Covid-19 News

  • UK ONS Data


    The latest infection figures are 1 in 80 infected. A decrease from 1 in 75 previously.


    So for UK no social distancing + 76% vaccination of the over 16 population (who are allowed it) is controlling COVID. Just


    The weather (FM1) has not been great - one of the coldest and rainiest August's for a while. But It is school vacation, and not too cold. The real test will come first when schools return, then when it gets really cold outside in the winter and no-one can bear to open windows...

  • Let this be a lesson to us all....


    A Big Study About Honesty Turns Out To Be Based On Fake Data
    Renowned psychologist Dan Ariely literally wrote the book on dishonesty. Now some are questioning whether the scientist himself is being dishonest.
    www.buzzfeednews.com


    A landmark study that endorsed a simple way to curb cheating is going to be retracted nearly a decade later after a group of scientists found that it relied on faked data.

    According to the 2012 paper, when people signed an honesty declaration at the beginning of a form, rather than the end, they were less likely to lie. A seemingly cheap and effective method to fight fraud, it was adopted by at least one insurance company, tested by government agencies around the world, and taught to corporate executives. It made a splash among academics, who cited it in their own research more than 400 times.

    The paper also bolstered the reputations of two of its authors — Max Bazerman, a professor of business administration at Harvard Business School, and Dan Ariely, a psychologist and behavioral economist at Duke University — as leaders in the study of decision-making, irrationality, and unethical behavior. Ariely, a frequent TED Talk speaker and a Wall Street Journal advice columnist, cited the study in lectures and in his New York Times bestseller The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone — Especially Ourselves.

  • Breakthrough infections would be rare if the overall infection rate was small

    If the overall infection rate Rt falls below 1, both breakthrough and unvaccinated infections will eventually fall to zero. Breakthrough infections are much less likely than unvaccinated ones. Unfortunately, they are more likely than they were with the original and the Alpha variants. A reformulated vaccine might bring the level of protection from Delta back up to the Alpha level.

    but the idea that vaccinated people cannot be infected with delta is weird and I agree the US messaging has seemed very out of touch.

    No one said that. I follow the CDC closely. As soon as they began to learn about Delta, they announced that it is more likely to cause breakthrough infections. They said that within days of the first major clinical information from Provincetown. It was unexpected bad news, but there was no effort to hide it, and no out-of-touch messaging.

    The US has its problem with hospitals clogging up mostly because so many of the at-risk people in some States have believed political and anti-vax lies and end up in hospital.

    Exactly right. If nearly everyone were vaccinated, the hospitals would have no more patients than they have in a bad influenza year. There would be no crisis. Most COVID patients would be at home, safely recuperating. Except for COVID patients who are elderly and frail, or seriously ill with cancer or some other disease. The Rt would be below 1 and the pandemic would be receding.


    Naturally, another variant might show up, and the Rt might rise again. A new variant might even be bad enough to overcome the vaccines. Then we would all be in very serious trouble. That is more likely to happen with many unvaccinated people becoming seriously ill. They are a breeding ground for dangerous variants. The antivaxxers and the people who refuse to be vaccinated are not only endangering themselves, their families and coworkers; they are endangering everyone in the world, in every country.

  • Contrary to the claims of the manufacturers of messenger RNA vaccines, there is a risk of integration of viral RNA into the human genome. Our cells have the ability to reverse transcriptase from RNA into DNA. Although this is a rare event, its passage through the DNA of germ cells and its transmission to future generations cannot be excluded.

    Since Alpha COVID produces ~1 million times more RNA than the vaccine, * and that RNA is spread everywhere in the body, not just in the arm, surely the vaccines is less dangerous than the disease? And what about all the other coronavirus diseases? If the RNA from them can get into the human genome, we would see that happening.




    * Delta COVID apparently produces about a billion times more RNA than the vaccine.

  • Dooms day for USA


    The FM/R/XXX/B mafia guiding the FDA gave the Pfizer Gen Therapy an ordinary permit!


    Never before in the history of the USA a drug that caused > 50'000 deaths, that has no phase III study (stopped thus no more valid) has not been retracted!! Instead it has been promoted to an ordinary drug..


    The nice side of FM/R/XXX/B-mafia ass (Biden) already "forced" the nation to ultimately get the gen therapy. Also the US army (the small rest of it that could avoid it so far...) has to take Delta ADE poison. Same for teachers in New York. I hope these quit their job. I makes no longer any sense to educate people for a country that is misused by a highly criminal bunch of mafia people to gear up their fortune.


    It's out of question. The Pfizer crap gen therapy does not work for delta. People taking booster's will soon suffer from other viral diseases (also cancer) as the ACE-2 signal path (needed for fighting virus) is permanently blocked.

  • Delta ADE poison.

    Just a note on ADE.


