot fusion is already based on the concept of colliding pistons, but it's still contaminated with classical 3D approach: the pistons are used for concentration of energy into a single point and for formation of dense plasma, the particles of which will still collide in 3D. The problem of 3D plasma approach is, it not only increases the temperature by adiabatic compression, but it also greatly dilutes and scatters energy during mutual collisions of its particles.
Piston fusion schematic
https://i.imgur.com/l6l1sQk.gif
But what if we would exclude the 3D concept from 1D fusion completely and leave atom nuclei colliding along long rigid chains like sorta miniature pistons? And this is IMO just what the cold fusion is actually all about: the miniaturized one-dimensional piston fusion, arranged with single rows of atoms! I collected multiple indicia for this mechanism already, but IMO the most prominent one is the Unified Gravity approach to cold fusion, which consists of shooting protons into surface of molten lithium (BTW note how thorough and specific this particular patent application actually is!). During this the fusion readily runs in high yield under formation of alpha particles according two main reactions:
p+6Li ? 3He (2.3 MeV) + 4He (1.7 MeV) and p+7Li ? 4 He (8.6 MeV) + 4He (8.6 MeV)
This type of fusion resembles many unsuccessful attempts for hot fusion in colliders, but the spectacular point here is, only very low energy of protons is actually required here for to have fusion running - just about one thousand of Volts or even less - so that we can really talk about "cold" fusion here, despite it's still classical "accelerator" based approach like the fusor.
But the most spectacular aspect of this arrangement is in point, it runs only when the surface of lithium remains tightly bellow its melting point - not less, not more. Here we have nuclear reaction running at MeV scale which not only requires input energy just at one keV scale, but this reaction can be even modulated by energy changes at the milielectronvolt scale - which is simply unbelievable according to laws of thermodynamics and all activation energy theorems, which follow from it. Which also enforces me in conviction, that this way of fusion is not fake, because you couldn't invent such an insight ad-hoc: one must really observe something like it for being able to bring it up.
My explanation of this fascinating subtlety is, the surface of molten lithium bellow its melting point remains semicrystalline due to surface tension forces with planes of atoms perfectly arranged in sort of crystal lattice. So that once proton hits some lithium atom at the surface, this energy is mediated and transferred along long line of adjacent lithium atoms - but not to neighboring atoms, which would dilute and scatter the energy of impact into an outside. The classical thermodynamics developed for large atom ensembles colliding in 3D thus cannot be applied here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you convince a skeptic?
#375
Zephir_AWT wrote:
But what if we would exclude the 3D concept from 1D fusion completely and leave atom nuclei colliding along long rigid chains like sorta miniature pistons? And this is IMO just what the cold fusion is actually all about: the miniaturized one-dimensional piston fusion, arranged with single rows of atoms!
This is exactly what I postulated several years ago with my V1DLLBEC theory. Vibrating 1Dimensional Lutinger Liquid Bose Einstein Condensate Theory.
https://www.google.com/search?…0j33i299j0i13.o6fTuxqca1w
https://www.google.com/search?…0j33i299j0i13.o6fTuxqca1w
Zephir_AWT and steppenwolf like this.
Online
Member
Likes Received621
Thursday, 2:57 am
#376
Zephir_AWT wrote:
p+6Li ? 3He (2.3 MeV) + 4He (1.7 MeV) and p+7Li ? 4 He (8.6 MeV) + 4He (8.6 MeV)
This type of fusion resembles many unsuccessful attempts for hot fusion in colliders, but the spectacular point here is, only very low energy of protons is actually required here for to have fusion running - just about one thousand of Volts or even less - so that we can really talk about "cold" fusion here, despite it's still classical "accelerator" based approach like the fusor.
Zephir, I like this approach very much. We should start a thread for this 1 dimensional theoretical approach.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you convince a skeptic?
Zephir_AWT
Member
Likes Received757
16 hours ago
#382
Quote
This is exactly what I postulated several years ago with my V1DLLBEC theory. Vibrating 1Dimensional Luttinger Liquid Bose Einstein Condensate Theory.
http://sjbyrnes.com/cf/can-deu…dium-condense-into-a-bec/
Well, it isn't - but your theory goes actually deeper. Please note that mechanism which I proposed above has actually no quantum mechanics involved - it's solely mechanical. But I agree it's not the whole story - I'm myself proponent of many quantum and scalar physics anomalies occurring along long chains of compact matter. I think, that cold fusion is synergy of multiple phenomena - just some mechanisms are more dominant and some less, some are primarily and some others are derived from them. I actually believe, most of cold fusion theories are actually relevant at the same moment.
Quote
We should start a thread for this 1 dimensional theoretical approach.
There is already thread about this theory
The general cold fusion theory aka the broad view of LENR
and another ones about additional aspects of it. The problem of this forum is, it doesn't support coherent discussion both technically (it's linear and even Google search works better than the one on this forum), both from its liberal moderation perspective (despite Alan does his very best, too many people clutter threads with their divergent or even openly hostile posts here). The streamlined low-dimensional approach is the key of success not only for cold fusion - but also for discussion about it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------