Ponderations on Cavitation

  • ICCF21 video of Stringham replication by Claytor:



    Thanks for that video Shane D. , I had not seen it until today. I also found a mention about a replication done by the MFMP of Stringham's work.


    I think transmutation is relatively easier to prove than excess heat. If one focuses in proving transmutation, and finds a way to consistently repeat results, this should put an end to the labelling of LENR as pseudoscience.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • I think transmutation is relatively easier to prove than excess heat. If one focuses in proving transmutation, and finds a way to consistently repeat results, this should put an end to the labelling of LENR as pseudoscience.


    Srinivasan got the government of India back into the LENR game 3-4 years ago. An article in the India Times after that, reported about it and claimed they had conclusively proved transmutations. If you do a search here, which is not easy, you can find it.

  • Srinivasan got the government of India back into the LENR game 3-4 years ago. An article in the India Times after that, reported about it and claimed they had conclusively proved transmutations. If you do a search here, which is not easy, you can find it.

    Thanks for that hint Shane!

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • I think transmutation is relatively easier to prove than excess heat. If one focuses in proving transmutation, and finds a way to consistently repeat results, this should put an end to the labelling of LENR as pseudoscience.



    About proving, my analysis is that whatever you chose, either by excess heat, or by transmutation (tritium, He4/heat correlation), it has been proven since long, and it has not convinced the eternal opponents.

    They say it is unspecified calorimetry artifact, or unspecified contamination or concentration...

    Even the tea kettle at NIWeek did not convince the physicists.

    Don't try to convince the physicist and APS with evidence, they cannot be. (only a theory can).


    You have to convince someone else.

    The position of Jean-François Geneste was that you could convince the engineers with a self-sufficient heat engine. It is very hard.


  • I agree wholeheartedly with your general assessment, but in the case of something that can be replicated rather easily and straight forward by anyone with a chemical analysis lab, the denial becomes self defeating quickly. Finding simple and straight forward experiments with unambiguous results that can be replicated by many is what I am looking for now.


    In this Chinese work there’s no obvious pitfall and elemental analysis by ICP MS is widespread. I have access to all what is necessary. I have been looking for a simple protocol involving cavitation but this Chinese paper can’t be any simpler. I will keep studying but this one can be done rather quickly, and After a positive results perhaps a repeat with a pinch of D2O would be in order.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.