    It is true that some antibodies (from natural COVID immunity) have been identified which could (slightly) enhance COVID spike binding. Luckily they do not seem to be a significant problem in practice.

    The anti-vax message, as always, takes this snippet of information and transforms it

    • Claim ADE is a big problem by attributing reduction in effectiveness of vaccines over time, and between variants, to this effect
    • Claim this is the reason for higher death/hospitalisation rates for vaccinated versus unvaccinated


    Both these things are unevidenced.


    • The higher hospitalisation/death rates can be an artifact (due to preferential vaccination of those more at risk of death). Since this is a known and large effect you would need carefully to control for this, see whether an effect still existed. And if an effect did still exist there is no reason to think that it would be due to ADE, rather than something else.
    • The reduction in efficacy of antibody response with time and variant is true for both natural and vaccine immunity - we do know that the two together give better immune response than either on separately.


    I'm not saying we should not watch out for ADE from vaccines - just that so far it doe snot seem to be a problem at all.

  • The Pfizer crap gen therapy does not work for delta

    Don't say that in the UK where with ultra-high COVID infection rate (slowly decreasing) we are going about business unlocked and with hospitals coping fine, and 100 deaths/day. Given we have approximately 30,000 cases per day and an awful lot of infections that are not cases we are doing well.


    Because of the Pfizer crap gen therapy - with 99% delta infection.

  • that has no phase III study (stopped thus no more valid)

    Pfizer COVID vaccin has a phase III study, which has completed its main results


    Pfizer and BioNTech Announce Publication of Results from Landmark Phase 3 Trial of BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate in The New England Journal of Medicine | pfpfizeruscom


    However it will continue to monitor participants for long-term efficacy and safety info


    All trial participants will continue to be monitored to assess long-term protection and safety for an additional two years after their second dose.


    That is standard practice with new vaccines


    THH

  • Leaked ‘Interim Clinical Study Report’ Raises Greater Concern of Russia’s COVID-19 Vaccine Sputnik V


    Leaked ‘Interim Clinical Study Report’ Raises Greater Concern of Russia’s COVID-19 Vaccine Sputnik V
    Is Russia's prized Sputnik V, the COVID-19 vaccine product first registered by a national regulatory authority, compromised by a recent confidential
    trialsitenews.com


    Is Russia’s prized Sputnik V, the COVID-19 vaccine product first registered by a national regulatory authority, compromised by a recent confidential report indicating “severe inconsistencies” and differences from the regulatory submission associated with the Russian drug regulatory approval? Apparently, a 136-page document titled “Interim Clinical Study Report” authored in January 2021 evidences material inconsistencies in the underlying clinical data while Russia pursues emergency use authorization with both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). At the same time, the vaccine’s financier, Russia Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), worked diligently to close vaccine distribution deals around the world. The Moscow Times also reports growing challenges, materially hurting the export drive, from production delays to logistical mishaps.


    Russia’s government via the RDIF has aggressively marketed the COVID-19 vaccine known as Sputnik V to numerous nations worldwide. Nearly 75 million doses have been administered in Russia alone, reports The Moscow Times, yet TrialSite suggests extensive COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy persists in that country. Several concerns emerge across scientific communities concerning the methods and processes underlying the clinical research supporting the Sputnik approvals. EMA has reported on unspecified yet “major” data shortcomings as part of an ongoing review of the vaccine product.


    Questions Behind Early Registration

    Russia’s RDIF and Gamaleya Institute beat out all other nations with the Russian drug regulatory’s most accelerated COVID-19 vaccine “approval.” Yet, TrialSite suggested that the vaccine’s authorization was more marketing than anything else. Why? Because the vaccine’s Phase 1 and 2 trial timelines were far too condensed, questionable pre-clinical research may have involved humans raising profound ethical questions, and the vaccine’s approval occurred before the generation of Phase 3 data. Actually, we suspect that the registration was a business development ploy. However, TrialSite did acknowledge that the vaccine product evidenced seemingly solid results, according to The Lancet.


    The Moscow Times concurs with TrialSite concerns:


    “Russia has long been accused of rushing Sputnik V’s rollout — which was approved in August 2020 before large-scale medical trials began. The developers at the state-run Gamaleya Research Center have also been criticized for obscuring important data in the results of the trials by refusing to share information with independent scientists and regulatory bodies.”


    Data Discrepancies Equal Trouble in Controlled Vaccine Development

    TrialSite has emphasized the importance of ALCOA to the quality and integrity of clinical trials data associated with new drugs and vaccines.


    That is, data from clinical trials must be Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, and Accurate. In The Moscow Times’ recent piece, reporter Jake Cordell shared that a review of the leaked document indicates “discrepancies between the information it contains and what has previously been disclosed by Sputnik V developers,” including the Lancet report mentioned above finding nearly 92% efficacy.


