perhaps you'd like to be more precise which resonances you feel make your point?

Short memory is prerequisite to follow SM: CERN found two Higgs masses both with same significance now they hide one ...

SM:QED/QFT/QCD -for dense Matter is fringe science not in any way related to classic physics and has no power to explain even the simpelst things we like to know e.g. how to calculate the energy of the first gamma line of 6-Li.

One more try to explain it to undergraduates

Historically the system of constants(h,c,m_{p},m_{e},alpha,e) used in nuclear physics has been defined upon the magnetic mass (from exactly measured electron mass --> *μ*B) of the electron and it's relation to the proton mass given by charge. The above formula is just a variation of the known quantities, known since about 100 years...

This formula shows that, what we call mass or "real" -, massive particles have as a basis a 4D magnetic coupling. *μ*B is the Bohr magneton = magnetic moment of the electron corrected by the electron g-factor. The same formula also holds for the proton.

In classic 3D,t space and in all variations of spaces used by QFT etc. such a coupling in 3D,t space results in asymmetry or friction (stress) as the two ring currents that are the basis of the *μ*B must share one dimension. But particle like atoms do not show time like behavior what is the basic underlying mechanism of QFT and the origin of stress.

The mathematical space used by SM (QED etc.) SO(3)XSU(2)xU(1) has the wrong symmetry and thus the most time when reading an SM paper/ you read symmetry breaking it is just only a consequence of inadequate mathematical modeling.

SO(4) is the first & lowest symmetry group that is able to describe a frictionless coupling of two attractive ( by induced virtual charge) magnetic masses.

This results in the conclusion that SM is incomplete as it misses the (time free!) magneto-static solution of the EM fields.

The consequences of this are huge as almost all models for dense mass including GR must be reworked to fit the true nature of physics.

But as SO(4) physics shows: You gain everything you wanted to have the last 100 years including the exact derivation of gravitation and the unification of all forces. Finally we can now calculate nuclear properties what SM obviously - because of wrong math - cannot do.