Quote from Zephir_AWT

This model could explain observation of long filaments of Rydberg hydrogen atoms by Holmlid.

If you ever did stockpile a set of strong magnets then you know why Holmlid sees some long chains of magnetic hydrogen. In Mills H* case these chains spawn up to 50cm!

Linear effects are very important inside cavities as the thermodynamic degree of freedom is reduced from 3 to 1. You can easily show with conventional math/physics that at low pressure BEC will happen even at room temperature. This is no magic and predicted by 100 year old models.

Breather as proposed by Dubinko never ramp up to energies needed to kinetically induce LENR. In fact they stay in chemical range. But a coherent field could allow to dissipate LENR energy much more efficient( faster) than phonons! The problem of LENR is not ignition because we exactly know that the UDH matter can be built any time as the dE with a conventional orbit is below 1eV.

Now you are ready to understand the key question. If only e.g. 0.1 eV is needed to produce UDH, why isn't it happening all the time? The answer is simple 0.1eV is a potential but the delta energy is produced by rotations. In fact you need at least two rotations (magnetic field) to couple to the proton field to take out about 4keV, what is the energy level of UDH (deep D-D "bond")

As Holmlid reports. The photons from the lab light can ignite UDH!

Could the BEC state be an explanation of neutron emission from deuterium cooled by liquid nitrogen? 2004

https://www.researchgate.net/p…origin=publication_detail

Akito Takahashi appears to be creating his memoirs.

I hope this is not all he is doing.

Quote

Are you trying to give a nod to Ed Storms's LENR crack theory?

Of course, inside nanocracks and dislocations not only the atoms get arranged linearly - but also constrained in free motion perpendicularly to nanocrack axis by molecular and Casimir forces. The usage of whiskers for nickel fusion by Piantelli is direct application of low-dimensional theory. Whiskers are formed by single lone dislocation in its axis.

Quote

Infinite-dimensional symmetry opens up possibility of a new perspective of old physics - It opens more possibilities to shimmy crack theories by passing math formula artefacts for real things that is all.

It's just model like everything else. All models are wrong in wider perspective, just some are useful. The AWT is based on fully random aether as there is no good reason why Universe should be based on right-angled Cartesian formal system invented by men. In particular all high dimensional models rely on models of hyperdimensional particles or hyperdimensional space - but never both. Once the Universe gets really hyperdimensional, then the space inside it is not flat anymore, which will break the mathematical description of the hyperdimensional objects inside it - this is also the origin of string theory's fuzziness and fiasco.

Therefore all hyperdimensional models have meaning only when space-time remains only slightly curved, so than we can consider it flat. It's approximate model only.

Quote

Breather as proposed by Dubinko never ramp up to energies needed to kinetically induce LENR. In fact they stay in chemical range

Yep, but only until they involve only pair of atoms. Along longer chain of atoms the 1D Mossbauer effect and amplification of energy may occur - and the energy levels achievable increase with number of atoms inside chains geometrically not linearly. Not only speed gets multiplied with number of atoms, but also the inertia of their stack and the energy and momentum is product of both.

In this way or another, no physical effect of single atom can explain overcoming of Coulomb barrier by itself - the involvement of another atoms must be therefore considered.

Quote

You can easily show with conventional math/physics that at low pressure BEC will happen even at room temperature

This expectation is directly related to expectations of room superconductivity, because superconductivity also requires formation of entangled state of electrons, where charge spreads in waves instead of by particles. And ultraconductors are known from 1986. The trick for their preparation is actually similar to tricks used for cold fusion running - the electrons must get arranged linearly along chains and these chains must be long enough. The electron Cooper pairs work for low temperatures only and we already discussed it here. You may think, that charged channels of ultraconductors are direct analogy of Storm's nanocracks and Piantelli's whiskers.

Quote

American physicist Joaquin Mazdak Luttinger in 1963, came up with a mathematical model showing that the effects of one particle on all others in a one-dimensional line would be much greater than in two- or three-dimensional spaces.

Yes and one of features of dense model is, it predicts this effect on various scales. It's extrapolation of LeSage model of gravity. In this model the gravity arises by shielding of longitudinal waves of vacuum between massive bodies, which leads into excess of virtual photons there (and gravitational lensing). But neighboring massive objects aren't inert for this effect as they can shield the longitudinal waves too. Once they stay along single line (as it's common during solar eclipses and planetary conjunction), this effect multiplies and it leads to concentration of virtual scalar waves along their connection line. The excess of longitudinal waves is also typical for Casimir effect, which applies at short distances. Therefore the attenuated quantum entanglement along long chains of objects is analogous to Allais effect between planets - it's dark matter effect in essence. The pseudoforce generated by it may even lead into establishing a new generation of bosons, which have close connection to supersymetry and which may explain the formation of spiral tracks and emanation of EVO's during fusion. Therefore the cold fusion research would be ideal kindergarden for stringy and susy theorists - the only problem is, it's all based on anomalies which mainstream physics avoids like devil the cross not only for its own bad, but also for bad of the whole human civilization. It's not normal kind of stupidity: it's stupidity squared.

