The church of SM physics

  • those befuddled by the word chemistry describing LENR results.

    Theory-only paper..

    IF theory only .. there should be close comparison with known parameters at least

    or firm predictions..

    but not in this paper.

    there ae quite a few papers lke this on vixra.. .vague prediction/comparison..


    "the experimental search of the predicted phenomenon should be probably performed with plasmas or using a source
    of low-energy protons.

    The energy release in the course of proton trapping might be accompanied by Auger-processes
    and X-ray emission"

  • SM physics rethink: from topdown unification to suggestive bottomup phenomenology..


    It is impossible to recondition trained monkeys to become openly thinking humans again ...


    These folks will even deny the existence of a muffin they just eat if it would contradict the their mind set.


    If you once do understand SO(4) physics then the outraging nonsense inherent to current models will jump in your eyes. On a surface of a 3-sphere you cannot - never - find any higher symmetry. But such idiotism are perfect claims to draw an infinite amount of taxpayers money.

  • It is impossible to recondition trained monkeys to become openly thinking humans again ...


    These folks will even deny the existence of a muffin they just eat if it would contradict the their mind set.


    If you once do understand SO(4) physics then the outraging nonsense inherent to current models will jump in your eyes. On a surface of a 3-sphere you cannot - never - find any higher symmetry. But such idiotism are perfect claims to draw an infinite amount of taxpayers money.

    It's counterproductive to your hope or mission to constantly say people can't change or won't listen to your ideas. If you believe it, it resonates with your intuition, you've done the math and farely compared the alternatives, positively stand by it. Just because there maybe a clergy of inflexible minds doesn't write of the other 7 billion in humanity. There are ways to explain the results without invoking immaterial overunity, or contrived shortcuts to avoid the unexpected, perhaps more people than you think will study a whole new approache/category.

  • It's counterproductive to your hope or mission to constantly say people can't change or won't listen to your ideas.


    I have no mission! I just reposted what other said 80 years ago about new physics. Live will only change when the profiteers die out and the children have to gorw up.


    Or lets hope we see some success in LENR soon!