There is not yet a clear theory that can make predictions.
True predictions of completely new facts can rarely be made. The only strong one we have so far is the quantization of the proton magnetic moment. (A bit weaker of the electron too). We also predict spectral shifts of known isotope lines due to the proton magnetic moment quantization. But as usual a model must fit the experiments and if none happen we produce just vapor ware.
But the main task of any physical model is the prediction of physical facts. We also call such a theory exact. E.g. Newton mechanics, Maxwell's electro dynamic etc... are exact tom a large known extent.
But SM,QED etc. are never exact. They are far off.
NPP2.0 is exact in describing the formation process of masses or in calculating magnetic moments or ionization energies. We also can exactly give the fake Higgs mass.
The main target is to show the folk,s that the current approach is a complete fail because it is based on inadequate math and wrong gauging. The true universe is all magnetic. But SM,QED use Coulomb potentials in 3D,t. They did start with the top of the pyramid as the foundation (base to start upwards) - simply the worst thing that could have been done. Charge associated mass in any nucleus is a tiny fraction of the overall story and worst: It is not responsible for the structure e.g. the gamma spectrum.
In 50 years actual SM papers will be a treasure for comedians...