Is Hagelstein's work fringe science or not fringe science?
in #38 above I answer this very precisely.
RB: my suggestion when you don't understand one of my posts is to indicate that and I will always clarify. However asking disingenuous "When did you stop beating your wife" questions is not actually helpful. Is it a rhetorical device, or does it indicate genuine confusion?
Also, may I suggest that you do not, even as a rhetorical device, confuse casual readers as in #39. There you juxtapose two sentences quoted from me starting with "It" and contradicting each other.
But, as I explained in #38 - and would be obvious to your audience if you had not omitted most of the post in your summary - the two "its" represent different areas in which Hagelstein has published.
The one relevant here, where he has been working on LENR theory, and one where he is investigating in detail some interesting details about the ME.
I am certainly grateful to you for reading what I write and allowing me to make corrections when (as I state above in #38) I mistake you here referencing Hagelstein's fascinating LENR theory work from his equally fascinating ME effect work. The two are very different. Perhaps you could be a little more patient with me, in order not to confuse your readers, and actually read my replies in full before commenting on them?