Now back to the science
Not quite..
SplitEnz.. 1981 history never repeats
the post1989 sequelae
shouldn't repeat if LENR researchers
learn from the mistakes
of the past
Now back to the science.
For me, not everyone else. This is Ruby's thread, and music is what she wants, so music is what she will get! Carry on.
There you have it. Blend of science "hot, hot, hot" (Lugano style 
), with great music. Love that Caribbean flavor.
Dug it out of my collection. Listening to it now. Looks like "D to He" may not be the only one.
Display MoreI guess the talk was based on Miles' retrospective January,2019 paper
The Production Of Helium In Cold Fusion Experiments
Which concluded
"" Nevertheless, the reported helium-4 detection limit by both CalTech and MIT was one part per million (ppm) or 1000 ppb.
By using Equations 1 with R = 1000 ppb (1.0x10-6), the excess power would have to be 8.94 W. From Table 1,
1000 ppb helium-4 would require more than 20 times the highest excess power listed for our experiments or about 10 W.
With such a large excess power, most calorimetric cells would be driven to boiling just by the fusion energy alone.
Such large amounts of excess enthalpy would be very obvious even without the use of calorimetry,
but the amounts of helium-4 produced would barely reach the detection limit reported by these two prestigious universities.
Why was such a glaring error in the CalTech and MIT results missed by the reviewers for these publications? I
t seems like almost anything was accepted by major journals, such as Nature and Science, in 1989
if it helped to establish the desired conclusion that reports of cold fusion were not correct.
The answer to the last question might include the two words "" reviewer bias""..
something to be aware of in all peer reviews of paradigm breaking research.
Extraordinary evidence ( rather than sufficient scientific evidence) is needed to overcome extraordinary unscientific bias.
Holy crapoly. Who is that freak????
That was 2012 when I was at the Art/Sci Leonardo series (I think that was what it was called) at the Nano Institute UCLA. I wanted them to host a cold fusion meeting, but that didn't happen....
Melvin Miles has a "new" formula for computing the theoretical amount of helium generated - when using Pd-D - given only excess power and the current. His presentation consisted of computing the theoretical amount of helium for his previous work and comparing to the amount measured. They are in agreement.
Here is the .pdf file.
Or this one unfortunately like Pons and Fleischmann "Heroes, just for one day"
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Did you check out the podcast with Dr. Stephen C. Bannister. He talks about the UUtah sentiment on campus. Only a few are on board with the reality. The rest have no idea what they let go. One day, the statue of Drs. Fleischmann and Pons will dominate that landscape.
Display Morehttps://www.researchgate.net/p…origin=publication_detail
Actually Melvin Miles did not have sufficient power levels to generate 1000ppb
but managed to detect 8.5 ppb.. after lots of work.
Probably in Essex with excess power in the 10- 50...100W?? level
the task of He4 detection should be easier..
1ppm is not enough for a party balloon though.
His power levels are indeed low. However, the amount of helium is commeasurte with the power level (excepting down at 0.020 watts which was at the limit of detection for Miles.
FWIW, I think mmckubre looks like the Procol Harum guy, and Magic like the drummer in the Moody Blues (Prince Albert Hall) concert. Now back to the science.
For me, not everyone else. This is Ruby's thread, and music is what she wants, so music is what she will get! Carry on.
March 23 is a day for the whole planet. The gift we have yet to open.....
I totally didn't do any tweeting or anything as I was so busy - helping out here and there too - I forgot about #NearmissDay which was Joris' idea. It's a good connection.... Next time!
I guess the conventional MIT nuclear people were elsewhere last weekend??
RobertB- there was separate mainstream physics gathering but some key folks stopped by for key talks.
The tide is starting to turn.
rubycarat ahh another StephenC I thought I was unique!
Thought I’d better clear that up just in case...
Curious to take look at Dr Stephen C Bannisters pod cast now though.
I hope the event went well. This is quite some anniversary.
People - just like electrons!