    A range of flaws starts from the more immaterial (e.g. typos, numerical errors) to the material, such as differences in the patient count. The Moscow Times elicited a response from a French biostatistician with CHU Rouen, André Gillibert, declaring, “Some of this is probably accidental—things which aren’t very severe but are just poor reporting.” But he continued, “But there are also irregularities and problems that are too severe to be explained away. I think there were problems within the trial that are being hidden.”


    The Moscow Times also raised serious questions about identified flaws in the Sputnik V clinical trial data, including Vasiliy Vlassov from Moscow’s Higher School of Economics and Konstantin Andreev, a biologist at Northwestern University. The new report just adds to the concern with Andreev, declaring, “Overall, there are lots of flaws, discrepancies and numerical errors in the report body.”


    The Moscow Times requested a comment from the RFIF—they didn’t reply.


    The Media Source

    The Moscow Times is an independent English-speaking Russian media owned 51% by Vladimir Dzhao, the CEO of an airline catering company, 30% by Svetlana Korshunova, general director of the paper, and 19% by Derk Sauer, the original founder of the paper. Speaking to Kommersant, Derk Sauer explained that this is merely to comply with a Russian law that prohibits foreigners from controlling more than 20% of any Russia-based media company since Sauer is a Dutch citizen. He further said that Vladimir Dzhao is an old friend of his, and “he does not control the publication, he is a partner,” according to reports.


    Call to Action: Follow the link to The Moscow Times. Also check out the report, which leads to discrepancies and contradictory data involving everything from randomization and adverse events to actual data.

  • Delta-driven COVID-19 surge in the south has likely peaked, expert says

    Former FDA director Scott Gottlieb references transmission data in predicting the delta surges in the south have peaked.


    Delta-driven COVID-19 surge in the south has likely peaked, expert says
    Former FDA director Scott Gottlieb references transmission data in predicting the delta surges in the south have peaked.
    thehill.com


    Story at a glance


    Gottlieb spoke on CNBC saying the declining rates of transmission indicate the outbreaks in southern states have likely peaked.

    He noted children under the age of 18 are responsible for new infections in Florida due to school reopenings.

    The 14-day change in cases is up by 36 percent––well below recent figures.

    The worst of the delta variant outbreaks for southern U.S. states may be over, according to former U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) director Scott Gottlieb.


    Speaking as a CNBC contributor on Squawk Box, Gottlieb referenced decreasing rates of transmission in hotspot states.


    On a day-to-day basis, new infections are being reported nationwide, especially in comparison to the early summer months. The peak of the most recent outbreak, however, may have recently reached its peak as new cases come in at a lower rate.

    "I think it's pretty clear right now the South has peaked," he said on Monday. "There's very clear evidence...you look at states like Arkansas and Louisiana, you see the cases coming down."


    He added that the rate of transmission for other southern states hit hard by the delta variant, namely Florida, is finally beginning to decline. This trend is apparent for all age groups, except for younger children, who are driving new cases.


    Gottlieb attributes this to schools restarting in an in-person setting. He also noted that the delta variant is "far more contagious" than other COVID-19 strains.


    "This outbreak is probably infecting more kids than what we've seen in the past epidemic surges," he said.


    Our country is in a historic fight against the coronavirus. Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.


    Gottlieb noted that it isn't evident yet that the delta variant is more dangerous than older COVID-19 strains despite the resurgence of hospitalizations.


    He referenced the state rates of transmission on covidestim.org, which shows lower rate of virus transmission than seen in weeks prior. Missouri, for instance, was one of the states dealing with a surge in delta-driven infections, represented by a rate of transmission at 1.30 in early July--a unit of measurement that describes the average number of people who will be infected by another individual.


    Now, as of Aug. 22, the rate has fallen to 0.79.


    National data analyzed by the New York Times also suggests a slowly declining rate of transmission. New cases are up by 36 percent over the last two weeks, much lower than the 140 percent increases seen in mid-July.

  • Inflammation is a big problem. The new book ‘Inflamed’ explains why we need big solutions


    Inflammation is a big problem. The new book ‘Inflamed’ explains why we need big solutions – The Seattle Times


    On Nutrition

    The notion of food as medicine is a popular one, but while nutritious food does have a positive effect on health, a “healthy” diet is not the cure for everything that ails us. Numerous other factors influence health, including genetics (our genes) and epigenetics (how those genes are programmed), as well as social and environmental factors such as stress, racism, climate change and wildfires.


    One way these factors affect health is by contributing to chronic inflammation, which in turn contributes to heart disease, diabetes, cancer and other chronic illnesses. Although anti-inflammatory diets are popular — indeed, I’ve written about them more than once — when we treat inflammation as an individual problem with an individual solution, are we ignoring its true root causes? In their new book, “Inflamed: Deep Medicine and the Anatomy of Injustice,” Dr. Rupa Marya and Raj Patel say we are doing exactly that — and that the consequences of that narrow view are serious.


