But how about then the air temperature alone indicates 150 W excess, as shown in Fig. 6? That is even more compelling. That is before adjusting for the losses from the calorimeter box walls. THH and his handwaving cannot explain that.
Jed, I'm happy for anyone to criticise me. I'm not happy when you make this sort of rhetorical comment that shows you have either misread or ignored what I've posted in this thread many many times.
Read my lips:
The airflow errors cannot explain R20 Fig 6. However, this is a sample result with a new heater and I suggest a mistake that might not have been checked and could explain this. Mainly however I think it unfair to Mizuno (would be to any scientist) to rest too much credence on this very early pre-published result. It is very compelling, and if it stands there will no doubt soon be much more complete evidence validated by others and I will entirely agree this is extraordinary.