Covid-19 News

Quote from Fm1

The CDC and public health officials still recommend anyone over the age of 12 get their vaccinations, because the risk of severe outcomes from Covid-19 outweighs that of rare potential side-effects.

The CDC head is full of FM/R/J/B mafia. It's a business case only . Humans have no value for them except as business. Damaged children is the largest business gain you can make. Live long treatment needed and endless vaccination. Obedience training for future slaves.

Quote from Fm1

Last summer, Navarro attempted to distribute 60 million tablets of hydroxychloroquine that were stored in the Strategic National Stockpile,

Sent by Novartis Switzerland to be temped to use them here... In USA FM/R/J have total control. And be aware this is not about democrates vs. Reps. Both are equally in.

Quote from Fm1

Navarro accuses Fauci and CNN of having 'blood' on their hands after study shows effectiveness of hydroxycholorquine

First give him the Dr. Mengle award afterwards live long prison and forced vaccine trials during the next 20 years of Fauci's useless live.

Quote from Toffoli

The Campaign against Ivermectin: WHO’s Chief Scientist Served with Legal Notice for Disinformation and Suppression of Evidence

On 25 May 2021, the Indian Bar Association (IBA) served a 51-page legal notice on Dr Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO), for “her act of spreading disinformation and misguiding the people of India, in order to fulfil her agenda.”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/…pression-evidence/5746871

Such a beautiful lady, and yet she does that. It makes me wonder who is really in charge at the WHO, who is informing who, and who is telling who what to do in the WHO's Whoville of characters.

What a confusing tale. We have the WHO wrongly recommending against ivermectin since May, while most of India now uses it. Yet we have also have the WHO rightly recommending against remedesivir, while the rich of India use it.

FLCCC weekly update

Plant-based diets and shocking Covid results. Also shows that low carb diets seem to impair function worst than a standard diet.

https://nutrition.bmj.com/cont…/05/18/bmjnph-2021-000272

latest protocol from the FLCCC updated June 2

https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/

Prevention and Treatment Protocols for COVID-19

In October of 2020, ivermectin was adopted as a core medication in our protocols for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. For more information on ivermectin please go to our new Ivermectin in COVID-19 page, where you will also find our manuscript which was recently accepted for publication in a major medical journal called “Review of the Emerging Evidence Supporting the Use of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19”.

On these pages you can also download the FLCCC Alliance’s protocols to prevent and treat COVID-19:

Recently added:

I-MASS – Prevention & At Home Treatment Mass Distribution Protocol for COVID-19 (updated June 2, 2021)

The I-MASS Protocol was created for generalized distribution during mass outbreaks and in low-resource countries. To achieve maximal impact as well as ease of deployment with the lowest burden of required elements, the I-MASS treatment approach is centered on the fewest, core, high impact elements such as the drug Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medicine that is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, has been given 3.7 billion times around the globe, and has won the Nobel prize in 2015 for its global and historic impacts in eradicating endemic parasitic infections in many parts of the world.

Ivermectin has proven to be highly potent against COVID-19. It has shown antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties in observational and randomized controlled studies conducted throughout the world. Practitioners and Health Ministries who have adopted Ivermectin in treatment protocols report significant reductions in time to recovery, hospitalizations, and death. The use of Ivermectin as prophylaxis and prevention has also been proven in studies to reduce the spread of infection and offer protection to high-risk individuals.

Also included in the protocol are Vitamin D3, Melatonin, Aspirin, a multivitamin, a thermometer, and an antiseptic mouthwash. The evidence for supporting the other vitamins and medicine can be found here: https://covid19criticalcare.co…e-and-optional-medicines/.

The FLCCC peer-reviewed paper summarizing this data has been published in the American Journal of Therapeutics: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/.

Further supportive information can also be found here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/.

Additional treatment protocols for COVID-19, including for hospitalized patients, can be found at https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/.

