Dr Mobeen Syed chat.
Talks about Ivermectum and why
the Medical Profession got bogged
down with CV 19 treatments.
From 9 to 26 minute marks.
What would you want the FDA to do? Keep quiet and publish no negative opinion, even when their data shows the drug does not work?
I'd like the FDA or any government org.. to publish the full postiive data for the experimental Covid vaccines.. if available
for example the effectiveness of the vaccine in the octogenarian age group
When Jed says 'even when their data says the drug doesn't work
he is fudging ... which drug Jed??? ivermectin?? be specific please.. Remdesivir?
Again let me point out that the FDA cannot stop any doctor from the off-label use of drug. Any drug already approved for some other use can be used to treat COVID-19, whether it has been shown to be effective or not. So "allow" is the wrong word here. The FDA can only discourage the use of a drug that its experts judge does not work. What would you want the FDA to do? Keep quiet and publish no negative opinion, even when their data shows the drug does not work?
A group of doctors from the FLCCC begged congress for the right to use what they call the I Mask+ Protocol, been in all the papers and posted here multiple times, so why if what you say is true are these doctors asking for permission? I think we live in different worlds
Display MoreI'd like the FDA or any government org.. to publish the full postiive data for the experimental Covid vaccines.. if available
for example the effectiveness of the vaccine in the octogenarian age group
When Jed says 'even when their data says the drug doesn't work
he is fudging ... which drug Jed??? ivermectin?? be specific please.. Remdesivir?
Robert,
Do you consider these new Covid-19 drugs “vaccines”?
They don’t immunize anyone, and once “immunized”, you can still get and transmit this virus.
I don’t know, appears to be more like a band-aid than a vaccine, no?
Seems to me this is more like Theraflu in that it can severely lessen the effects of the virus and greatly reduce the probability of ending up in the hospital and dying.
Both good reasons to be sure, but a vaccine?
Thanks Rends
Here is a transcript for those who prefer text rahter than audio
Perhaps Ivermectin will be OK for those in the poor countries
orr those in the the rich countries who selfinfect with scabies..
and the vaciine will be a pricey wing and a prayer for the rich countries
this is a letter for Mr Johnson
‘Dear prime minister my name is dr tess laurie and i'm the director of the
evidence-based medicine consultancy in Bath {U.K}
my business conducts industryindependent medical evidence synthesis
to support international clinical practice guidelines
my biggest clients are the NHS and the WHO
i have recently authored a report called
ivermectin for preventing and treating covid19
a rapid review to validate the frontline Covid 19 critical care alliance's conclusions
in connection with its findings i sent an urgent correspondence to mr hancock
and other members of parliament on
monday the 3rd of january
unfortunately i have not yet had a reply
and due to the urgent implications of the report i'm trying to reach you via this video
the good news is that we now have solidevidence of an effective treatment for Covid 19
it is called ivemecttin
ivermectin is a very safe and effective anti-parasitic medication
widely used in low and middle income countries to treat worms lice and scabies in both adults and children
it has been around for decades and not only is it on the WHO’'s list of essential medicines
it is a Nobel prize-winning medicine due to its increasing usefulness across a
range of different illnesses between christmas and new year
I independently reviewed 27 studies presented by the frontline covid 19 critical care alliance
as evidence of admittance effectiveness
the resulting evidence is consistent and unequivoca
ivermectin works well both in preventing covid infections
and in preventing deaths at this at the same doses
used to treat lice and other parasiticinfections
i am very pleased to inform you that
this evidence solidly substantiates the
flcc's recommendation
that ivamectin should be adopted globally and systematically
for the prevention and treatment of covid 19.
because i know there is a lot of fake news going about i would like to assure you
that you can trust the integrity of myreport
because i am an experienced independent
medical research consultant
whose work is routinely used to underpin international clinical practice guidelines
in addition i have no conflict of interest and have received no funding for this report
but most of all you can trust me because i am also a medical doctor
first and foremost with a moral duty to help people
to do no harm and to save lives
please may we start saving lives now
I thank you very much for your help
Mr hancock's office should have my details
these new Covid-19 drugs
which new drugs..I guess you mean the vaccines..
Ivermectin is an old drug..
the socalled vaccines .. we don't have all the data that Pfizer has
Pfizer is unlikely to be transparent... they of course have a conflict of interest with full transparency..
do I trust Pfizer ... no... only the raw data .. but that won't be forthcoming.
'Young women, migrants and Indigenous Australians will be given the hard sell on the coronavirus vaccine when the government rolls out its $24 million advertising campaign within weeks."
https://www.smh.com.au/politic…ears-20210109-p56svi.html
rather than a 'campaign'
I would just like to see the full vaccine data..effectiveness versus damage ..age group by age group.. I
don't think it would cost $24 million
also the projected lives saved
also the full data for ivermectin that Dr Tess Laurie reviewed
Do you consider these new Covid-19 drugs “vaccines”?
They don’t immunize anyone, and once “immunized”, you can still get and transmit this virus.
They do immunize the patient. All vaccines do; otherwise they would not work. You can still be infected, but that is 20 times less likely. If you get it, you might transmit the virus, but if you are not infected, you will not transmit the virus.
If most people get it, the total number of infections will fall so much that the virus will probably die out.
I'd like the FDA or any government org.. to publish the full postiive data for the experimental Covid vaccines.. if available
They publish everything, eventually. It may take some time to come through review.
When Jed says 'even when their data says the drug doesn't work
he is fudging ... which drug Jed??? ivermectin?? be specific please.. Remdesivir?
