BTW Why the thread named "Celani discovery of High Temp Superconductor rejected" disappeared from here - a censorship?
Or just plain inability to keep the temporal continuity of forum?
BTW Why the thread named "Celani discovery of High Temp Superconductor rejected" disappeared from here - a censorship?
Or just plain inability to keep the temporal continuity of forum?
BTW Why the thread named "Celani discovery of High Temp Superconductor rejected" disappeared from here - a censorship?
Or just plain inability to keep the temporal continuity of forum?
It must be conspiratorial deep state censorship, just like the breakthrough in magnetic motors and alien body cavity exploration propensities are being supressed by the mainstream LENR bullies like Mizuno and Hagelstein and Mills.
Or conspiracy paranoia.
Pseudoscience relies heavily on anachronistic thinking.
Pseudoscience appeals to false authority, to emotion, sentiment, or distrust of established fact.
Pseudoscience relies heavily on subjective validation.
Who believes in conspiracies? New research offers a theory
https://www.sciencedaily.com/r…/2018/09/180925075108.htm
"Some people are also habitual conspiracists who entertain a variety of generic theories. For example, they believe that world politics are controlled by a cabal instead of governments or that scientists systematically deceive the public. This indicates that personality or other individual differences might be at play."
Pseudoscience relies heavily on anachronistic thinking.
History is written by the winner (Churchil)! The same holds for pseudo science. We do not yet know the winner!
I did write about facts I encountered if others have no experience, it is dirt cheap to say somebody thinks like a conspiracy would be on the way.
In fact such comments tell more about the commenters personal thinking than about what others think...This is called the mirror effect.
As C. Furey shows: All the known models to reason about physics are convertible they are well suited to reproduce the SM knowledge and as a corollary they are all unable to reproduce the numerical reality beyond what we know. First additional logic needs to be introduced!
BTW Why the thread named "Celani discovery of High Temp Superconductor rejected" disappeared from here - a censorship?
Or just plain inability to keep the temporal continuity of forum?
Do you think we are crazy! We don't censor LENR big names. Bad for business, and our reputations. Not sure where that thread went, or if it even existed. I did do some tidying up a few months back, and put whatever Italian I could find here Italian Contribution to LENR
Might want to look there.
QuoteIt must be conspiratorial deep state censorship, just like the breakthrough in magnetic motors
Deep state or not - but discussion about magnetic motors is actually censored even here, on this contrarian forum. This example just shows how pluralistic ignorance actually work - it's merely collective or intersubjective autocensorship rather than centrally organized one: but it doesn't make it less effective - on the contrary.
QuoteOr conspiracy paranoia.
I already faced many cases of accusation of conspiracy paranoia - but never accusation from pluralistic ignorance paranoia. Maybe it's time to finally start with it
QuoteNot sure where that thread went, or if it even existed.
It just says a lot about maintenance and moderation of the forum, where whole threads disappear without trace. Which is also why I proposed another more down to Earth explanation.
Well Zephir you can find these unquestioning, pseudoscientific, conspiracy topics are fair game and cannot be disputed without complete censorship on ECW. But then you have to read the nonsensical posts from people who are not mentally equipped or are in various stages of paranoia or schizophrenia, such that weeding through the nonsense is painful. That is why I prefer here. I might not understand everything but I have a reasonable belief that almost all the opinions here seem to have some merit and warrant thought, even if they are different than mine.
where whole threads disappear without trace.
I seem to have lost this thread somewhere..
perhaps it is in hyperspace.?
I'm not sure it ever existed with that title. I can find zero trace using any of the normal tags as search tools.
This would seem to have been the source of the story though.
OK, back to subject: the Amazon book is paywalled, but these studies aren't
Maxwell's Equations and Occam's Razor:
In this paper a straightforward application of Occam's razor principle to Maxwell's equation shows that only one entity, the electromagnetic four-potential, is at the origin of a plurality of concepts and entities in physics. The application of the so called "Lorenz gauge" in Maxwell's equations denies the status of real physical entity to a scalar field that has a gradient in space-time with clear physical meaning: the four-current density field. The mathematical formalism of space-time Clifford algebra is introduced and then used to encode Maxwell's equations starting only from the electromagnetic four-potential. This approach suggests a particular Zitterbewegung (ZBW) model for charged elementary particles.
Electron Structure, Ultra-dense Hydrogen and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
In this paper, a simple Zitterbewegung electron model, proposed in a previous work, is presented from a different perspective that does not require advanced mathematical concepts. A geometric-electromagnetic interpretation of mass, relativistic mass, De Broglie wavelength, Proca, Klein-Gordon and Aharonov-Bohm equations in agreement with the model is proposed. Starting from the key concept of mass-frequency equivalence a non-relativistic interpretation of the 3.7 keV deep hydrogen level found by J. Naudts is presented. According to this perspective, ultra-dense hydrogen can be conceived as a coherent chain of bosonic electrons with protons or deuterons at center of their Zitterbewegung orbits. The paper ends with some examples of the possible role of ultra-dense hydrogen in some aneutronic low energy nuclear reactions
Vector potential has no physical meaning, It's just a mathematical tool. It's clear written in all text-books!
