Whenever evidence of harmful effects of this mass experiment surfaces, we get the magic catch all phrase (or spell?) that “the benefits outweigh the risks”.
Well, not all experts agree, as was manifest in this article, specially taking about the mass inoculation of children.
https://childrenshealthdefense…cine-dont-outweigh-risks/
But coming back to the general population, the single article that, based on publicly available data, attempted to cast more light over the possibility that “the benefits don’t outweigh the risks” and that passed the peer review filters and finally got published in “Vaccines”, and got nearly 500K views of the article, in a rare case where the reads of the article were 5x the reads of the abstract, lasted less than a fortnight before it was unilaterally retracted by the journal, ignoring all the responses of the authors to the criticism. I contacted the corresponding author and got his answers to the “notice of concern” and to the”retraction”. The journal never even bothered to publish those. Anyone can make its own conclusions about this, but to me, the catch all phrase “the benefits outweigh the risks” is brainwashing unscientific official narrative propaganda.