Support for Ivermectin in the use of prophylaxis can be found here: https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-against-covid19-retrospective-cases-evaluati…

Disclaimer: The safety of Ivermectin in pregnancy has not been established. Particularly the use in the 1st trimester should be discussed with your doctor beforehand.

Electronic Cigarette Use Is Not Associated with COVID-19 Diagnosis

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21501327211024391

Abstract

This analysis tested the hypothesis that current e-cigarette use was associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients seeking medical care. E-cigarette and conventional cigarette use were ascertained using a novel electronic health record tool, and COVID-19 diagnosis was ascertained by a validated institutional registry. Logistic regression models were fit to assess whether current e-cigarette use was associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis. A total of 69,264 patients who were over the age of 12 years, smoked cigarettes or vaped, and were sought medical care at Mayo Clinic between September 15, 2019 and November 30, 2020 were included. The average age was 51.5 years, 62.1% were females and 86.3% were white; 11.1% were currently smoking cigarettes or using e-cigarettes and 5.1% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Patients who used only e-cigarettes were not more likely to have a COVID-19 diagnosis (OR 0.93 [0.69-1.25], P = .628), whereas those who used only cigarettes had a decreased risk (OR 0.43 [0.35-0.53], P < .001). The OR for dual users fell between these 2 values (OR 0.67 [0.49-0.92], P = .013). Although e-cigarettes have the well-documented potential for harm, they do not appear to increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This result suggests the hypothesis that any beneficial effects of conventional cigarette smoking on susceptibility are not mediated by nicotine.

Discussion

This analysis affirms prior studies that conventional cigarette smokers are underrepresented in the population of patients diagnosed with COVID-19.1 As previously discussed the potential for confounding and the limitations of observational cohort studies preclude causal inferences. There is a paucity of evidence regarding association of vaping and COVID-19.8 In contrast to the few prior studies that explored the association of e-cigarette use and COVID-19,4,5 we find no evidence that current or former e-cigarette users are more likely to be diagnosed, although our study design differed substantially, making direct comparisons problematic. For example, a cross sectional online survey study used a convenience sample cohort of adolescents and young adults during early period (May 2020) of the COVID-19 pandemic and found both dual use and e-cigarette use were associated with the risk of infection,4 although some aspects of the study were criticized.9 However, similar to our findings, another cross sectional online study from the United Kingdom (conducted in May-June 2020) found no difference in self-reported diagnosed/suspected COVID-19 between never, current and former e-cigarette users.10 Compared with these previous investigations, our study analyzed a clinical cohort (ie, patient seeking medical care) and used self -reported e-cigarette use data that were confirmed and documented in an EHR by a clinician.6 Also, COVID-19 diagnosis in our study was confirmed using a diagnostic PCR test.7

This analysis is subject to the limitations common to observational cohort studies, for example, inclusion of some, but likely not all, confounding variables (ie, related both to COVID-19 risk and e-cigarette use). Study participants were a convenience sample who presented for outpatient care to Mayo Clinic’s ambulatory clinics, a sample that may not be entirely representative of the population of e-cigarette users in the United States.11 Also, case numbers were insufficient to analyze how e-cigarette use might influence the severity and outcomes of COVD-19. Given the deleterious effects of e-cigarette use on lung function,12 it is possible that even if e-cigarette use does not increase the risk of developing infection, it could still increase the severity of disease, as may be the case for conventional cigarettes.2

Although e-cigarettes have the well-documented potential for harm,13,14 and the COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity to reduce e-cigarette use,15-17 our study found that such use does not appear to increase susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients seeking medical care. This result suggests the hypothesis that any effects of conventional cigarette smoking on susceptibility are not mediated by nicotine. Future work should evaluate whether e-cigarette use could moderate COVID-19 outcomes.

The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses

==> RNA vaccine reduce basic immune system reaction ==> immune deficiency.

Cytokine reaction to fungi increases. More allergies?

https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…05.03.21256520v1.full.pdf

More information needed and a stop of RNA vaccines is indicated.