Any time they find a drug does not work, they publish that fact. They say "we recommend this drug not be used." When drugs are approved for other uses, the FDA always says that off-label use is legal but they don't recommend it. The fact that off-label use is legal is known to everyone. Here is what they say:
If you and your healthcare provider decide to use an approved drug for an unapproved use to treat your disease or medical condition, remember that FDA has not determined that the drug is safe and effective for the unapproved use.
That may not be how things work in other countries. I wouldn't know.
As I said, would you prefer they say nothing when they believe a drug does not work? Even if you disagree, and you think you know more than the FDA experts, I think that gagging them because you disagree with them would be unreasonable.
Here is the FDA letter revoking the use of HCQ, the HCQ FAQ, and the policy regarding off-label use of any drug. Nowhere does it say the use is banned.
https://www.fda.gov/media/138945/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/138946/download
They do immunize the patient. All vaccines do; otherwise they would not work. You can still be infected, but that is 20 times less likely. If you get it, you might transmit the virus, but if you are not infected, you will not transmit the virus.
If most people get it, the total number of infections will fall so much that the virus will probably die out.
I dunno Jed,
If I’m immunized, I kind think I can’t get the virus again because I’m “immunized”, and if I get the virus again, I wasn’t immunized was I?
I think that gagging them because you disagree with them would be unreasonable.
Who am I to gag the FDA? rhetoric?
Distrust... 100%
In fact, I know of one locally doing just that, and has been prescribing HCQ. Not sure how he is getting prescriptions filled, as local Pharmacists still have orders not to fill those intended for COVID.
Surprisingly, or maybe not so 
, today I ran across that local Physician prescribing HCQ for COVID. Asked him how he got his prescriptions filled, and he said he does not list a diagnosis. Said: "I am not stupid".
50% of those aged 18 – 55 in Pfizer’s trial had adverse events
No efficacy data on the octogenarians... the most at risk group..except for the 90+
what % of the 18-55 are at risk of death from Covid19..
where are the extrapolations for efficacy? to 80+ 90+?
They publish everything, eventually. It may take some time to come through review.
Here is the latest on Remdesivir.. Nov 3..
read the Gilead share price to see how it is going in the field. WHO dropped it..
My guess is that Gilead will never publish the mortality data
"
In patients with severe COVID-19, remdesivir reduced the time to clinical recovery. The benefit of remdesivir was most apparent in hospitalized patients who only required supplemental oxygen. There was no observed benefit of remdesivir in those who were on high-flow oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, or ECMO, but the study was not powered to detect differences within subgroups. There was no observed benefit of remdesivir in patients with mild or moderate COVID-19, but the number of participants in these categories was relatively small."
*****In fact the endpoints were switched to overlook poor mortality results... which have been seen subsequently in the wider world..
If I’m immunized, I kind think I can’t get the virus again because I’m “immunized”, and if I get the virus again, I wasn’t immunized was I?
I do not follow what you mean. If you are immunized, you cannot get the virus again. Whether you think you are or not makes no difference. Being immune is not a state of mind.
On rare occasions, people with a degree of immunity and weak immune systems are infected a second time.
Perhaps you mean that even after getting the vaccine, a person should continue be careful for as long as the pandemic is infecting hundreds of thousands of people a day. Yes, you should be careful, and you should continue to wear a mask, because the vaccine only reduces the chance of infection. It does not eliminate it.
Japan has found a new Covid variant. Here's how it compares to virus strains in the UK, South Africa
https://news.google.com/articl…=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
Japan's National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) on Sunday said it had detected a new variant of the coronavirus in four travelers arriving from Brazil.
The newly-discovered mutant strain of Covid-19 was found to share some of the mutations in common with those of concern for increased infectivity, the institute said, referring to highly infectious strains recently discovered in the U.K. and South Africa.
If most people get it, the total number of infections will fall so much that the virus will probably die out.
This works for e.g. a Hepatitis virus under the condition that there are no reservoirs in nature.
For CoV-19 this fails totally as all people with a vaccination still can get a PCR positive CoV-19 test- but there will be no progressing illness. Further we have a large natural reservoir for corona. Minks, cats an other mammals...
So next time you talk your buddies try to explain them the facts.
‘Dear prime minister my name is dr tess laurie and i'm the director of the
evidence-based medicine consultancy in Bath {U.K
How naive can one be? The top mafia boss is always the most reliable defender of the mafia rules
That's why he is there. Mafia is not about saving people live it's best case, about selling people live(s).
Coronaviruss: Chinese study finds most patients still show signs of ‘long Covid’ six months later
https://news.google.com/articl…=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
Most patients who received hospital treatment for Covid-19 developed long-term health problems, according to a large-scale study from China. Researchers found that 76 per cent of those discharged from one hospital in Wuhan, the city at the centre of the outbreak, still showed at least one symptom associated with the disease six months later.
Another example for early outpatient treatment.
Treat early, treat often and treat all
Surprisingly, or maybe not so
He is using the same playbook as the doctors who prescribed oopioid, undiagnosed pain. Eventually he will be called on this and if he tells the truth will have his licence revoked. Brave man!
Interesting find and experience of a doctor who did a "private" study within his patients... (German only, but can be translated...).
The ingredient is Cistus Incanus.
https://www.haller-kreisblatt.…wirkt-gegen-Covid-19.html
DeepL Translation of the most important part:
"Dr. Pandalis' pastilles have already been tested in practice. A doctor in private practice administered the Pandalis throat pastilles to 125 people. For at least six weeks, the participating individuals sucked two pastilles three times a day. At the end of the study, none of the participants had contracted SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, relatives living in the home of nine participants contracted Covid-19, but the participants themselves did not while using it. This was confirmed by PCR testing."
Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
