The church of SM physics

  • This is an interesting paper from Edward Teller. 50 years old now, in this paper he has a lot to say about electrets, electromagnetism, and gravity.

    According to Edward Teller, rotation causes electric polarization of solids, and according to Siparov (anisotropic geometrodynamics), rotation on astronomical scales causes an additional force (an addition to Newton's law), which eliminates the need for dark matter and dark energy. Thus, according to Siparov, rotation also acts on gravity. Let me remind you that, according to my assumptions, rotation also acts on LENR.

  • Cherepanov2020


    So show us. You never actually show us anything new arising from your theory or views. I still want to know how you explain the 'Hall Effect', which has proven so important is studying semiconductor properties.


    In studying precession of the electron in the hydrogen atom one needs to introduce directions for the magnetic moments and operating forces. It's this need to be specific that is at issue here, not the relative distances.


    I see you don't know the size of the electron either. That is one of the things that vexes me, so I prefer to let the electron be deformable (can be compressed).


    Concerning the model for the neutron: Note that it is very hard to make one (takes the pressures from the collapse of the core of a star), but is easy to get rid of (just let it alone for awhile). As I see it, the decay of a neutron comes about because of the distortion of the magnetic fields (like in the model I suggested). The instability that leads to decay is built in.

  • Here is a video from "see the pattern" about QED and some historical perspective....

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • Edo


    I presume you are referring to an emission of a positron. There seems to be some argument as to whether the positron is somehow contained in the nucleus or is created as part of the emission. I tend toward the latter point of view. But an electron is also created in that case. I take the view that charge is always being created and destroyed spontaneously at the level of the quantum foam, but always in a way to keep the net change in charge equal to zero. Considering that an isolated magnetic pole has never being found I think that point of view would be consistent with Wyttenbach's theory, as even the higher order magnetic fields must have two poles.


    In any case, the creation of the extra electron would give the illusion of the creation of a neutron.


    In the case of decay of thorium to lead six alpha particles are emitted. So twelve electrons must also be emitted. The emission of a positron would require an extra electron to be emitted. Can you track that process? Can anyone? There is a project for you. Or find another process that is easier to track to prove that a fission process can produce a neutron.

  • Anomaly in proton structure.. not predicted by quarks,,

    https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11461

    " This striking contradiction to the theoretical predictions suggests that scientific understanding of the strong interaction that binds the proton’s elementary quark and gluon constituents together may be missing a key dynamical element.

    This presents a significant challenge to the prevalent theory."

    Decoding the Proton’s Response to an External Electromagnetic Field
    New measurements show the proton’s electromagnetic structure deviates from theoretical predictions.
    www.energy.gov


  • Dear Robert, could it help the hydrino theory ?

  • Специально для Вас я снял 5 частей своих видео -

    Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 1 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0Z6-LPcMdg


    Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sXhUMIGE3k


    Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 3 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz1YRSvoo4s


    Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 4 — https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v = ORqpdpTSbj 4


    Термодинамика произошла Бройля в современных представлениях, Иванов М.Я. , 31.03.2016 ч. 5 - https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v = ihkpINFIw - k


    Доклад Авшарова Е.М. -

    «Законы ведут и классическая Игровая эксперимент XXI, теория и практика», 15 февраля 2022 года - https :// www . ютуб . ком / смотреть ? v =VbAKlOOabTs

  • unidentified hydrinos (UHOs)

    rather than any "hydrino"

    my favorite monster in the SM bedtime story is the "antibottom"

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


  • A synonym for bottom-quark is beauty quark, so anti-bottom should be renamed as ugliness or inelegance quark!

    I guess most of particle physicist are completely drunk! How else could one claim that something with mass > 938MeV can exist inside the proton or be a part of the proton structure? We all know that 52 MeV are enough to crack a proton into 2 Kaon's. So claiming forces/potentials inside a proton in the range of several GeV is definitely covered by Dürenmatt's stage play "the physicists".


    = Total metal disturbance....

  • Today I added a new paper to research_gate https://www.researchgate.net/p…67405461_Basics_of_fields


    Physics journals do not like news that refute century old claims and contradict standard books of physics like Jackson.

    Basic finding:: There are no real 1/r fields. Thus all physics (QM/QED, etc.) that uses this simplification is toy physics for the child yard. Also the Gauss flux law does not hold for a homogeneous surface charge as Jackson claims. This has huge implications.

  • Today I added a new paper to research_gate https://www.researchgate.net/p…67405461_Basics_of_fields


    Physics journals do not like news that refute century old claims and contradict standard books of physics like Jackson.

    Basic finding:: There are no real 1/r fields. Thus all physics (QM/QED, etc.) that uses this simplification is toy physics for the child yard. Also the Gauss flux law does not hold for a homogeneous surface charge as Jackson claims. This has huge implications.

    Thank you for this paper. For once, I could understand it at first reading.I'm still struggling to understand your SO4.

  • I'm still struggling to understand your SO4.

    The same happened to to GR - general relativity. Not even Einstein did understand it. GR is pure math and as such highly important. For physics it has zero relevance despite a never ending flow of people that claim other wise.

    Fields have sources. Fields can only be detected by forces. Forces have an origin not so in GR...

  • The speed of light "c" is no limit in cosmological dimensions. What simpel minded physicists ignore is that general relativity (GR) only works in a so called closed system. The universe is an open system as we have no mean to define a boarder etc...


    Most cosmological papers based of GR are just educated nonsense.

  • How the newest taxpayer funded collider and the superhero Higgs boson

    will save humanity...

    or not..

    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Want To Advertise or Sponsor Us?
CLICK HERE to contact us.