Explanation by an expert in German: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ_NA1MUbIc

Europe reports rare cases of heart inflammation linked to all COVID-19 vaccines

https://seekingalpha.com/amp/n…-of-all-covid-19-vaccines

The safety committee of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has requested more information from developers after detecting myocarditis and pericarditis in a small number of people following the vaccination with all COVID-19 shots.

Most of the cases were mild and resolved within a few days, the EMA said adding that they affected mostly males below the age of 30 years within several days of the second COVID-19 shot.

Myocarditis and pericarditis are inflammatory conditions of the heart that can result in symptoms such as shortness of breath and chest pain. They can follow infections or immune diseases.

“Currently, further analysis is needed to conclude whether there is a causal relationship with the vaccines,” the EMA noted in the statement.

As of May, the region has reported 122, 16, and 38 cases of myocarditis after receiving the COVID-19 vaccines from Pfizer (NYSE:PFE)/BioNTech (NASDAQ:BNTX), Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA), and AstraZeneca (NASDAQ:AZN), respectively.

The cases of pericarditis stood at 126, 18, 47 and one for vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), after the administration of 160M, 19M, 40M, and 2M doses in the region, respectively.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has convened a meeting of an expert panel this week to further discuss the rare cases of heart inflammation following the second dose of messenger-RNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Quote from Curbina

Post Mortem finds in a patient that died 4 weeks after his first Covid-19 shot.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/…cle/pii/S1201971221003647

He had viral mRNA in almost all his organs.

In other words, he died of the virus. The virus injects mRNA into all organs. That's how it works. The vaccine cannot possibly do that, because it does not reproduce. A small does or mRNA produces the spike proteins for a few days until the mRNA dissolves -- as all RNA always does -- and then it produces no more. The only way you can get RNA into the other cells is with the full genome that makes a self-reproducing virus, which spreads everywhere.

The patient tested positive for COVID. He was somewhat asymptomatic. It says: "Although he did not present with any COVID-19-specific symptoms, he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died."

Covid-19 leads to brain changes & Alzheimer’s-like dementia, new AI-powered study finds

https://www.rt.com/news/526395…eimer-dementia-study/amp/

According to recent US research, Covid-19 may lead to the type of brain changes common in Alzheimer’s disease, and a team of scientists has identified the mechanisms by which it may be causing such impairments.

Cognitive disorders, including dementia, are increasingly being reported as a complication of the highly contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes Covid-19, researchers behind the recent study at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio have revealed.

“Reports of neurological complications in Covid-19 patients and ‘long-hauler’ patients whose symptoms persist after the infection clears are becoming more common, suggesting that [the virus] may have lasting effects on brain function,” said the authors of the study, which was published this week in the journal Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy.

The researchers’ aim was to uncover the mechanisms responsible for brain-associated complications such as delirium and the loss of taste or smell that are often found in novel coronavirus patients. In order to do so, they compared on a molecular level the host genes of Covid-19 and those responsible for some neurological disorders.

Having collected the data of both Covid-19 patients and people suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, they used artificial intelligence to measure the proximity between them. They also analyzed any genetic factors that might allow the new virus to infect brain tissues and cells, identifying “significant network-based relationships” between Covid and Alzheimer’s. They also concluded that Alzheimer’s patients may be more defenseless against the deadly virus, as they have a decreased number of certain protective antiviral genes.

While the researchers found little evidence that the virus targets the brain directly, they discovered close network relationships between the virus and genes/proteins associated with several neurological diseases, most notably Alzheimer’s, pointing to pathways by which Covid-19 could lead to Alzheimer’s disease-like dementia,” the Cleveland Clinic stated.

Having proved the overlap between Covid-19 and brain changes common in Alzheimer’s, the researchers will now study the processes by which the novel coronavirus may lead to cognitive disorders and how it might be prevented from doing so.

“Identifying how Covid-19 and neurological problems are linked will be critical for developing effective preventive and therapeutic strategies to address the surge in neurocognitive impairments that we expect to see in the near future,” the study’s lead author, Feixiong Cheng, said.

