Covid-19 News

interesting, from Stefan's post, notice the estimated end dates of the vaccine trials

There would be no emergency use authorization allowed if there was an existing possible treatment.

https://www.fda.gov/media/97321/download#page12

Go to page 12 in the PDF (document page then read section D.

Pharma companies could not distribute experimental treatments unless they lied to us about existing useful drugs. Reminder:

Pfizer: Phase 3 trial estimated end date 2023 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368728

Moderna: estimated end date 2022 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04470427

Johnson & Johnson (it’s actually a Janssen Product which is a subsidiary of J&J): estimated end date 2023 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04505722

AstraZeneca: estimated end date 2023 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746

A little something I read in a Youtube comment.

Mouse1 to Mouse2 : Had your Covid vaccination yet?

Mouse2: No way. They haven't completed the human trials.

Teen boy dies a few days after receiving second COVID vaccine shot

https://www.mercurynews.com/20…d-covid-vaccine-shot/amp/

John Woolfolk

PUBLISHED: June 25, 2021 at 3:11 p.m. | UPDATED: June 26, 2021 at 6:11 a.m.

After a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention panel this week deemed COVID-19 more dangerous to kids than the vaccine to prevent it, Michigan health authorities reported to the agency that a 13-year-old boy died within days of receiving the shot.

The Saginaw County Health Department said Thursday that it received a death notice from the medical examiner June 17 that the boy had died three days after receiving the second of the two vaccine doses. Federal officials are now exploring whether his death is linked to the vaccine.

“Loss of life in an adolescent for any reason is heartbreaking,” the Saginaw County Health Department said in a statement, adding that Health Officer Chris Harrington and medical director Delicia Pruitt “are mothers of children near the boy’s age, so it hits close to home for them.”

The announcement about the boy’s death came just after a CDC vaccine advisory panel met this week to consider reports of heart inflammation in adolescents, teens and young adults after being vaccinated. Saginaw County health officials did not indicate whether the boy had suffered heart inflammation or any other health condition, and did not respond to further questions about his death.

The health department said that because the boy was recently vaccinated, his death was reported by the medical examiner to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

“The investigation as to whether there is a correlation between his death and vaccination is now at the federal level with CDC,” the health department said

The CDC said in a statement that “this case is currently under investigation and until the investigation is complete, it is premature to assign a specific cause of death.”

When a serious reaction or death is reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System after COVID-19 vaccination, CDC reviews all medical records associated with the case, including death certificates, and autopsy reports. The determination of the cause of death is done by the certifying official who completes the death certificate or the pathologist who conducts the autopsy.

“VAERS is not designed to determine if the vaccine caused the reported adverse event,” the CDC said. “While some reported adverse events may be caused by vaccination, others are not and may have occurred coincidentally.”

The reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis occurred more often in boys and within days after the second shot. The CDC panel did not indicate that there had been any reports of death in those cases.

The CDC’s Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group found a “likely association” between Pfizer and Moderna vaccines and heart inflammation in younger people. But it concluded “the benefits still clearly outweigh the risks for COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults.”

The 15-member CDC advisory panel agreed with that assessment as well as a statement by a U.S. Food and Drug Administration representative that advisory warnings should be updated to reflect the potential heart risk. The CDC continues to recommend the vaccines for eligible healthy people ages 12 and older.

The concerns over vaccine-related heart risk comes two months after federal health authorities suspended use of Johnson and Johnson’s one-shot vaccine after reports of rare but sometimes fatal blood clots, mostly seen in women. Use of the vaccine resumed after 10 days, accompanied by risk warnings for clinicians and people receiving the shot. Public confidence in the J&J vaccine has withered since.

The World Health Organization has concluded that “more evidence is needed on the use of the different COVID-19 vaccines in children to be able to make general recommendations on vaccinating children against COVID-19.”

“Children and adolescents tend to have milder disease compared to adults,” the WHO says, “so unless they are part of a group at higher risk of severe COVID-19, it is less urgent to vaccinate them than older people, those with chronic health conditions and health workers.”

Several respected health experts have questioned the CDC’s resistance to adjusting its guidance this week for adolescents and teens.

Dr. Marty Makary, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, accused the CDC of misrepresenting the data and said children should be given just one shot to lower their risk.

“Why does a 300-lbs man get the exact same drug dose as a thin 12-year old girl?” Makary asked on Twitter.

Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco, says young men 18 and older should seek out Johnson and Johnson’s vaccine, which is different from the more widely used Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and not linked to heart inflammation. The J&J vaccine is only authorized for those 18 and older.

On BBC news today: "Matt Hancock quits after breaking social distancing rules"

???? Give me a break. Isn't there more behind this story?