Scalar waves are an old, well-known pseudoscientific argument. See the page on rationalwiki.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_wave
"A scalar wave is a purported type of electromagnetic wave that works outside physics as we know it.
The central conceit is that scalar waves restore certain useful aspects of Maxwell's equations "discarded" in the 19th century by those fools Heaviside, Hertz and Gibbs.[1] Nikola Tesla was also interested in them, in his more-than-a-little-odd period.
Free energy advocates have pushed the concept since the 1990s,[2] particularly Thomas E. Bearden. It has since been adopted by some alternative medicine practitioners as the new "quantum": a universally-applicable sciencey handwave to support any arbitrary claim whatsoever.[3] Conspiracy theorists hold that it is behind weather-changing superweapons that brought down space shuttle Columbia."
Vector potential has no physical meaning, It's just a mathematical tool. It's clear written in all text-books!
Many mathematical concepts in physics have no direct meaning. But if you can describe the coupling of an abstract (e.g. scalar) field with a real quantity, suddenly some meaning occurs.
Physics very often uses so called "massless particles" what is absolute nonsense if the e=mc^{2} relation should hold. Even worse people talk of negative energy instead of energy holes.
Thus scalar waves are composed of folded real waves that at the end look (couple) like scalar waves...
suddenly some meaning occurs?
like this one ?
"drinkable sunscreen" http://www.bad.org.uk/for-the-public/skin-cancer/drinkable-sunscreen
"Johnson also claims that over the seven years he has been selling ‘waters imprinted with scalar waves’ he has seen a 90% success in each treatment category. Again he provides no evidence for this claim. In the next paragraph, he assures us that he would ‘never sell or promote a Harmonized Water formula that wasn’t universally successful’. Again, there is no evidence for this ‘universal success’ (and his reported ‘90% success in each treatment category’ does not constitute universal success anyway).
With regards to the statement ‘I do believe that the skin is comprised of scalar waves’, we would like to confirm that this is not the case. More information about the structure of the skin is widely available, including on our website: http://www.bad.org.uk."
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Scalar_wave
"Richard C. Hoagland thinks Col. Bearden is dead right. So much so that he has adopted Bearden's view and given it a different name, "hyperdimensional physics." According to him, the vectorization of Maxwell's quaternions eliminated a whole dimension from which energy magically appears. Hoagland is so mathematically challenged that it's doubtful if he even understands what a quaternion is, let alone knows how to use one in a calculation. Certainly in all he has written and said about HD physics[9] he has never cited a single one of the quaternions."
"Johnson also claims that over the seven years he has been selling ‘waters imprinted with scalar waves’ he has seen a 90% success in each treatment category.
There is ample research concerning structured water. Depending on the method and frequencies used such structures can survive for hours or even longer. Such behavior is expected as the real Hydrogen (H2O) bond is somewhat different from what we learned in physics and is able to undergo complex magnetic bindings. All this has been proven by well known labs.
But the main problem is selling something "strange" as valuable without any verification.
"A mistaken application of the so called "Lorenz gauge" in Maxwell's equations denies the status of real physical entity to a scalar fIeld that, although not directly observable, has a gradient in space-time with clear physical meaning: the microscopic four-current density field"
The above considerations are similar to one of the main point of Reed paper:
"As can be clearly seen, application of the Lorenz gauge, where C = 0, totally denies the status of real
physical entity to the scalar field. However, it is this new idea of the independence of the potentials in
this gauge-free electrodynamics out of which the scalar value C is derived, and from which the unique
properties and dynamics of the scalar-longitudinal electrodynamic wave arises."
A mistaken application of the so called "Lorenz gauge" in Maxwell's equations ...
People interested in real deep math for the S^{3} - close to SO(4) - Maxwell math should have a look read into :
https://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI3125886/
Robert Jason Parsley , THE BIOT-SAVART OPERATOR AND ELECTRODYNAMICS ON BOUNDED SUBDOMAINS OF THE THREE-SPHERE, DISSERTATION University of Pennsylvania, 2004
Classic EM fields only work in open space not in closed dense space!
This book has an interesting approach. If you consider E=mc^2 than that is close to a curled up charge that moves at the speed of light and this property that fundamental charge densities should move at the speed of light is something of a clue. Now from the published paper the approach is to rewrite Maxwells equation to handle only a restriction of solutions of conserved charge that move at the speed of light. So it is not the same as Maxwell's equation. And to formulate this they tried to use as much symmetry and simplicity as possible. Now the book claims they can reproduce QED as a direct consequence of this restricted EM theory and that in itself is really interesting actually it's fantastic news if it is true. The question is where the SO(4) logic lies but to note is that we do have 4 complex dimensions here and that periodic solutions usually is seen as solutions on S^1 so indeed we might be able to find SO(4) in this structure.