https://www.google.com/amp/s/p…nce-anisotropy-cosmic.amp

Thanks, wouldn't consider myself for or against the electric universe but this article sure makes one think. Probably would prefer the broader term plasma cosmology. This plus dense hydrogen's (Mills/Holmid) effects on what we observe would explain a lot. Will watch skeptically!

Electric Universe Today, tomorrow, yesterday

As we today use a delay when reporting a live feed to share news story's we use the delay to remove any slip-ups to provide a clean review in the here and now from our presumptive pov

It's like we put one foot in today and one foot in tomorrow and we can only see the "residual" effects of tomorrows.

yesterday was a note worthy day for a Clock starting and saving all the slip-up's over reaching temper tantrums to slide them into a slot in the universe's hard drive to only be seen in a thousand years.

https://gizmodo.com/iss-sees-t…etic-pulse-int-1840342399

An interesting article hope they find irrefutable signs of energetic reactions. The wonders intertwined in atmospheric phenomina like lightning the energy in water should be apparent in many environmental phenomina.

Quote from Alan Smith

Nice article from New Scientist- experiment shows how electrical effects build planets from dust.

Electricity may be more important to making planets than we thought. We aren’t sure how tiny particles come together to build baby planets, but dropping glass beads from the top of a tall tower has shown that it may be with some help from static electricity.

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/a…ps-of-dust/#ixzz67vF2tFzi

A combination of many things flowing, recycling of energy and order are designed into the fabric, would you say entropy would only seem dominant on the scale of human existance..? To me there must have been a conscious deliberate architect involved over the vast ages. Life simpler than animals and plants may also be as common as planets and stars, springing up wherever the conditions exist.

Thunderbolts... gravity versus charge

Quote from Director

Here is my understanding of gravity according to a model of physics that accepts the scalar and vector potentials as having physical reality.

Gravity is an extreme gradient produced in the scalar potential which constitutes the superfluidic medium that permeates the universe. This gradient can be produced by producing an extreme geometric asymmetry (convergence or divergence) in this medium, an extreme non-linear time based change, some combination of previous two, or the introduction of physical matter. All of these instances will produce a gravitational effect due to the fact that gravity is simply nothing more than an imbalance in the "pressure" produced by the scalar potential. To conceptualize this, visualize floating under the surface of a flowing river of water. The pressure you feel all around you from the water is the scalar potential, and the flow or motion of the water is the vector potential. Now, imagine that you are floating in a universal medium of liquid - which you really are! Within this liquid, you experience a constant pressure from all directions that balance out to zero unless there is an imbalance of the scalar potential around you. For example, if there was a lower density ahead of you and a greater density behind you, which would give you a push forward. On the Earth's surface, since the bulk of the planet slightly absorbs a tiny fraction of the scalar potential and the vector potential (moving currents of scalar potential that penetrate everything), there is a greater pressure from above than from below so you are pushed downwards.

There's another way of producing a gravitational effect that doesn't require a huge mass. You can manipulate the vector and scalar potentials through modern technology. For example, if you were to produce a toroidal vortex of plasma (using a heavy isotope such as doubly ionized mercury 199 which would have zero quadrapolar moment to increase the spin polarization relaxation time and would also behave as a pseudo-noble gas), you could contain the magnetic field within the torus and produce an external bubble of magnetic vector potential. If you made the shape of this bubble asymmetrical and pulsed it sharply in a non-linear manner, you could create the equivalent of a "warp bubble" around the plasma ball (or macro-EVO) that would experience more pressure from the scalar potential in one direction than the other. If you put the plasma ball in the central column of a craft and allowed it to wrap around it, you would have a spaceship capable of propelling itself via the manipulation of apparent mass, inertia, and gravity - which are all really the same thing.

Kenneth Shoulders observed how EVOs were capable of picking up matter and then being accelerated to extremely high speeds for very little external energy input as if the vast bulk of their apparent mass, inertia, and gravity had been shed. I believe this technology of mimicking self organizing processes in nature such as vortexes and plasma balls has been utilized by the military industrial complex since the 1960's to produce highly advanced vehicles.

Display More

This is my theory on the formation of the planet Earth! https://www.google.kz/search?i…model%20of%20the%20planet