Quote from stefan

And after reading the paper. Age is actually included, it's in the result section.

Stefan you should first read what the trial site author writes before you make wrong conclusions yourself. The trial site author says: In the overview it is not mentioned that the selected group (age) does nowhere represent a group anybody would like to investigate.

So in the header of the article they should write: Study among young and healthy people age below 64. --> study not worth to follow despite it delivers the same result (=2 days faster recovery with Ivermectin) as all such fake studies.

Now may be you understand the motivation of Merck. Look for a cheating setup. Set a cheating goal = significant difference, where we define what is significant.

Quote from Fm1

I close by asking CDC, NIH, FDA and all of these alphabet agencies that have been failing us for so long, show me, show us the evidence!

India just started a kind of Nürnberg II trial. I hope the USA will follow and send all these Dr. Mengele adepts to live long jail and allow live long medical testing on them.

Quote from Fm1

The position of FDA is also that antibodies provided by the vaccines are superior to the antibodies developed from being infected by the virus.

==> Nürnberg II live long jail for inverting the result of science.

Quote from stefan

This Strategy is not wrong in most cases but as a side effect, what we see with the very alarming delaying of a good big rct study of ivermectin is not good as well. It is not strange at all for the medical companies to get their horse in the race tested first. It is not malice.

Do you know what you say??? Normal business = killing 3 mio. people ??? Did you visit Auschwitz = normal business??

Quote from Mark U

Spoons and forks sticking to skin don't cut it for me. ( Bad word play intended.)

Can you move all this junk to clearance please ?? We don't want to compromise science with WWW fun events!!!

Quote from Fm1

The Saginaw County Health Department said Thursday that it received a death notice from the medical examiner June 17 that the boy had died three days after receiving the second of the two vaccine doses. Federal officials are now exploring whether his death is linked to the vaccine.

So far no healthy kid died from COV-19. So now we have the first that died from fear ... to get CoV-19

Quote from Fm1

Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco, says young men 18 and older should seek out Johnson and Johnson’s vaccine, which is different from the more widely used Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines and not linked to heart inflammation. The J&J vaccine is only authorized for those 18 and older.

Yes Mrs. Mengle and they should buy a gun to kill the inoculating doctor if they later have adverse reaction they luckily survive...

China's vaccine diplomacy has reverse effect

"Since the pandemic began, 401 doctors in Indonesia have died, the risk mitigation team of the Indonesian Medical Association said on Friday. At least 20 doctors were fully vaccinated with Sinovac.

https://www.indiatvnews.com/ne…s-covid19-patients-714721

I urge you to follow the vaccination champion Israel, that now see an exponential raise in cases (like UK) that already passed 200/day. This is higher than Switzerland/Germany currently have.

I guess the details will be suppressed for the next 4-6 weeks because Pfizer marketing still invests a lot of money for the vaccine disinformation campaign. Fact is Pfizer does not protect against the RSA (1.3.5.1.x) strains and there seem to be strange reactions with the Indian version (No protection from hospital/death compared with unvaccinated in one tested set.)

I guess there is a lot to come. The situation can become very unpleasant for many...Not just for the vaccine killed/live long disabled children.

Quote from Wyttenbach

I urge you to follow the vaccination champion Israel, that now see an exponential raise in cases (like UK) that already passed 200/day. This is higher than Switzerland/Germany currently have.

I guess the details will be suppressed for the next 4-6 weeks because Pfizer marketing still invests a lot of money for the vaccine disinformation campaign. Fact is Pfizer does not protect against the RSA (1.3.5.1.x) strains and there seem to be strange reactions with the Indian version (No protection from hospital/death compared with unvaccinated in one tested set.)

I guess there is a lot to come. The situation can become very unpleasant for many...Not just for the vaccine killed/live long disabled children.

This whole thing looks like it is going to get very ugly.

It will require eliminating the people in the control group or at least trying very hard for that.

Quote from Curbina

Take a look at this one from around the 3:00 minute mark. The elder lady is being checked for EM field strength around her legs and she has values that are really high if you look at the v/m safety guidelines values. At some points it reaches 380 v/m.

Very strange. Why that one leg? Does she have a metal implant of some kind I wonder. Seems to have nothing to do with the vaccine unless she got her shot in the leg haha.

Somehow we need to tie this alleged magnetic phenomena into Jurg's SO4 physics, then he'll get interested.

Quote from Mark U

Very strange. Why that one leg? Does she have a metal implant of some kind I wonder. Seems to have nothing to do with the vaccine unless she got her shot in the leg haha.

Somehow we need to tie this alleged magnetic phenomena into Jurg's SO4 physics, then he'll get interested.