    In this engaging, deeply researched book, Marya and Patel explore what inflammation is, how it affects our bodies and our health, and what’s really stoking its flames. They make the compelling case that while individuals can suffer from chronic inflammation, our individual bodies are part of an inflamed society (due to systemic racism and global capitalism) and an inflamed planet (due to climate change) — and that we can’t separate one from the others.


    “What we’re looking at in this book is transforming our understanding of what health is and moving the pursuit of health away from the individualist model to what we are calling deep medicine, which situates medicine and health as a practice of community engagement and [social and environmental] care and repair,” said Marya, associate professor of medicine and hospital medicine doctor at the University of California, San Francisco. She said if medicine keeps focusing on the individual, we’ll never understand why rates of diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and inflammatory diseases are rising.


    Each chapter explores the effects of inflammation on one body system — starting with the immune system and ending with the nervous system — and links them to causes rooted in our social, political and environmental systems. These include trauma, pollution, industrial agriculture, reliance on fossil fuels, debt, income disparity, dwindling biodiversity, climate change, gender violence, racism, social isolation and stress. And the interface between our bodies and the world around us? Our gut microbiota, the health and diversity of which is closely tied to the health of our immune systems and our levels of inflammation.


    “All of this is registered in our gut,” Marya said. “Our mental health, our immunity, our ability to stay well is dependent on these ecologies inside of us. And it’s not about taking more pills, it’s about stopping the stress that’s denuding our microbiota.”

    The book’s approach is a far cry from those espousing that if you follow the “right” diet and exercise plan, you will enjoy perfect health. Rather, it blows up the myths that good health is equally accessible to all, and that poor health is a mark of personal failure or weakness. Marya and Patel say the increase in inflammatory diseases is the body’s natural response to a pathological world, and the underlying problems can’t be solved by shopping for organic food, downloading meditation apps — or loading up on probiotics.


    In fact, Patel, research professor of public affairs and professor of nutrition at the University of Texas, said viewing health as a personal responsibility is effectively blaming the victim. “You’re trying to address the extinction of the world around us by taking a probiotic or two and that’s not how you stop extinction. There’s no pill for that,” he said. “If we are serious about living with rich, anti-inflammatory microbiomes, then we can’t supplement our way out of a social problem. If the problem is systemic, the solution has to be systemic as well, and that’s what deep medicine offers.”


    Patel said when someone treats health as an individual pursuit, they’re seceding from the rest of the planet, in a sense. “By following an individualist pathway and trying to escape from the sort of the extinction that we find ourselves in the middle of, you’re actually postponing the proper kinds of solutions,” he said.


    To trace the path of our collective inflammation, Marya and Patel reach back 600 years to the beginnings of European colonization — including the destruction of Indigenous communities — and explore the all-too-real modern manifestations, including civil unrest, the wildfires ravaging the western U.S., and COVID-19. It’s no coincidence that the presence of chronic inflammation is what can turn a mild course of COVID-19 into a fatal one. So, does nutrition matter at all when it comes to quelling inflammation and protecting health? Yes, but it’s not that simple.


    “As a physician, I always counsel my patients as individuals to follow a nutritious diet and try to educate them about the benefits of eating organic and to avoid dietary chemicals that are so pervasive in our food system, but many people can’t afford to do that,” Marya said. “Part of the joy of deep medicine is starting to grow our connections to communities who are fighting for the right to be healthy, and a huge part of that is fighting for the right to a healthy food system.”


    She said we can’t be healthy if others are suffering, and the delta variant of the coronavirus is demonstrating that — we can’t vaccinate our way out of the pandemic when the vaccine isn’t available all over the world, because new variants will just continue to emerge. “We’ve got to rise up and realize that no one is healthy until everyone is healthy,” she said. “That is truly part of what I would call the manifesto of our book — reconceptualizing health as a species and also as an entity on this planet.”

  • Aerosols have no where to go in rainy weather falling to the ground, humidity is an aerosol killer. UK will see a sharp rise in early September but an even sharper drop by fist week in October and Covid will become endemic in most of the northern hemisphere. Southern hemisphere might be there now.

  • A New Low for the FDA


    A New Low for the FDA
    An Op-Ed By: VaccineTruth Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite. Today,
    trialsitenews.com





    An Op-Ed By: VaccineTruth


    Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.


