Quote from Curbina

gio06 , you are probably familiar with the DTS idea of Cardone and the late Mignani, they sustain the Minkowski Spacetime is anisotropic, or can be made anisotropic by way of energy. I just mention it because you are using it as starting point.

I

Any anisotropy in Minkowsi spacetime implies that the Vacuum is structured as experimentally confirmed by the Aharonov-Bohm effect. A four-vector field [electromagnetic four potential] can be used to represent the structure of the Vacuum.

Aharonov-bohm effect as the basis of electromagnetic energy inherent in the vacuum - Foundations of Physics Letters

The Aharonov-Bohm effect shows that the vacuum is structured, and that there can exist a finite vector potentialA in the vacuum when the electric field…

link.springer.com

Something is wrong in the state of QED

O. Consa

"Quantum electrodynamics (QED) is considered the most accurate theory in the history of science. However, this precision is based on a single experimental value: the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron (g-factor). An examination of the history of QED reveals that this value was obtained in a very suspicious way. These suspicions include the case of Karplus & Kroll, who admitted to having lied in their presentation of the most relevant calculation in the history of QED. As we will demonstrate in this paper, the Karplus & Kroll affair was not an isolated case, but one in a long series of errors, suspicious coincidences, mathematical inconsistencies and renormalized infinities swept under the rug."

Quote from Wyttenbach

the most broad/deep cheating attempt ever made by the SM church.

the proposed new Neanderthal nutcracker in Geneva is more expensive.than anything from

the QED/QCD historical blunder so far

Here Sabine get's angry...in a controlled way..

"

All these predictions from particle physicists were wrong.

There is no shame in being wrong.

Being wrong is essential for science.

But what is shameful is that none of these people ever told us

what they learned from being wrong.

They did not revise their methods for making predictions for new particles.

They still use the same methods that have not worked for decades.

Neither did they do anything about the evident group-think in their community.

But they still want more money.

The tragedy is

I actually like most of these particle physicists.

They are smart and enthusiastic about science and for the most part

they’re really nice people.

But look, they refuse to learn from evidence. And someone has to point it out:

The evidence clearly says their methods are not working.

Particle physicists, of course, are entirely ignoring my criticism and

instead call me “anti-science”.

Let that sink in for a moment. They call me “anti-science”

because I say we should think about where to best invest science funding,

.. if you do a risk-benefit assessment it is clear that building a bigger collider

is not currently a good investment. It is both high risk and low benefit.

We would be better off if we'd instead invest in the foundations of quantum mechanics and astroparticle physics.

They call me “anti-science” because I ask scientists to think.

You can’t make up this shit.

Frankly, the way that particle physicists behave makes me feel

embarrassed I ever had anything to do with their field.."

RobertBryant , I think you would agree that this text could apply to a certain extent to the field of Hot Fusion. Specially the "We need more money!" part.

Quote from Curbina

the field of Hot Fusion.

Hot fusion by collision is the Neanderthal nutcracker suite

BGM for the SM church..plenty of $ during the offering time but utter silence in results

Here is Unzicker,, it appears that the church is under concerted attack in Germany

a new Reformation..?????

There are a lot of heretics around

1 comment

"As an undergraduate in the late 1980s I remember being asked to accept without argument

the findings of a HEP graph where the error bars were bigger than the axies, talk about a noise in data!

High Energy Physics lost all glamour for me then and I pursued interests in Solid State instead...

Thanks for all you do."

My take on a loop hole regarding Aspects experiment,

discussion

Without being a physicist, see a video of a car crash at 100 km/H on youtube, then 200 and you will verify this postulate. The Germanwings crash was impressive in this way because no big part had been seen on pictures. Also, that's why I keep thinking that particle physics has no basis. Depending on a given input energy, we won't find a new particle but an energetic "expression" and that's it.

If only they were just crashing rocks..

but the new COLLIDER

will cost $23 billion !

(but won't happen thanks to Vlad's brainsnap..)

Sabine..

" there are entirely different types of experiments that could lead to breakthroughs at far smaller costs, such as high precision measurements at low energies or increasing the masses of objects in quantum states. Going to higher energies is not the only way to make progress in the foundations of physics; it’s just the most expensive one.

The World Doesn’t Need a New Gigantic Particle Collider

It would cost many billions of dollars, the potential rewards are unclear—and the money could be better spent researching threats such as climate change…

www.scientificamerican.com

Good article on the many faces of the proton. Suitable for the layperson:

Inside the Proton, the ‘Most Complicated Thing’ Imaginable | Quanta Magazine

The Layperson.

Visualizing the Proton.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Total nonsense written by followers of a death cult (standard model)::

The proton is a quantum mechanical object that exists as a haze of probabilities until an experiment forces it to take a concrete form.

This is brain fart logic as nobody ever did prove this. It is a fake assumption made by people that never learnt basic physics. Nothing is more real than a proton. Just ask a chemist...

But but but.... It looks so kewl those animantions (!), gotta be real then.. riiight