Well Wyttenbach. We've been desconstructing the "shut up and calculate physicists" and then the "shut up on IVM and Inject away" F/M/R/J group.

So you have to take the graphene challenge on....

Quote from Shane D.

Ivory Hecker did decide to inform her viewers, but her TV Station told her she could not. Yes, even Fox News local affiliates

Ivory Hecker doesn't work for Fox..she's been fired..but they haven't told her

perhaps not on youtube for much longer..@outside the Narrative@

Dr .Emanuel uh doing that uh famous or infamous uh press conference about hydroxychloroquine

uh she was she was a local houston doctor so they assigned me

to cover her you know and i and i and i covered her

local hospital and actually talked to patients there who were who were taking her treatment

fox said that the coverage was great but what we witnessed that day was

across the board a social media censorship

like we had never seen

before the sort of social media censorship that i had studied happening in china

for years prior to that it shocked me

that something similar to china was happening in america

so after that report i just did a side

social media video just talking about uh

censorship explaining uh what china

has been up to and and how we're now

seeing it right here in a

in the united states and even though

social media is not the government

uh it does have a monopoly and it is

indeed

i think having success at crushing the

free sharing of information which as we

if we look at history that is never a

good thing for free people

so i did that social media video and put

it out there got a ton

a ton of reaction my boss is freaked out

at me because of that

you shared your opinion about something

Quote from Wyttenbach

Stefan you should first read what the trial site author writes before you make wrong conclusions yourself. The trial site author says: In the overview it is not mentioned that the selected group (age) does nowhere represent a group anybody would like to investigate.

So in the header of the article they should write: Study among young and healthy people age below 64. --> study not worth to follow despite it delivers the same result (=2 days faster recovery with Ivermectin) as all such fake studies.

Now may be you understand the motivation of Merck. Look for a cheating setup. Set a cheating goal = significant difference, where we define what is significant.

India just started a kind of Nürnberg II trial. I hope the USA will follow and send all these Dr. Mengele adepts to live long jail and allow live long medical testing on them.

==> Nürnberg II live long jail for inverting the result of science.

Do you know what you say??? Normal business = killing 3 mio. people ??? Did you visit Auschwitz = normal business??

Can you move all this junk to clearance please ?? We don't want to compromise science with WWW fun events!!!

Display More

Wyttenbach I sort of understand where you are comming from in your tirades, but I have a different pitch on it.

Pitching a drug may mean that you believe in it and it's your role to pitch it, sales people do this all the time, listening to their researchers and be super smart at manipulating the customer. This is capitalism as we know it and that is what we as a people have said an ok for. I'm not in the business of running trials, and the process of the choice of what to put in the game and whats to put on the queue is held in dark for the us, the public. All I can say is that in my experience you need a well thought out system or process to avoid bias in the choices of what drug goes first, when we include corporate influence, and to me a generic cheap drug really risk not get the same clever pitching as the other drugs do and I simply suspect that we do not choose the order of drugs to test based on the best medical merit. You see I do not believe in evil out there, i believe in wrong psychology and faulty systems at play. Wrong system and processes is all over the places in the world and many times this is accepted and even hailed as religion. We accept and vote for politicians that want the universities to have systems where there is a tight coupling between academics and companies in order to direct research towards good research, this has been an on going process for a long time and is actually working quite well in many ways. There is however a risk if you want researchers to make objective choices or if you have that one bright idea that goes against the common dogma - you and everybody else loose.

Yes people and politicians will want heads rolling if it turns out that the proof of ivermectin was delayed we'll see.

Actually I have seen with my own eyes how smooth the companies sails persons are and It is obvious that they can have a psychological influence on doctors. I was quite surprised at the level of sponsoring they have of conferences and venues. On the other hand doctors is a top elite of the academics with highest grade in the country on pre-university tests, (money does not help here to get in, in sweden, which is good) and that means that they think quite well for themselves and usually base their choices on many objective measures and manage usually to stay out of the obvious miss information traps (we did not have the same opioid crisis here as in USA) if you think what i'm saying is bunk then consider answering why you got the over-prescription of hard pain drugs in USA that went south, it was one hell of a successful sails pitch behind that and not some objective choice that went wrong so we actually know for sure that there is a system error at work in parts of the medicine landscape.

"Researchers Find COVID-19 Virus Was “Highly Human Adapted” – Exact Origins Still a Mystery"

If you bustle shit long enough, it laps out [2015 Nature paper >>> 2019 bat cages patent].

Quote from stefan

Yes people and politicians will want heads rolling if it turns out that the proof of ivermectin was delayed we'll see.

I too... just checked out who owns Linkedin... Oh

No more Skype calls or doc.doc s for me.