Here is Piantelli's statement from his patent paper: 6.7 MEV is not so distant from 17 MeV of Hungarian boson

"More in detail, during the process of orbital capture, H- ions can lose its own couple of electrons and form protons 1H+. A first fraction of the protons 1H+ is subjected to direct nuclear capture reactions by the nuclei of the same atoms of the clusters in which the orbital capture has occurred, while a second fraction of the protons 1H+ can be expelled by Coulomb repulsion from the nucleus of the metal atom where the orbital capture has taken place. The expelled protons have an energy that can be determined and characterised. For instance, in the case of Nickel, this energy is about 6.7 MeV, as detected by a Wilson chamber, on the basis of Bethe's equation. A part of the protons of the second portion, which does not react with other nuclei of the primary material, can leave the latter and interact with a material adapted to give rise to proton- dependent reactions, if this is present."

The X-boson has been observed in Hungary during decay of beryllium nuclei just because these nuclei are also elongated - they've character of dumbbell rather than sphere. It's not therefore the artifact of electron shielding (electrons are very lightweight for 6.7 MeV, after all), but atom nuclei shielding. One of reasons, which mainstream physics ignores the research of this effects is, they actually occur at quite low energies - but SuSy research in colliders is oriented to futile search at TeV scale- and the building of large colliders represents too good and stable job for many people involved. I'm pretty sure that SuSy has been already observed in LHC too - but intentionally swept under carpet for not to interfere the building of even larger collider.

Nice papers, but they only partially account for PdH or NiH based LENR - They are correct in proposing BEC's underlying PdD LENR but there must be additional mechanisms involved to account for P-P or P-D fusion phenomena. One interesting possibility is that both PdD and NiH both show high temp superconductor properties at high loading ratios with Tc around 60K . So a fraction of the electrons are 'superconducting electrons' arranged in Cooper pairs, a fraction which increases as the temperature is lowered to near 60K. How these superconducting electron clusters might induce or increase the probability of fusion reactions of lattice bound P or D is unknown, but maybe Cooper pairs can function like muons ( but have a much longer half-life ) and catalyse fusion in a similar way by lowering the effective C-barrier. If this is true then other high temperature superconductors, possibly the Fe - based SC's may be equally or more effective crystal lattices. Certainly a research avenue worth exploring.

Quote

I think when it all gets figured out, LENR will have ended up being a very complicated phenomena.

It depends on particular system, but IMO it's main principle is as simple as this

Quote from Zephir_AWT

but IMO it's main principle is as simple as this

the devil is in the details

- what force is involved- a contact force as in macroscopic objects or a remote force

-is the remote force Coulombic, magnetic or other.

-what particles are involved... protons neutrons electrons or whole atoms

-where do the 200 or 500 kev transient photons coming from.

-how is the 2,200,000 eV packet of energy from DD fusion dissipated to become half a billion packets of low grade heat at less than ~0.1 or so eV

- what ignition energy is required ? 0.1eV? ,1eV,100eV,1000eV???

etc etc

Quote

As soon as you start extrapolating extradimensionalism from it, you're going pretty far afield

As I told you above, this model is mechanical and as such 3D only. But once you're introducing quantum mechanics and/or ever Lutinger model into it, then you're already getting extradimensional. Most people don't realize, that Casimir and dipole forces are already extradimensional ones... Just the fact we're giving some force special name from historical etc.. reasons doesn't make it three-dimensional.

Quote

what force is involved- a contact force as in macroscopic objects or a remote force -is the remote force Coulombic, magnetic or other.

Which forces are involved, once atoms collide? It depends on particular situation. The momentum conservation law and Astroblaster effect doesn't care about nature of forces involved.

Quote from [email protected]

- what ignition energy is required ? 0.1eV? ,1eV,100eV,1000eV???

According to Holmlid switching on the lab light is enough to trigger strong nuclear reactions in UDH/UDD. So we talk about 1..4 eV.

But the question about ignition energy is wrong as physics is wrong since 80 years. There is virtually no energy needed to trigger fusion. The worst way to try triggering fusion is using high energy particles. High energies casually work due to side effects that STDM does not understand.

The key question is: How can we take out energy of a three times 4D rotating magnetic field. Best solution: Attached D-D on 1D carrier and stimulate the magnetic collapse.