hi
i found this on my email
i m not sure if it has been already posted
https://www.academia.edu/29966…mail_work_card=view-paper
Opinions?
hi
i found this on my email
i m not sure if it has been already posted
https://www.academia.edu/29966…mail_work_card=view-paper
Opinions?
Thanks for that- here's a more accessible version...
Abstract
The low energy nuclear transmutation reactions were investigated within a
compact flourescent lamp (CFL), which was irradiated by intense
microwave energy. A modified microwave owen operated as a source of
intense electromagnetic field. Solids like glasses or CFLs absorbed
efficiently microwave energy (E+H field both) resulting arcing, ionization
and plasma state. We observed and measured possible elemental
transmutation of the P to Si and S in CFL-s during intense microwave (MW)
irradiation. Since this phenomenon seems to be very complex, therefore it
requires multidisciplinary approaches.
MicrowaveInducedElementalTransmutationinCompactFlourescentLamps.pdf
I do not know why people publish papers with claimed elemental composition before experiment that sums up to 30% instead of 100%..
Until this is fixed the paper is just rubbish.
It's difficult to take seriously anyone who can't be bothered to spell "fluorescent" correctly
It's difficult to take seriously anyone who can't be bothered to spell "fluorescent" correctly
Certainly not helping to build his case. Typos abound in this article, and I agree at least basic spell checking is a must when one wants to publish. That said, when one is not a native English speaker some typos are harder to detect.
But now, talking about the work itself, certainly trying to make much about the analysis of an initially very heterogeneous solid and finding some changes after such an input of energy is not really compelling.
Analyzing solid samples is a complex matter in and on itself, the author certainly needs to make a better protocol if he wants this to be taken seriously.