This stuff is a lot easier to get wrong than it is to get right.
Jack have you had a look at those two spreadsheets? old 120W cal +xsh
Any obvious signs of error there?
This stuff is a lot easier to get wrong than it is to get right.
Jack have you had a look at those two spreadsheets? old 120W cal +xsh
Any obvious signs of error there?
I plan to do a video soon. I seek simple language. Below find a script. I invite comments. Thanks.
Hello. I'm Nicholas Cafarelli
Humankind when challenged finds solutions. Let's discuss one challenge and one solution.
The challenge: Carbon based fuel usage threatens our atmosphere.
Examples of hydrocarbons: coal, natural gas, oil, gasoline, diesel, and propane, to name a few.
When burned these fossil fuels always produce carbon dioxide.
Many of the world's scientists believe Carbon Dioxide, CO2, causes Global Warming.
If so, we have little time left to reverse the trend of more CO2.
Bill Gates, Robert Redford, and Brad Pitt, among many famous people, invest time, money, and thought into finding alternatives to Hydrocarbons.
We humans use energy mainly for heat. In our homes. In our factories. In making electricity.
What if we could make heat and electricity from simple inexpensive devices small enough to easily carry.
Doctor Tadahiko Mizuno believes he has such a device. A solution that can dramatically reduce our fuel use.
He wants people to copy his work. What do you need to do this:
Steel, nickel, palladium, deuterium, vacuum, and some heat from electricity.
You clean the parts. Assemble them. Remove the air inside. Heat the device a few times.
Repeat the air removal and heating cycle several times letting the device cool off.
Then you finally remove air again, replace it with deuterium gas, and heat it up to a higher temperature.
He has done this many times, being a scientist working on similar devices for over 30 years.
To make sure he has a valid method he asks that people copy his work reporting their results.
If the good Doctor is right, then devices costing under $100 could provide heat and electricity at low cost for years.
20 kilograms of steel, grams of nickel and palladium and deuterium gas make up the bulk of the device.
Some plumbing, some wiring, and some measuring devices, and nuts and bolts finish the parts list.
The cost to copy his work: a few hundred dollars if pennies are pinched.
You can spend more and get more precise results. Either way, his work needs immediate replication.
Help me do this, or do it yourself, or share this video with others who can or who will share it widely.
Thank you for listening. I wish you and yours the very best. Bye for now.
http://domizu.no and http://mizuno.ngo are both available for registration.
The same scientists would also likely have a consensus that Mizuno's device cannot work.
There is been googlable 'evidence' of consensus on GW...survey;s etc.
since it is now a hot topic.
Mizuno's device is not a hot topic
I'd keep consensus for GW
....see if XSH is increased by including Holmlid's UDD catalyst KFeO2, or there are ways of blocking muon/heavy electron fusion reactions using N2 or Neon gas. But first do the simple controls suggested by anonymous:
Two remarks:
- Since K doped FeO2 is not used by Mizuno, Pd coated Ni could be another catalyst to form D(0), maybe with a different efficiency. Holmlid mentioned Pd in earlier publications.
- Muons will not be absorbed by the reactor shell, they pass through. Relevant other types of particles will be released through annihilation which generate the heat in the reactor shell, see quotes below. This also may imply that D-D fusion will not occur on large scale within the R20 reactor (due to the low gas density in R20, Holmlid stated that for targeted D-D fusion gas pressure likely will require tens of Bars, so high gas density).
Here's a quote from the Norrønt Fusion Energy As website (with Holmlid as one of the shareholders):
"The technology uses a condensed form an ultra-dense state of the Hydrogen, with picometer bound distance. Ultra-dense hydrogen is disintegrated through annihilation to produce a controlled flux of high-energy particles for energy and electricity production. No harmful emission or hazards materials are generated from the process."
Another quote from Norrønt Fusion Energy As:
"The CHE generator is processing Hydrogen/Deuterium into ultra-dense hydrogen and through a proprietary annihilation like process produce clusters of high-energy particles. These particles are then converted through several stages for the energy to be extracted in form of heat, direct electric power or used in catalysed D-D fusion processes. "
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/tOsAAOSw9zdcuelm/s-l1600.jpg
I have a clone of this. 900 millimeters. Unknown alloy. If previously mentioned mass of steel is key to operation, this vessel might be disqualified.
90 millimeter top inner diameter, tapering inner diameter, 190 millimeter inner depth. Likely evacuated. Two wall construction.
This site claims 304 is a common alloy for such mugs.
Well. the second quote suggests muon-catalysed D-D fusion could occur wherever the D is located (Ni, Pd in stainless steel or in gas phase).
Well. the second quote suggests muon-catalysed D-D fusion could occur wherever the D is located (Ni, Pd in stainless steel or in gas phase).
Unluckily for this you would need negative muons. Holmlids proton excess mass adding method mostly produces +muons that cannot enter proton/deuterium orbits.
Sometimes posters should inform themselves before they start to think online...
Dr Richard and Wyttenbach
Would reducing reactor wall mass result in lower performance?
In your opinion.
Holmlids proton excess mass adding method mostly produces +muons.....
Various publications of Holmlid mention presence of negative muons.
E.g. this article.
I wonder if I can lay my hands on a used or discarded lecture bottle, and if I can clean/purge it, if Cambridge would charge it with Deuterium gas.
Alan Smith Are you electrolyzing the D2O like the Fusor people sometimes do?