Elettrone: un nuovo modello. Video realizzato da Francesco Ferrara

A summary of the proposed Zitterbewegung model:

0) A gauge-less, simple interpretation of Maxwell's equations can be written, using Cl_3,1(ℝ) algebra, using only the electromagnetic four potential

1) Does exist a a scalar field that is the four divergence of the four electromagnetic potential

2) Charge density is the partial time derivative of the scalar field

3) Current density vector components are the partial space derivatives of the scalar field

4) D'Alembert equation can be applied to both scalar field and charge density

5) Electron mass is the angular frequency of a rotating elementary charge along a circumference which length is equal to Compton wavelength

6) Electron charge follows an helicoidal motion that can be encoded with a single spinor of Cl_3,1(ℝ).

7)The concept of relativistic mass is easily derived from the electron charge helicoidal motion.

8 ) The electron charge is distributed on the surface of a sphere that follows a circular or helicoidal motion.

9)The value of the elementary charge is equal (in natural units) to the square root of the radius of this sphere with the radius of the charge orbit

10) The electron spin 1/2 is the quantized component along an external magnetic field of electron angular momentum (=hbar)

11) The elementary charge e is always associated to a quantized magnetic flux Φ_M=h/e.

12) The electron charge has a pure electromagnetic momentum eA equal to its mass in natural units (p=eA=mc)

13) Newton law F=ma can be easily explained inside the theory framework

14) The charge moves at speed of light (a major difference with Mills theory)

15) Heisenberg uncertainty principle has a simple geometric interpretation

16) Ultradense hydrogen (and consequently AHE and LENR experiments) may be explained with the formations of pseudo-neutrons where the proton is at center of electron Zitterbewegung charge orbit

17) GEometric-Electromagnetic interpretation of Dirac, Proca and Klein-Gordon equations is proposed.

18) Aharonov-Bohm equations are in agreement with the proposed model

First publication was Occams razor followed by others of Kovac, Celani etc.. there is no new content.

The problem is that most of the calculations just show known facts and the model does not calculate any new things...

Quote from gio06

14) The charge moves at speed of light (a major difference with Mills theory)

Where is the force that bends the charge?? Or is it massless as it should be!

Quote from Wyttenbach

First publication was Occams razor followed by others of Kovac, Celani etc.. there is no new content.

The problem is that most of the calculations just show known facts and the model does not calculate any new things...

Where is the force that bends the charge?? Or is it massless as it should be!

Display More

The force comes from the charge self-interaction (Lorentz force) with its magnetic flux quantum Φ_M=h/e.

see also:

Quantum mechanics from self-interaction

eq. 36, par. 3.4 (The electromagnetic Dirac equation) of Electron Structure, Ultra-Dense Hydrogen and Low Energy Nuclear Reactions

Quote from can

If I understand correctly, in very simple terms, the rotating charge is massless and the electron mass comes from the circular motion of the charge.

The key equation that connects mechanics and electromagnetism is

p=eA=mc

The charge moves always at light-speed, has no intrinsic mass but has a mechanical momentum of purely electromagnetic nature.

There are not new concepts in the last post of Vessela blog. The aim is to present the divulgative video of Francesco Ferrara.

English version

http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com…lutionary-model-electron/

Quote from can

If I understand correctly, in very simple terms, the rotating charge is massless and the electron mass comes from the circular motion of the charge.

The origin of mass has been already explained by a Nobel laureate!

Is there anyone so crazy to think he know more than a Nobel laureate?

Quote from Curbina

Nobel Laureates, are not omniscient nor infalible, did you know?

https://www.realclearscience.c…isproved_discoveries.html

So You Wanna Be a Mad Scientist?

pseudoscienza?

"Il presidente della Repubblica, come un vero e proprio “Papa laico” in difesa del mondialismo filosofico-scientifico, afferma di situarsi: «in un’epoca nella quale emergono sconsiderati scetticismi, quando non inaccettabili opposizioni, ai risultati offerti dal metodo scientifico».E ancora, il 24 ottobre al Quirinale alla manifestazione “I giorni della ricerca” il presidente dichiara: «La rapida circolazione di informazioni paradossalmente può provocare nuove sacche di disinformazione o addirittura la diffusione di credenze anti-scientifiche, di paure irrazionali che vanno contrastate perché possono aprire pericolose falle in questo sforzo collettivo».

Sempre il 24 ottobre, a Bergamo, all’evento “Molte fedi sotto lo stesso cielo” e “Bergamo scienza” parla ai ragazzi, che avevano lamentato la proliferazione sui social network di fake news e pseudoscienze, e criticato anche la classe dirigente, la quale “a volte ignora dati scientifici”. Mattarella dichiara: «Siamo, talvolta, preda della malattia della “opinabilità”, che riduce i fatti ad opinioni, contro ogni evidenza». Egli, dunque, auspica che «nel confronto tra cultura scientifica e culture pseudoscientifiche, a prevalere sul pregiudizio e sul sospetto, talvolta fanatici, devono essere i risultati della ricerca sperimentale, indirizzati al bene delle persone»."

"The President of the Republic, as a true" secular Pope "in defense of philosophical-scientific globalism, claims to be situated:" in an age in which skepticism emerges, if not unacceptable opposition, to the results offered by the scientific method " . And again, on October 24th at the Quirinale at the event "The days of research" the president declares: "The rapid circulation of information paradoxically can provoke new pockets of disinformation or even the spread of anti-scientific beliefs, irrational fears that must be fought. because they can open dangerous leaks in this collective effort. "Also on 24 October, in Bergamo, at the event" Many faiths under the same sky "and" Bergamo science "speaks to the boys, who had complained about the proliferation of fake news on social networks and pseudosciences, and also criticized the ruling class, which "sometimes ignores scientific data". ara: "We are, sometimes, prey to the disease of" debatable ", which reduces the facts to opinions, against all evidence". He therefore hopes that "in the confrontation between scientific culture and pseudoscientific cultures, the results of experimental research aimed at the good of the people must prevail over prejudice and suspicion, sometimes fanatics".

5.1. Electron spin and coherent systems

"In the proposed model, the electron, in presence of an external magnetic field, is subjected to Larmor precession and its spin value ±ħ/2 is interpreted as the intrinsic angular momentum component parallel to the magnetic field."

The spin is just a quantum number not a component of the electron angular momentum.

In quantum mechanics does not exist such a thing as an "electron structure".

These guys ignore the very basic concepts of quantum mechanics!

"extrapolating this line (no resonances) to resting electron (γ=1), we get ≈100 mb, corresponding to ≈2 fm radius."

La follia

can

"It is interesting to note that a hypothetical technology, able to align the intrinsic angular momentum of a sufficient number of electrons, could favor the formation of a coherent superconducting and super-fluid condensate state. In this state, the electrons would behave as particles with whole spin ħ and would no longer be subject to the Fermi–Dirac statistic. The compression effect (pinch) of an electrical discharge, accurately localized in a very small “capillary” volume, inside which a very rapid and uniform variation of the electric potential occurs, could favor the formation of a superconducting plasma.The conjecture is based on the possibility that, as a consequence of Aharonov–Bohm effect, a rapid, collective and simultaneous variation of the Zitterbewegung phase catalyzes the creation of coherent systems "

From Feynman lectures:

"Thus many people were rather shocked when the matter was brought up. That’s why someone thought it would be worthwhile to do the experiment to see that it really was right, even though quantum mechanics, which had been believed for so many years, gave an unequivocal answer. It is interesting that something like this can be around for thirty years but, because of certain prejudices of what is and is not significant, continues to be ignored."