The party Sat night was a blast. Anthropocene kicked it out. The chardonnay was flowing and everyone was talking across the tables - it was so loud that you had to shout to the person sitting next to you! I was drinking water at first, but broke down to join in the excitement and got a little tipsy myself, literally jumping up and down with excitement. What a dork. I met many new people, and wished I had gotten to do video interviews with more people than I did. I missed a number of folks and I'm sorry about that! Abd was there and I didn't interview him as by Sunday 5:30PM, I was beat and could barely speak anymore.
I am making a movie for the general public, but it's a long term project. There will be opportunity to speak with more people.
Anthropocene will come out with a short video doc sometime soon though and it will be really good. Richard Chan and Frank Ling were filming and doing interviews too. Richard Chan is a verifiable polymath and did a lecture on the patent office's G21B 3/00 designation https://www.uspto.gov/web/pate…ml/cpc-G21B.html#G21B3/00
and showed a graph he made that reveals a change in their acceptance patterns. It appears as if there are more patents being filed in this area - and being accepted. He will make his slides available and I think everyone will find them encouraging.
I will just mention that Carl Page did an EXCELLENT lecture about the general planetary situation and what the nuclear solution can offer. I was interested to hear that he did not believe the cold fusion scientists at first, understanding that nuclear reactions in a solid are impossible. But his open mind (and likely incrementally good news) made him research and learn and he realized that something was there. His involvement is growing as there is a strong and passionate commitment to save the oceans and wildspaces. He is clearly concerned about climate change and sees LENR as a solution. He talks about other nuclear - small, new-style kinds of fission - and also supports maintaining conventional nuclear that already exists. We are lucky that he has entered this field and is committed to it. Who else with resources like that is making public media and advocating? Apparently, he hangs with more engineers than techies, so among his "peers", he does not experience too much derisive responses.
Larry Forsley also talked about his NASA work on the hybrid fusion-fission reactor, but got to go now.....Boston Logan airport calls....
rubycarat It sounds like it was really great.
I have a real feeling the walls are finally coming down. And people are ready and starting to think about this.
I think many of us can identify with Carl Page’s thoughts. I certainly came to LENR with assumptions and am now astonished about the amount of material and concepts I have learned since. I think this is probably something everyone can identify with supporter and critic alike.
It’s great this event happend a wave in the right place can move a mountain.... or perhaps I should say another kind of wave can move a crowd.
I want to thank Ruby for inviting us to contribute musical linx, and I want to thank all the contributors who did so.
An awesome evening of entertainment...
skip
Arthur Brown - Fire
And some might disagree with this choice but...
The Animals - House of rising sun
"...it's been the ruin of many a poor boy...
you poisoned the sky and the sea
Reminds me of the theme song to Firefly, the cold-fusion powered spaceship.
You can burn the land and you can boil the sea
but you can't take the sky from me
Firefly Theme - To the Black
Browncoats
Take my love, take my land,
Take me where I can not stand
I don't care cause i'm still free
you can't take the sky from me.
Take me out, to the black,
tell them I ain't coming back
burn the land and boil the sea
you can't take the sky from me.
There's no place I can be
Since I found Serenity
burn the land and boil the sea
you can't take the sky from me.
you can't take the sky from me.
you can't take the sky from me.
you can't take the sky
you can't take the sky
you can't take the sky from me.
guitar solo
There's no place I can be
Since I found Serenity
burn the land and boil the sea
you can't take the sky from me.
you can't take the sky from me.
you can't take the sky from me.
you can't take the sky
you can't take the sky
you can't take the sky from me.
I guess the conventional MIT nuclear people were elsewhere last weekend??
And where was Rossi?... The genius who has mastered LENR already years ago, as many here believe.
Btw, I am a bit suprised that nobody proposed this song for the playlist:
, I am a bit suprised that nobody proposed this song for the playlist
Well ,Dewey was there I think ...he is not nobody
However this song(2019) is rather too modern for the 80's 90's playlist.
and Rossi has zero to do with Fleischmann and Pons
For Assisi,Italy in September a 1987 song might suit Rossi
Si Puo' Dare Di Piu .You can give more.
Not for members but for ~Clearance Items
