The R20 results are spectacular, but I'm making the whole of my statement conditional on them being real.
The R19 results are nearly as spectacular, but you pretend they do not exist. Results from 180 other labs are spectacular from a scientific point of view, but you pretend they do not exist. Or you pretend you have found reasons to doubt them. Your strategy is to take one set of results in isolation, find a bogus reason to doubt them, while you pretend that all other results do not exist. This is not science; it is trolling.