If you can set I of the power supply through a connection with the labjack then you can make a simple predictive control of the required
The HP/Agilent 6555A power supply has an analog input for voltage set point, but not for current. I was thinking to code it as a closed-loop servo, with the available power measurement from the Tek PA1000 as the control input. It would be a nice project but not in the LENR critical path.
The HP/Agilent 6555A power supply has an analog input for voltage set point, but not for current. I was thinking to code it as a closed-loop servo, with the available power measurement from the Tek PA1000 as the control input. It would be a nice project but not in the LENR critical path.
P = V2/R
Thus you can also make a predictive control by varying V
William Wollaston was a Platinum specialist, but he also tried to purify palladium, keeping all his processes secret. Did he succes ? Qui sait? He is also the inventor of the famous "A la Wollaston" electrode used by the experiments of Mizuno and his followers.
But he had many other interests, crystallography among others. He perfected the goniometer that René-Just Haüy had designed to measure the angles of the faces of a crystal. He published in the Philosophical Transactions in 1809 his conception of a reflective goniometer. He was therefore familiar with the works and ideas of Haüy. Moreover, he had taken a close interest in atomic theory, both criticizing and modifying the ideas of John Dalton.
Wollaston took as his starting point a remark by Robert Hooke in his Micrographia on the construction of geometric solids like the tetrahedron from spherical corpuscles. Wollaston hesitates: should we choose the tetrahedron or the octahedron as the basic module in crystallography?
This question is always relevant concerning the places where the deuterium is lodged in the alloys of palladium, isn' it? He showed how one ends up, by assembling spherical objects, at your choice, in a tetrahedron, an octahedron, a rhombohedron, a hexagonal prism, etc.
These reflections, which date from the Egyptians and Plato, should still guide us today.
Preparing a paper about the use of mysterious Roman Dodecaedrons. Any ideas about the use of these artefacts?
Here's a summary graph of the final run with load/unload cycling. No excess heat or radiation above background was seen.Anything else to try before I end the test?
Dear magicsound once again, i have to highlight your self sacrifice for so many years.
Now about the Mizuno way, so many lost themselves with this kind of guru, this is what i think.
Now Rossi ( or Parkhomov) could be also considered as gurus with his believers, followers or deep opponents.
However before the promotion of the powder use, Piantelli, Habel and Focardi all together already achieved a COP 2.
In this way, they only used std nickel std hydrogen.
Okay, we could use rather a mesh or a foam to increase the surface to first of all better see the potential xsh.
However the main things were the surface preparation.
So if you have one more look on their patent, you will se they used very professional methods for that.
in this way those previous proposed in this thread sounded in my mind as some kind of voices from the Jourdain valley.
The worst...More mind-boggling the words seem, more they are able to be heard with faith....
Here's a summary graph of the final run with load/unload cycling. No excess heat or radiation above background was seen.Anything else to try before I end the test?
Here's a summary graph of the final run with load/unload cycling. No excess heat or radiation above background was seen.Anything else to try before I end the test?
It might be the good opportunity to check out what happens after applying deeper (higher pressure and higher vacuum) and faster (quicker) load-unloading cycles with protium, which might be able to 'crack' the mesh more effectively. Protium should make it less of an issue to waste gas and from what has been previously reported it should show some excess heat anyway. I'm not sure what are me356's opinions on using both gases with the same mesh, though.
EDIT: I just realized me356 mentioned something very similar already:
magicsound You can increase flux by adding hydrogen as fast as possible with as high pressure as possible. This will create microcracks at the surface with the most transition metals and can also bypass oxide layer. With higher temperature material will allow faster loading.
You can do the pressure step then wait for some time then use vacuum then make another pressure step and so on. With each step there is higher chance for excess heat reaction.
You can use protium for this purpose to save Deuterium. Protium can be also loaded easier.
However before the promotion of the powder use, Piantelli, Habel and Focardi all together already achieved a COP 2.
In this way, they only used std nickel std hydrogen.
hello Cydonia. Can you point me to the data or experimental results which show this COP of 2? You don’t mention the absolute power nor the measurement uncertainty, but is such data available?
Yes agreed that MagicSound has always proceeded in a selfless way with maximum transparency. It’s sad to see the results fall on the negative side but at least three outside validators have gotten positive results from Mizuno’s methods.