Brain-affecting complications in Covid-19 patients and those ill with other coronaviruses have been confirmed by previous studies, the Cleveland researchers point out. One in five patients who have recovered from the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-1) or the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) have reported memory impairments, while people suffering from the novel coronavirus have also experienced symptoms such as disorientation, inattention, and confusion. Covid-19 survivors who required intensive care unit admissions might be at an even greater risk of neurological and psychiatric disorders, another study of more than 230,000 patients has shown.

Quote from Curbina

He had viral mRNA in almost all his organs.

Typical RNA induced immune deficiency CoV-19 death. One of 50..100'000 so far. Enters statistics as CoV-19 death...

In fact a Pfizer/Biontec killed healthy old man.

Quote from Fm1

“Reports of neurological complications in Covid-19 patients and ‘long-hauler’ patients whose symptoms persist after the infection clears are becoming more common, suggesting that [the virus] may have lasting effects on brain function,”

IVERMECTIN clearing needed. Else mass murder!

Quote from Wyttenbach

You can never see any side effects > 1 year in an RCT study that usually is closed after 1 year. Pfizer RNA phase III after silly 3 months with illegal setup. In reality the Pfizer vaccine did not protect better than placebo. (200 additional people kicked out of vaccine arm...

Our timescale for COVID is one year so far. That is why all the authorisations are emergency use. And that applies just as much for drugs (HCQ) as for vacines.

HCQ long-term side effects are remotely possible (just as vaccine long-term side-effects are remotely possible) because both HCQ and COVID interfere with the immune system in complex ways which we do not understand, so they might interact.

Oh, and COVID long-term side effects - although not known beyond one year - are not just remotely possible - they are common and well known.

So anything that helps reduce those can be given even if it has some remote risk of long-term side effects.

In reality the Pfizer did not protect better than the placebo

I've no idea from what data you deduce this but it is 100% wrong, or else it is taken out of any realistic context. Most people in the UK have been vaccinated with Pfizer, it has (real world, large numbers, compared with similar unvaccinated) conferred enormous protection. It reduces chances of symptoms, hospitalisation, death all by very large factors. (Hospitalisation and deaths by factor of ~ 10 or more, even on the Delta partially escaped variant we have now). And it reduces viral load enormously, so even though it does not prevent infection to a very high extent (I'd guess efficacy around 80% on Delta variant after two doses) it still plays a very big role in reducing R value.

If you feel what I am posting here about the effectiveness of Pfizer in real-world mass application is wrong please give reasons and I will quote sources in detail, answering your queries.

Quote from THHuxleynew

If you feel what I am posting here about the effectiveness of Pfizer in real-world mass application is wrong please give reasons and I will quote sources in detail, answering your queries.

You obviously don't grasp any details. The Pfizer phase III study in reality did not show any effect because they kicked out 200 sick people. Pfizer had illegal access to patient records.

If you would do the same study during a non pandemic phase, then the numbers for Pfizer could be more or less OK.

We now very well understand that the Pfizer vaccine so far did cause between 50..100'000 extra CoV-19 deaths. In Israel the number of CoV-19 cases did increase exponentially after starting the first vaccination phase. The same happened during the down turn (lock down!!), when they started vaccination of younger. A giant bump in cases.

This is a Pfizer specific issue that for sure will have legal consequences. Bribed FDA/CDC and cheating Pfizer.

And for your memory: About half of UK got Astra Zeneca... The unlucky that got Pfizer now are vulnerable to the Indian (&RSA) mutation.

RNA transcription back to DNA..the reverse of the usual dogma

appears to be a normal function in human cells..

https://phys.org/news/2021-06-…-cells-rna-sequences.html..

The researchers therefore noticed that some of polymerase theta's "bad" qualities were ones it shared with another cellular machine, albeit one more common in viruses—the reverse transcriptase. Like Pol theta, HIV reverse transcriptase acts as a DNA polymerase, but can also bind RNA and read RNA back into a DNA strand.

Note that the theta does not refer to a covid variant.. yet