    Today, August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the Pfizer COVID19 vaccine in spite of the following issues:


    The vaccines are more likely to kill you than save you. The clinical trial (gold-standard medical research) evidence to date shows the vaccine kills more people than it saves (including Pfizer’s own 6 month randomized study which demonstrated a 7% higher overall death rate for those administered the vaccine. The vaccine reduced COVID deaths by 50%, however this came at the cost of increasing deaths from cardiac arrest and other causes, so that the net benefit is negative, i.e., the vaccine is more likely to kill you than save you. For example, Pfizer’s own study showed deaths from COVID were reduced by a factor of 2, but this saving was more than offset by deaths from cardiac arrest which went up by 4X. This is not a good tradeoff. The safety data in VAERS compared with the CDC data on mortality for different age cohorts also confirms that the vaccines are more likely to harm than help.

    No autopsies have ever been done in the US on patients who die after getting the vaccine to determine if the vaccine contributed to the death. It is astonishing there are 13,068 death reports in VAERS without even a single autopsy being done in the US and nobody in academia, Congress, or the mainstream media has called for autopsies. Autopsies are a huge risk for them because if they are done, people will realize just how unsafe these vaccines really are.

    Pathology reports from one of the world’s top pathologists showed that at least 30% of the deaths within 2 weeks of vaccination were due to the vaccine. He was immediately criticized by people who never examined the bodies!?! Calls by the Federal Association of German Pathologists to require autopsies in vaccinated patients who have died have been ignored by the German authorities. They don’t want to find out the truth either because once people learn how deadly the vaccines are, nobody will want to be vaccinated.

    No analysis has been done of the obviously elevated neurological and cardiovascular events in the VAERS system (see table below). How can a safe vaccine cause all of these events to skyrocket vs. previous years?

    A broken formula for adverse-event signal detection keeps the CDC from detecting safety signals that would alert the CDC of a problem with the vaccines. The CDC will not meet with us to discuss this serious error. They have no interest in seeing safety signals, so maintaining an obviously broken system gives them all plausible deniability.

    A callous disregard for the health of our children. There are 18 deaths in VAERS for kids between 12 and 17. Five of those deaths are from cardiac arrest and none are from cancer. Yet the CDC says deaths from cancer are twice as likely than deaths from heart disease for teenagers. So the vaccine is clearly killing our kids by elevating cardiac arrests way above normal. Ignoring this is tragic. This UK article points out that just 1 in every 1.7 million children have died with Covid-19 in 18 months, while 1 in every 9 children suffered a serious adverse reaction to the Pfizer vaccine in the small and short clinical trial which left them unable to perform daily activities. Mothers should be absolutely furious about this data being hidden from them.

    Refusal to listen to scientifically qualified VAERS experts who had analyses showing the vaccines were extremely unsafe, including Dose 1 vs. Dose 2 causality analyses that clearly showed the vaccines were causing significant adverse events. Dose-dependency is a very clear sign of causality but the FDA and CDC refuse to look at the data.

    Failure to investigate clinical trial fraud such as 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, paralyzed in the Pfizer clinical trial, despite assurances by the head of the FDA that this would be investigated. The Pfizer clinical trial reported Maddie’s adverse event as abdominal pain with no mention of her severe neurological issues.

    An American death toll estimate of 150,000 can be calculated 5 different ways (and the FDA and CDC wouldn’t look at any of them).

    Lack of any safety data on original antigenic sin aka linked-epitope suppression and ADE. In short, these vaccines may make the disease worse, not better, and the FDA knows both of these are risks, but the FDA isn’t waiting for the data to find out. In addition, there was never a proper safety study that measured the amount, duration, and distribution of the cytotoxic spike protein in non-human primates.

    A safer, more effective alternative exists: early treatment. Early treatment protocols, such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol have more than a 99% relative risk reduction, work for all variants, and have negligible side effects making them safer and more effective than any vaccine. The NIH and FDA ignore these early treatments.

    Too many open questions about the vaccine that still need to be answered. Peter Doshi’s excellent op-ed in the BMJ points out that the list of concerns is now even longer than before, and the fact that the FDA did not seek input from the advisory committee as they had promised to do, is extremely troubling for a drug that is now being mandated.

    Use of censorship, rather than open public discussion, to help the public discover the truth about these vaccines. We have 16 experts covering all aspects of COVID. Nobody in the world from academia or any government agency will publicly engage with us on any topic related to vaccine safety. Instead, they censor us. What are they all afraid of?

    We are basically using people of the world as guinea pigs in the largest scientific clinical trial ever, a trial with no “stopping condition” due to the number of deaths caused by the vaccines. No IRB would allow any clinical trial to exist without a death-stopping condition. What’s even more amazing is that not a single member of the medical establishment has a problem with the lack of a death-stopping condition on the vaccine. We remember that back in 1976, the H1N1 vaccine was stopped after just 35 deaths. Today in 2021, 150,000 deaths caused by these vaccines is not even large enough to notice.


