Dark matter’s shadowy effect on Earth: possible link of dark matter, LENR and global warming?

Dark matter’s shadowy effect on Earth: Earth’s periodic passage through the galaxy’s disk could initiate a series of events that ultimately lead to geological cataclysms and mass extinctions.’

In my dark matter based theory (I, II, III) the increasing frequency of close asteroid encounters should be also related to global warming episodes. Professor Michael Rampino, a biologist at New York University already presented a theory , that the dark matter disrupts the path of comets and asteroids, which would bombard the Earth, trigger geovolcanism and cause climatic changes.

The truth being said, available data of mass extinctions and volcanic period still support both theories only vaguely(1, 2), which is why scientists are still pushing these hypotheses in popular books instead of serious publications. But we have another indirect indicia of this theory, which is typical for emergent (i.e. hyperdimensional) scenarios: we can find many separated indicia - but none of it works too reliably by itself.

But the research of prof. Rampino is no way unsuccessful. Between others he proposed the presence of a massive impact crater in the Falklands in 1992 after he noticed similarities with the Chicxulub crater in Mexico—the asteroid that created this crater is thought to have played a major role in the extinction of the dinosaurs 66 million years ago. But after a brief report at the Falklands site, very little research was carried out. Now, a team of scientists—including Rampino—have returned to the area to perform an “exhaustive search for additional new geophysical information” that would indicate the presence of an impact crater about 150 km (93.21 miles) in diameter.

The basis of my theory are observations, that magnetic fields, scalar waves and neutrinos affect speed of nuclear reactions. Magnetic field is indeed too weak for being able to affect nuclear reactions directly, in scalar wave physics it can concentrate particles (scalar waves and neutrinos), which already have such an ability. You can imagine it like effect of wind to location of paratroopers landing: wind is too weak for being able to affect heavy person and parachute (to which such a person is attached) is too lightweight for to make significant impact. But connection of both bodies already enables the both. In dense aether model the neutrinos are surrounded by invisible scalar ("magnetic") charge, which has much larger scope than weak charge of neutrinos and interacts strongly with magnetic field. The magnetic field thus affects the propagation of neutrinos in similar way, like charge field affects path of electrons and pair of bucking magnets behaves like optical lens for them.

In dense aether model neutrinos are solitons of scalar waves in similar way, like photons are solitons of light waves. They don't interact very strongly with observable matter, but due to high density of nuclear matter the speed of their propagation gets greatly slowed down at the center of atoms. Here I presume, that neutrinos can get trapped by atom nuclei and they could bounce across it like standing waves, which they're also oscillate by itself (disappear and reappear periodically). When resonance condition of both periodic effects is met, the even subtle neutrino can affect nuclear reactions significantly, because it can bounce from inner surface of atom nuclei multiple-times.

In droplet model of atom nuclei nuclear reactions can be compared to coalescing of mercury droplets: their interaction requires temporal formation of thin neck with strong negative space-time curvature, which will initiate their merging (activation energy). And weak charge of neutrinos or neutrons serves here like tiny bubble of vacuum of strong negative space-time curvature. Another option is, the weak charge of neutrinos breaks CP symmetry of strong force and nonradiation condition of excited states, which usually prohibits in their interaction. The magnetic field thus doesn't affect speed of nuclear reactions directly, but it focuses neutrinos, which can already catalyze them.

Quote

Triggering LENR is quite an other story as LENR needs no triggering, it needs support to remove the excess energy

How did you get into it? It's like to say, that LENR doesn't run, until we cool the system - whereas most LENR systems enjoy heating.

Not everything is based or even it can be expressed by equations. For example theory of continental drift is not based on equations. Please note, that prof. Rampino also doesn't build his theory on equations: his theory is simply based on coincidence of period of solar system oscillations around galactic equator and extinction periods by meteoric impacts. I suspect, that adherence on equations delays understanding of hyperdimensional physical phenomena (like entanglement and/or collapse of wave function), which are very simple in principle/geometry, but difficult to grasp by formal model. We can go even further and demand that every theory should be based on logical model primarily rather than formal one. For example Big Bang theory is pretty nonsensical on logical level and it deliberately confuses intrinsic and extrinsic perspectives repeatedly (for example it considers space-time expansion despite it talks about expansion of matter inside it etc.). Even in math every theorem must be based on/proven with robust predicate logic before it can be used for subsequent derivations. So that by primary adherence of physics on predicate logic we would make physics more consistent with formal math, not less.

I even suspect, that scientists are delaying logical understanding of their research intentionally for to keep their jobs longer and for maintaining their intellectual superiority and informational monopoly over laymen like medieval shamans. At the case of global warming understanding this ignorant stance is undoubtedly backed also with interests of private companies and multinational monopolies, which profit from redistribution of public money for "fight" with global warming. These money are "easy" money, which don't undergo free market utilitarian scrutiny. Which is why we not only have no alternative models of global warming researched but even considered, as if these alternative explanations wouldn't exist at all. Being lead by occupational driven instinct the scientists did deliberately choose just the explanation of global warming which provides them most of grants and jobs from all other explanations possible .

The limited applicability of formal math for description of hyperdimensional phenomena can be also proven logically. The formal models of contemporary physics are self-consistent only until they're reductionist, i.e. based on schematic projection of hyperdimensional phenomena into low-dimensional space-time. The consistent formal description of hyperdimensional phenomena would be represented by non-compact manifold in low-dimensional parameter space and it would break into multiple mutually inconsistent formal models like projection of hypercube into 3D space. Please note that (unwilling) switching of observational perspectives during description of hyperdimensional objects is also most frequent culprit of their failure at predicate logic level.The fact we have formal description of reality fragmented into quantum mechanics and general relativity is also indicia of its intrinsic hyperdimensional nature. Therefore once some phenomena gets hyperdimensional, then its self-consistent formal description even CAN NOT be provided quite objectively - it's not fear or ignorance of math, which would be responsible for it. At the case of dark matter influence of global warming we are thus constrained to fragmented seemingly unrelated rare indicia rather than consistent and omnipresent evidence. It's important to have it on mind in further explanation of its physical motivation. The ignorance of these indicia on behalf of waiting for robust evidence should be therefore considered as an evasion and tendency to dismiss such a theory as a whole rather than responsibly minded attitude driven by precautionary principle. After all, the hyperdimensional nature of cold fusion isn't very different in this regard.

What makes the Earth's surface move? Do tectonic plates move because of motion in the Earth's mantle, or is the mantle driven by the movement of the plates?

In geothermal theory of global warming (I, II, III) the tectonic plate motion is apparently driven by mantle plumes (convective patterns of Earth mantle). Their shift is also what is responsible for undergoing fast shift of geomagnetic poles (the heating of Earth mantle is catalyzed by neutrinos in dark matter).

In dense aether model Weaire-Phelan_structure of these plumes is driven by dark matter distribution (which follows nested hypersphere packing geometry around stars and galaxies) too. See also:

• Dodecahedral Earth hypothesis or Russian geologists, who connected the mantle plumes with geological artifacts at the surface or Earth.
• Dodecahedral geometry observed from the Earth in large amplitude spectrum of CMBR
• Geometry of continents reflects the geometry of CMBR fluctuations, which would assign the terrestrial origin to CMBR observations.