I further stated that the experiments of Mizuno as reported by yourself might be "subject to possible undisclosed details and systemic errors in the system". This is not a premise but rather a belief that the available information,
That is not a premise. It is your unfounded opinion. I do not think you can list any systematic errors in Mizuno's calorimeter, or in any any of the calorimeters now being used to try to replicate. If you could, I suppose you would. You are waving your arms and saying there must be an error. That does not prove anything. You have to say what error it is.
Also, what undisclosed details are there? Tell me, and I will disclose them.
I clearly limited my premise: that most of the reported replications use Mizuno-supplied reactor and/or meshes, and a calorimeter of his design. Is this premise right or wrong?
I have not heard that Mizuno supplied anyone with a calorimeter. He gave out some reactors. One of which was supposedly sent back.
I gather he helped the undergrads at the Hokkaido Science University. I don't know who did what or where the materials came from.
Anyway, if he did supply calorimeter, that is an observation, not a premise. As far as I know, most replications use air-flow calorimetry. I do not know how many meshes have been tested or how many reactors or meshes Mizuno has supplied, or who he gave them to. The fact that some replications use air flow calorimetry is no indication there is a systematic error with this method. The method has been widely used for over a century, so if it did not work, someone would have discovered that by now.