    However, the FDA doesn’t deserve all the credit. A number of other groups contributed to this remarkable “accomplishment”:


    The CDC ACIP members, charged with safety monitoring, refused to listen to any evidence that there might be a safety problem with the vaccines or a problem with their safety signal monitoring algorithm.

    Medical academia who refused to demand autopsies on people who died within 2 weeks after vaccination, refused to demand a death-stopping condition for the EUA, refused to look at the VAERS data, and refused to openly debate anyone with divergent views (such as our team). The Stanford team who did listen to our concerns said they could not dispute what we said but that it didn’t matter because the decision on mandating vaccination for students was made at a higher level.

    Medical journals who refused to publish papers that went against the narrative even after peer review and galley proofs were accepted.

    Mainstream media that ignored vaccine victims, including Maddie de Garay, even though this was clear clinical trial fraud. They refused to give any voice to qualified people such as Robert Malone and Peter McCullough.

    Social networks including YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter who did a marvelous job censoring anyone who has views that are different from the narrative espoused by the CDC, WHO, and US government. For example, when people in the Facebook vaccine side effects group started pointing out that the drug companies made it difficult-to-impossible to report adverse events in the Phase 3 clinical trials, Facebook removed the groups so that all evidence of clinical trial fraud would be covered up and so that vaccine victims would never discover that hundreds of thousands of other people had been disabled by the vaccines.

    Members of Congress and their staff for refusing to seriously listen to any constituent who brought up legitimate safety concerns with the vaccines that were backed with primary data. Rather than explain how the evidence presented could possibly be consistent with a safe vaccine, the Members and their staff simply told their constituents that they were wrong and refused to read the evidence presented to them.

    Today, all of these groups are proud of what they have accomplished: a coordinated effort to suppress legitimate scientific evidence and dissent through censorship and intimidation and approve a vaccine that has caused enormous death and disability in America that has no scientific evidence whatsoever of an all-cause mortality benefit.


    It’s a sad day in America

    We salute scientists and doctors who are not afraid to speak out like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Bret Weinstein, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Chris Martenson, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Charles Hoffe, Dr. Francis Christian, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Tess Lawrie, as well as courageous journalists including Del Bigtree, Joe Rogan, and former NY Times reporter Alex Berenson, and others who are the real truth tellers here.


    America should be listening to and embracing all of these people, not ignoring them.


    Finally, here is a table of elevated adverse events that was extracted from the VAERS system. Anyone can replicate this table. The methodology is described starting on page 41 of this document. This is not a complete list. What this table shows is that this is the most deadly vaccine ever produced in modern times. Every cardio and neurological symptom we looked at was elevated. These events are consistent with the mechanism of action of the vaccines (causing a cytotoxic spike protein to be produced inside all organs). No vaccine in recent times has a breadth of impact as wide as these vaccines.


    Thanks to the FDA and others, we’ll now be mandating these very deadly vaccines for all our kids.


    In this chart, the numbers in the right hand column indicate the factor over “normal” that the symptom is elevated, so 473 means 473 times higher than the average annual reporting rate in VAERS over the past 5 years (from 2015-2019 for ages 20 to 60), The spelling matches the VAERS symptom spelling and the searches were done on the SYMPTOM field which is coded by HHS and not the reporter.


    Symptom Incidence rate elevation over normal (X factor)

    Pulmonary embolism 473

    Stroke 326

    Deep vein thrombosis 264.3

    Thrombosis 250.5

    Fibrin D dimer increased 220.8

    Appendicitis 145.5

    Tinnitus 97.3

    Cardiac arrest 75

    Death 58.1

    Parkinson’s disease 55

    Slow speech 54.3

    Aphasia (inability to talk) 52.3

    Fatigue 50.9

    Pericardial effusion 50.5

    Headache 46.4

    Chills 45.6

    Pericarditis 44.9

    Deafness 44.7

    Myocarditis 43.2

    Haemorrhage intracranial 42.5

    Abortion Spontaneous 41.3

    Cough 38.5

    Bell’s Palsy 36.6

    Paraesthesia 29.5

    Blindness 29.1

    Dyspnea (difficulty breathing) 28.4

    Myalgia 28.4

    Dysstasia (difficulty standing) 27.8

    Seizure 27

    Anaphylactic Reaction 21

    Suicide 18.3

    Speech disorder 17.2

    Convulsion 16.3

    Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) 16.3

    Paralysis 16

    Swelling 14.3

    Diarrhoea 11.9

    Neuropathy 11.2

    Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome 11.1

    Depression 8.9



    vaccinetruth

    VaccineTruth is a group of people who are concerned about the safety of the COVID vaccines. We support safe COVID vaccines. We do not support unsafe vaccines. Technical group members include both Robert W Malone, MD (our vaccine expert), Dr. Jessica Rose (our VAERS expert), and Mathew Crawford (our lead statistician). Group members also include concerned citizens such as Karen Stewart and Louisa Clary. Other members include medical doctors who have treated vaccine patients who fear retaliation if their names were revealed. Our articles are opinion pieces reflect the views of one or more group members. DISCLAIMER: The articles and documents are all "living documents" and not all group members have the time to review every edit. Please email us at [email protected] if you believe we have made a factual errors. We try to correct all errors promptly.