More and better experiments are in the pipeline.
Things well knew..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJX7GVem3VY&t=238s&ab_channel=Focus
hello Cydonia. Can you point me to the data or experimental results which show this COP of 2? You don’t mention the absolute power nor the measurement uncertainty, but is such data available?
Yes agreed that MagicSound has always proceeded in a selfless way with maximum transparency. It’s sad to see the results fall on the negative side but at least three outside validators have gotten positive results from Mizuno’s methods.
More and better experiments are in the pipeline.
check out what happens after applying deeper (higher pressure and higher vacuum) and faster (quicker) load-unloading cycles
OK, once more into the void and back (still with Deuterium)
OK, once more into the void and back (still with Deuterium)
Thanks for your efforts. It might be worth also trying out loading/unloading cycles with protium as suggested, because its diffusion and solubility behavior in palladium is different than deuterium. I couldn't readily find a paper dedicated on this aspect, but this abstract mentions it: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.003
QuoteAn inverse isotope effect is observed for both the solubility and the diffusivity of hydrogen in palladium, i.e., the lightest isotope has the highest solubility and lowest diffusivity.
me356 because your argued so great results, the communauty is waiting for at least a similar report from your side.
I recommend to implement constant power [W] regulation. Then there will be no more power drops whatever you will do.
It might be worth also trying out loading/unloading cycles with protium as suggested, because its diffusion and solubility behavior in palladium is different than deuterium
To change to Protium I would have to move the regulator from the D bottle to the H bottle. I can do that but the mesh would have to be deeply unloaded, taking hours at high vacuum. For now I'll continue with the current setup. After a restart, the lab computer is now working, with 1180 Pa of D2 added. Same YT stream as above.
To change to Protium I would have to move the regulator from the D bottle to the H bottle. I can do that but the mesh would have to be deeply unloaded, taking hours at high vacuum.
I was mentally picturing just swapping the gas bottle, without deeply unloading the mesh from the previously loaded deuterium. In other words, the mesh/cell would end up containing both deuterium and protium.
This point hasn't been clarified yet by me356, but it did not appear crucial for the gas to remain monoisotopic.
magicsound also check out this loosely related procedure from a while back:
Display MoreMastromatteo determined a procedure by pure chance when he loaded a Pd plated nickel foam.
By asking him a lot of questions at last ICCF, I put forward this procedure that he had not seen.
He loads in H2 first, then he's waiting for pressure drop up to stabilization then unload by temperature both with pumping, then repeats these cycles up to 5X. The pressure always goes on and on faster with each cycle.
However, no excess at this stage.
After last H2 cycle pumped, now it loads with D2, pressure drop is much lower than in H2, He made also several cycles with D2 too.
After that when pressure didn't drop anymore, XH as well as neutrons appear.
Btw, as member from team that won European funding 2020, he will persevere in this direction, for sure.
The meshes in this test were already deeply saturated with H when received, as discussed some time ago. With the previous batch I saw up to 2k Pa come out when heat was applied. I'll continue to cycle with higher pressure (1k+ Pa) of deuterium.for now. Maybe change to the H bottle eventually.
Yes agreed that MagicSound has always proceeded in a selfless way with maximum transparency. It’s sad to see the results fall on the negative side but at least three outside validators have gotten positive results from Mizuno’s methods.
Daniel, please remind me who these 3 outside validators are. I'd like to pull together their results and post them here all in one place.
Mizuno’s experiment was replicated by two Japanese companies and Prof. Muto at Hokkaido Science University. Zhang saw some short lived XSH and also the group from India. In addition a large Japanese Electronics company has sent two engineers to Mizuno’s lab for nearly two months and the report was that they have confirmed positive results. Now we are planning more robust experiments with some well known and highly credible labs with different calorimetric methods which hopefully will become very strong evidence of mainstream publication quality. I am pretty sure Jed has all the original reports at his library.
Here's the graph of yesterday's run with cycling at higher pressure. Nothing unexpected was seen.
Here's the graph of yesterday's run with cycling at higher pressure. Nothing unexpected was seen.
Will you be making your digital files of this run available?
@Bruce_H The data files for MR6-45 are available at https://tinyurl.com/yt65shxh
