Wyttenbach and THH both have advanced math.... yet are polar opposites.
Bob - just a point here.
Wyttenbach's calculations may or may not be correct - it does not matter, because they are presented in a way so vague that no-one who is interested in precision can no what they really mean. They certainly sound wrong - and if in fact they are correct all he has to do is lay them out in detail so we can all see that. I have no great confidence I understand anything he is saying.
So I don't think we are opposites in content. I try to be clear, and give reasons for all my statements (links, nearly always). anyone can check what I say, and question why i say it. Also anyone can know what I mean. I am very happy to explain further if anyone is unsure. And happy to correct myself when I make mistakes.
Wyttenbach is opposite in that his statements are unclear - and how he gets to them is equally unclear. Given his statements are unclear I get the impression that he is polar opposite to me in content, but I don't really know it is true. I suspect he is equally happy to correct mistakes but I'm not sure I would notice when he does this
All I know is he thinks there some some sort of mafia with a weird name that is in control of the world's media and misleads everyone except a few enlightened souls of which Wyttenbach is one.
That is clear - but still does not help me understand what he actually is trying to say.