  • German researchers uncover secret to children’s protection from coronavirus

    A child’s immune system appears to be better prepared for coronavirus attacks than adults

    Researchers say clues lie in cells of the upper respiratory tract being on constant high alert


    Researchers uncover secret to children’s protection from coronavirus
    Children are mostly getting mild coronavirus infections. But it’s taken until now for researchers to better understand why exactly this is the case.
    www.scmp.com


    We already knew early into the pandemic that children were mostly getting mild coronavirus infections. But it’s taken until now for us to better understand why exactly this is the case. A child’s immune system appears to be better prepared for coronavirus attacks than that of adults thanks to the cells of their upper respiratory tract being on constant high alert, according to new research. The researchers found that in the event of an infection, children can quickly fight the virus before it massively multiplies. This probably also explains why children are much less likely than adults to become seriously ill with Covid-19, as researchers from Berlin and Heidelberg universities report in the scientific journal Nature Biotechnology in August.

    The authors say the findings may pave the way for more research as to whether scientists can pre-emptively stimulate protective responses in at-risk patients to offer them similar levels of protection to children when exposed to the virus.

    We wanted to understand why the virus defence apparently works so much better in children than in adults,” explained Irina Lehmann, head of the Molecular Epidemiology group at the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Berlin’s Charite hospital.

    In search of an answer, the scientists took some cells from the nasal mucous of 42 healthy and infected children and 44 adults. They then analysed, among other things, the activity of certain genes in the individual cells.

    To be able to fight viruses quickly, so-called pattern recognition receptors must be activated, the researchers explain.

    In search of an answer, the scientists took some cells from the nasal mucous of 42 healthy and infected children and 44 adults. They then analysed, among other things, the activity of certain genes in the individual cells.

    To be able to fight viruses quickly, so-called pattern recognition receptors must be activated, the researchers explain.


    2

    3

    Children are much less likely than adults to become seriously ill with Covid-19. File photo: AFPChildren are much less likely than adults to become seriously ill with Covid-19. File photo: AFP

    Children are much less likely than adults to become seriously ill with Covid-19. File photo: AFP

    We already knew early into the pandemic that children were mostly getting mild coronavirus infections. But it’s taken until now for us to better understand why exactly this is the case.

    A child’s immune system appears to be better prepared for coronavirus attacks than that of adults thanks to the cells of their upper respiratory tract being on constant high alert, according to new research.

    The researchers found that in the event of an infection, children can quickly fight the virus before it massively multiplies.

    This probably also explains why children are much less likely than adults to become seriously ill with Covid-19, as researchers from Berlin and Heidelberg universities report in the scientific journal Nature Biotechnology in August.


    Meet Grace, the health care robot created for the coronavirus crisis

    The authors say the findings may pave the way for more research as to whether scientists can pre-emptively stimulate protective responses in at-risk patients to offer them similar levels of protection to children when exposed to the virus.


    “We wanted to understand why the virus defence apparently works so much better in children than in adults,” explained Irina Lehmann, head of the Molecular Epidemiology group at the Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Berlin’s Charite hospital.

    Hong Kong children, elderly at risk in ‘imminent’ Covid-19 fifth wave

    22 Aug 2021


    In search of an answer, the scientists took some cells from the nasal mucous of 42 healthy and infected children and 44 adults. They then analysed, among other things, the activity of certain genes in the individual cells.

    To be able to fight viruses quickly, so-called pattern recognition receptors must be activated, the researchers explain.


    And it was precisely this system that was more active in the cells of the upper respiratory tract and in certain cells of the immune system in the children than in the adults, the analyses showed.

    If a virus infects the cell, the body produces the messenger substance interferon, which initiates the fight against the virus. In adults, the early warning system is caught off guard, the virus is not fought as effectively and can spread more widely.

    “We have learned from this study that there are obviously not only risk factors for severe cases of Covid-19, but also protective factors,” Lehmann explained.

    The study comes as some countries, including the United States and Australia, see a rise in child patients amid the spread of the Delta variant.

    Children made up about 2.4 per cent of US Covid-19 hospitalisations earlier this month. Children under 12 are not eligible to receive a vaccine, leaving them more vulnerable to infection from the new, highly transmissible variant.

  • The vaccines are more likely to kill you than save you. The clinical trial (gold-standard medical research) evidence to date shows the vaccine kills more people than it saves (including Pfizer’s own 6 month randomized study which demonstrated a 7% higher overall death rate for those administered the vaccine. The vaccine reduced COVID deaths by 50%, however this came at the cost of increasing deaths from cardiac arrest and other causes, so that the net benefit is negative, i.e., the vaccine is more likely to kill you than save you. For example, Pfizer’s own study showed deaths from COVID were reduced by a factor of 2, but this saving was more than offset by deaths from cardiac arrest which went up by 4X. This is not a good tradeoff. The safety data in VAERS compared with the CDC data on mortality for different age cohorts also confirms that the vaccines are more likely to harm than help.

    VaccineTruth is a 100% fringe anti-vax propaganda group.


    the claims made here are rhetorical and do not stand up to any rational analysis of significance. By giving the information without its statistical significance the authors must be deliberately misleading, or incompetent at analysis of medical trials data.


    7% higher death rate. ThePhase 2/3 BN162b2 trial itself has 2 vaccine group deaths and 4 placebo group deaths Appendix S3. The difference is not statistically significant, and that is the expected background death rate. It could just as easily have been the other way around (more vaccine group deaths). The deaths were all clearly non-vaccine-related.


    Fact check: Clarifying claims around Pfizer vaccine deaths and side effects
    Social media users have been sharing a post that makes several claims of serious negative health effects from the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, including…
    www.reuters.com


    One of the vaccine recipients had a cardiac arrest 62 days after a second dose of the two-dose vaccination and died three days later. The other died from arteriosclerosis three days after a first dose of the vaccination. One of the placebo recipients died from myocardial infarction, another from haemorrhagic stroke and two others from unknown causes.

    The FDA briefings clarify that the deaths were not deemed to be related to the vaccine: “None of these deaths were assessed by the investigator as related to study intervention”. They explain: “All deaths represent events that occur in the general population of the age groups where they occurred, at a similar rate.”


    Note this 100% increase in placebo deaths over vaccine group deaths is not considered statistically significant (and rightly so).


    The 6 month post-vaccination report has death info in S4 - which however is not published in the preprint. However based on the numbers of deaths in the initial report it will still be a small number and therefore 7% not statistically significant (as the 6 month report summary says).


    For any group of scientists not to look at whether these death-rate figures are statistically significant before claiming them as evidence shows either complete incompetence or a wish to mislead.


    The vaccine reduced COVID deaths by 50%, however this came at the cost of increasing deaths from cardiac arrest and other causes, so that the net benefit is negative. As before, this group is too small so that given background death rate it cannot be statistically significant. Nor even more so can any subgroup (e.g. cardiac arrest).

  • Pfizer COVID vaccin has a phase III study, which has completed its main results

    No! Pfizer has no longer a phase III study. It has been stopped after about 5 months by vaccinating teh placebo group. A normal phase III study for vaccines runs 2 years!


    Pfizer also did no follow up on the about 250 early Pifzer immune suppression induced CoV-19 cases. The whole setup was illegal as Pfizer had the supervision.

    All nations see the Pifzer immune suppression induced CoV-19 cases. It's not properly mentioned how to circumvent it. Some few doctors tell the vaccinated to isolate for 2 weeks.

    Note this 100% increase in placebo deaths over vaccine group deaths is not considered statistically significant (and rightly so).

    Here we agree. But already Pfizer gen therapy induced myocarditis is 5x above background according the US military study we here once linked. 500 adverse reaction half with with live long damage among 1 mio gen therapies is way (> 10x) above background.


    It is 100% certain that we will see much more damage from the boosters if these are not adapted to delta. But vaccination in a pandemic soon will select an even more damaging variant what will multiply the ADE...



    For your personal illumination once look into https://www.adrreports.eu/de/search_subst.html# letter "C"

    so far 20'000 cardiac disorders in the EU

  • There's a simple reason why the numbers of VAERS reports have gone up (compared to the last 5 years)


    Healthcare providers are required to report to VAERS the following adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination [under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)], and other adverse events if later revised by CDC:

    • Vaccine administration errors, whether or not associated with an adverse event (AE)
    • Serious AEs regardless of causality. Serious AEs per FDA are defined as:
    1. Death;
    2. A life-threatening AE;
    3. Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization;
    4. A persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions;
    5. A congenital anomaly/birth defect;
    6. An important medical event that based on appropriate medical judgement may jeopardize the individual and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

    Cases of Multisystem Inflammatory SyndromeCases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death

    Healthcare providers are encouraged to report to VAERS any additional clinically significant AEs following vaccination, even if they are not sure if vaccination caused the event.

    VAERS - FAQs


    Health care care providers were NOT required to make those reports before Covid19 vaccines came out. I'd guess that the most likely 'adult' vaccines pre-covid were influenza, pneumonia, shingles .. ? And most health care providers wouldn't report (eg) Appendicitis for them.